No offense intended Jack but isn’t that just another way of saying he wanted out?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:41 amIt was more that Barbs knew the money he wanted and he wasn't going to be able to get it here.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:37 amHe saw a grinder and went out and got a 1st for him?Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
Barbs wanted out and that was that.
Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2022
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
Yeah probably, but I always take "wanted out" to mean he hated here and had no intentions of re-signing.Aesa wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:44 amNo offense intended Jack but isn’t that just another way of saying he wanted out?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:41 amIt was more that Barbs knew the money he wanted and he wasn't going to be able to get it here.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:37 amHe saw a grinder and went out and got a 1st for him?Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
Barbs wanted out and that was that.
That's not what it was, he didn't hate it here and likely stays if we offer the same as Vegas, but we were past a time where paying Barbs 5 million made sense for us.
It's semantics, and more my view, I definitely admit that.
Dh wasn't wrong so I didn't mean it that way.
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
That and it was reported here on this forum from someone with ties to the Barbashevs that his wife wanted to move.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:41 amIt was more that Barbs knew the money he wanted and he wasn't going to be able to get it here.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:37 amHe saw a grinder and went out and got a 1st for him?Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
Barbs wanted out and that was that.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2022
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
now that I wasn't aware of.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 12:12 pmThat and it was reported here on this forum from someone with ties to the Barbashevs that his wife wanted to move.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:41 amIt was more that Barbs knew the money he wanted and he wasn't going to be able to get it here.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:37 amHe saw a grinder and went out and got a 1st for him?Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
Barbs wanted out and that was that.
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
Forget who but said she is a model or wannabe and wanted to get to brighter lights than STL.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 12:22 pmnow that I wasn't aware of.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 12:12 pmThat and it was reported here on this forum from someone with ties to the Barbashevs that his wife wanted to move.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:41 amIt was more that Barbs knew the money he wanted and he wasn't going to be able to get it here.dhsux wrote: ↑15 May 2025 09:37 amHe saw a grinder and went out and got a 1st for him?Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
Barbs wanted out and that was that.
I believed the report, she does modeling, but the story certainly not anything confirmed.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Per Andy Strickland - Sam Bennett Blues Target
Barbie had a tough playoff series....11gp 1goal -9.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:33 pmEnd of free agency? Bozak was signed on July 1st in 2018, the first day of free agency. They traded for ROR later the same day.Cahokanut wrote: ↑14 May 2025 12:25 pmI don't agree with either assertion.bluetunehead wrote: ↑13 May 2025 15:11 pmThe reason why we overpaid for Bozak was because he was literally our only option for 2C at the time. By most accounts they all thought the ROR deal wasn't happening anymore and the Blues still needed another Top 6 center. When the ROR deal came back we suddenly had a surplus down the middle, which proved to be huge.Cahokanut wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:57 pm Army has always had a boner for this guy.
Not a fan.
Sammy B was -17 last year on Florida. -21 career.
12yrs 3 seasons with more then 20 goals. 2 seasons with more then 150 hits. Neighbours with 3 yrs in, has 1 less 20 goal season and one less 150 hit season. Almost the same guy. But 6yrs older and dirty.
I rather wait on the prospect (you know. This years Plan 4)
Then bring in another guy closing in on 30.
But like Bozac, and Krug, if Army likes him. He will be took to the wood shed, getting him.
We had youth options. Barb's could of easily filled that role. But Army only saw a grinder.
Also It was at the end of free agency, with no one calling him.
5mil was offered.
I do think Barbs had more offensive potential than the role he was given here but just as he is now, he was better on LW than C back then as well. Good player but his faceoffs and defensive metrics when playing C are not good.
23 goals, 51 pts this year thats what i expect from him 50 pts ish solid 2 way guy but not much else