Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
He’s made it to double digit starts for the first time since 2022 this year.
Last 7 starts:
43.1 IP
29 H
6 BB
49 K
1.66 ERA
0.81 WHIP
He’ll turn 37 years old in the next month.
2 Cy Young’s
43.9 bWAR
88 wins
2.51 career ERA
1,728 Strikeouts
1,425 IP
5.40 K/BB ratio (best ever for a career)
Last 7 starts:
43.1 IP
29 H
6 BB
49 K
1.66 ERA
0.81 WHIP
He’ll turn 37 years old in the next month.
2 Cy Young’s
43.9 bWAR
88 wins
2.51 career ERA
1,728 Strikeouts
1,425 IP
5.40 K/BB ratio (best ever for a career)
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Hall of Famer ala the Sandy Koufax route?
43.9 WAR
228 GS
88 - 58
2.51 ERA
2.62 FiP
0.99 WHiP
ROY
2 CY's (6 top 10 finishes)
4 time all -star
I say "Yes"
43.9 WAR
228 GS
88 - 58
2.51 ERA
2.62 FiP
0.99 WHiP
ROY
2 CY's (6 top 10 finishes)
4 time all -star
I say "Yes"
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Clear HOFer, especially with the serious decline in pitcher longevity after the last 4 locks retire (Kershaw, Verlander, Scherzer, Greinke).
He and Sale are the surest locks of the next generation imo.
He and Sale are the surest locks of the next generation imo.
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Me personally, I'd rather include players that were absolutely dominant for short to moderate periods of time rather than "good" for a long period.rockondlouie wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:23 pm Hall of Famer ala the Sandy Koufax route?
43.9 WAR
228 GS
88 - 58
2.51 ERA
2.62 FiP
0.99 WHiP
ROY
2 CY's (6 top 10 finishes)
4 time all -star
I say "Yes"
deGrom isn't quite on Koufax's level because the IP was much lower.
However, my personal opinion on the HOF is that the position is "pitcher" not "starter". If Billy Wagner and his historic strike out rate is in the HOF then a SP that dominated the league to historic levels, even if for a short period of time, should also be in, or at least considered.
I have less problem with deGrom being in the HOF than Baines.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Only mentioned Koufax because he's the MLB standard we use for a player who had a Hall of Fame career shortened by injury but anyone who knows baseball knows was/is a Hall of Famer, not as a pure Koufax v deGrom comp.rbirules wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:29 pmMe personally, I'd rather include players that were absolutely dominant for short to moderate periods of time rather than "good" for a long period.rockondlouie wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:23 pm Hall of Famer ala the Sandy Koufax route?
43.9 WAR
228 GS
88 - 58
2.51 ERA
2.62 FiP
0.99 WHiP
ROY
2 CY's (6 top 10 finishes)
4 time all -star
I say "Yes"
deGrom isn't quite on Koufax's level because the IP was much lower.
However, my personal opinion on the HOF is that the position is "pitcher" not "starter". If Billy Wagner and his historic strike out rate is in the HOF then a SP that dominated the league to historic levels, even if for a short period of time, should also be in, or at least considered.
I have less problem with deGrom being in the HOF than Baines.

And Baines is in no way, shape or form a Hall of Famer.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
The first three you listed are slam dunk 1st ballot.
I don't put Greinke in their class, may take him a couple ballots to get in.
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Except for the fact that Baines is, in fact, in the hall of fame.rockondlouie wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:47 pmOnly mentioned Koufax because he's the MLB standard we use for a player who had a Hall of Fame career shortened by injury but anyone who knows baseball knows was/is a Hall of Famer, not as a pure Koufax v deGrom comp.rbirules wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:29 pmMe personally, I'd rather include players that were absolutely dominant for short to moderate periods of time rather than "good" for a long period.rockondlouie wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:23 pm Hall of Famer ala the Sandy Koufax route?
43.9 WAR
228 GS
88 - 58
2.51 ERA
2.62 FiP
0.99 WHiP
ROY
2 CY's (6 top 10 finishes)
4 time all -star
I say "Yes"
deGrom isn't quite on Koufax's level because the IP was much lower.
However, my personal opinion on the HOF is that the position is "pitcher" not "starter". If Billy Wagner and his historic strike out rate is in the HOF then a SP that dominated the league to historic levels, even if for a short period of time, should also be in, or at least considered.
I have less problem with deGrom being in the HOF than Baines.![]()
And Baines is in no way, shape or form a Hall of Famer.
Yes, I was just implying that deGrom's totals, including WAR, aren't as high as Koufax because pitchers don't compile as many innings now as they did 60 years ago.
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
He needs to have good health and post some solid numbers over the next 3 years or so to make the HOF IMO.
His numbers pale in comparison with HOF guys with short careers like Koufax and Dizzy Dean.
His numbers pale in comparison with HOF guys with short careers like Koufax and Dizzy Dean.
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Greinke has more bWAR than Scherzer, 3 less than Verlander and 2 less than Kershaw. By fWAR he is further away but still has 66 WAR. Just cause he wasn't as sexy as the rest of them doesn't mean he's not every bit as deserving.rockondlouie wrote: ↑22 May 2025 14:52 pmThe first three you listed are slam dunk 1st ballot.
I don't put Greinke in their class, may take him a couple ballots to get in.
But you're right, for whatever reason fans/experts seem to have a blind spot with him so I wouldn't be shocked if he doesn't go 1st ballot. He definitely should though.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 18 Jun 2024 20:56 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
deGrom certainly has hall of fame stuff. When healthy, probably the best this century. But, he hasn't thrown 100 innings since 2019. I think the 1400 IP's is going to make it an uphill battle.
Wins, WAR, IP's and post-season are all going against him. He could pitch three more years (like this year) and help his chances a lot.
The whole discussion around starting pitchers into the HOF (after the four locks mentioned) could go in a lot of ways. Another one is Felix Hernandez. He was dominant for 6-7 years and has a WAR around 50. There's Cole Hamels, Lester, Pettite, etc. all similar WAR but not likely to get in.
Wins, WAR, IP's and post-season are all going against him. He could pitch three more years (like this year) and help his chances a lot.
The whole discussion around starting pitchers into the HOF (after the four locks mentioned) could go in a lot of ways. Another one is Felix Hernandez. He was dominant for 6-7 years and has a WAR around 50. There's Cole Hamels, Lester, Pettite, etc. all similar WAR but not likely to get in.
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
88-58, 2.51 ERA and just 1,425 innings pitched and he gets in because he got two Cy Youngs, placing in the top three in voting three times?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Does Tim Lincecum get in?nighthawk wrote: ↑22 May 2025 15:27 pm 88-58, 2.51 ERA and just 1,425 innings pitched and he gets in because he got two Cy Youngs, placing in the top three in voting three times?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Exactly.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑22 May 2025 16:10 pmDoes Tim Lincecum get in?nighthawk wrote: ↑22 May 2025 15:27 pm 88-58, 2.51 ERA and just 1,425 innings pitched and he gets in because he got two Cy Youngs, placing in the top three in voting three times?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Lincecum had more than half of his career with an ERA over 4. He had 3 great seasons and 1 good one. And a 19 career bWAR.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑22 May 2025 16:10 pmDoes Tim Lincecum get in?nighthawk wrote: ↑22 May 2025 15:27 pm 88-58, 2.51 ERA and just 1,425 innings pitched and he gets in because he got two Cy Youngs, placing in the top three in voting three times?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
DeGrom has an ERA over 3 in 3 “seasons” with a high of 3.53. Yes, he had health issues. But when he was on the field there has never been any denying that he had elite elite elite elite elite talent.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
Do you put Chris Carpenter and Adam in? I think Adam for sure is as deserving as DeGromnighthawk wrote: ↑22 May 2025 15:27 pm 88-58, 2.51 ERA and just 1,425 innings pitched and he gets in because he got two Cy Youngs, placing in the top three in voting three times?
What do you do with the pitchers who had great seasons, but a meager amount of total wins and innings in the first 79 years of baseball when there was no Cy Young Award??? You gonna put Smokey Joe Wood or Jack Coombs in the HOF too? How about Urban Shocker or Jim Bagby. Or even those when Cy Young Awards were given. Bret Saberhagen? He's got two Cy Young and three top three finishes like DeGrom. How about David Cone?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4440
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Jacob deGrom is still Jacob deGrom
I don’t think he deserves to get in. Just four seasons of 30 or more starts is awful. I don’t care if he is good if he only makes a few starts a year he shouldn’t be in