nighthawk wrote: ↑18 May 2025 19:59 pm
I'm pretty sure the forum despised both players for their failures.... ....as they ultimately do with all players.
Am I mistaken, or did we not have an argument about the value of Lance Lynn, somewhere in the last decade and a half or so?
either way… Here’s some attention for both of us.
Red7 wrote: ↑18 May 2025 22:32 pm
Lynn thought he was getting 4/100 on the market, which is why he turned down the QO. The market said, “no you ain’t you big fat choker who can’t hit, bunt, field or run.”
Yeah, all he did was throw 200 innings a year.
Why do I feel like I’m in a time machine?
Bully4you wrote: ↑18 May 2025 16:42 pm
Could have been a much better scenario.
They gambled on these two and lost as well.
Lot of major mistakes by Mo.