Herrara
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Herrara
Bagwell and Ortiz had roids.
I just think of Herrera is an .800 OPS guy he should stay behind the plate. That’s not enough of a hitter to take up a DH or corner spot long term
I just think of Herrera is an .800 OPS guy he should stay behind the plate. That’s not enough of a hitter to take up a DH or corner spot long term
Re: Herrara
Cautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
Re: Herrara
I think it’s too soon to say what exactly he is, but I think he’s at least an .800 OPS player. And only 6 teams have an OPS above .780 from the DH spot in baseball. Our .599 OPS from that spot is the 2nd worst in baseball. So would I take Herrera being the full time DH? Heck yea.
Re: Herrara
For now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
Re: Herrara
Herrera was at DH last night, not Catcher, so it must have been Pages with the good block.
Weak arm with a greater emphasis on the SB with the new rules and bases around the league.
If not for Crooks and Bernal rising up the system, maybe you do try to keep working with Herrera with his C, but I think him being just an emergency C while learning LF and 1B is the way to move forward with IH.
Re: Herrara
For whatever reason, the coaches or the pitchers don't like him behind the plate... it's why Pages has gotten so much PT even with Herrera around this year and last. As fans we don't have much insight into why that is, we just know it's a fact.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:06 pmFor now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
So no I don't think it's a great idea to just shoehorn him into one of the most important defensive positions where his colleagues don't think he fits well, just so you can have better offensive production at that position.
Re: Herrara
Not to jinx the guy but I see that .780 as a floor for him because of his way in getting there.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:04 pmI think it’s too soon to say what exactly he is, but I think he’s at least an .800 OPS player. And only 6 teams have an OPS above .780 from the DH spot in baseball. Our .599 OPS from that spot is the 2nd worst in baseball. So would I take Herrera being the full time DH? Heck yea.
SO's good, BB good, OBP with a .360 floor, his lowest SLG has been .428 since 2023.
Absolutely no guarantee that's his floor but not a hard cap either.
Re: Herrara

Not sure how it’s shoehorning someone into a position when he’s played it exclusively for something like 400 games in the minors.3dender wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:12 pmFor whatever reason, the coaches or the pitchers don't like him behind the plate... it's why Pages has gotten so much PT even with Herrera around this year and last. As fans we don't have much insight into why that is, we just know it's a fact.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:06 pmFor now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
So no I don't think it's a great idea to just shoehorn him into one of the most important defensive positions where his colleagues don't think he fits well, just so you can have better offensive production at that position.
Re: Herrara
Very fair.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:06 pmFor now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
I'd say in the current roster and prospects that Herrera has less longevity at C
even IF he becomes average D there. Pages seems solid enough to always at least be
a backup. Only WC at 1B without there being another DH/1B in sight of a .800+ OPS
Re: Herrara
If it were only Pages, I'd continue with Herrera in that mix. Just me.3dender wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:12 pmFor whatever reason, the coaches or the pitchers don't like him behind the plate... it's why Pages has gotten so much PT even with Herrera around this year and last. As fans we don't have much insight into why that is, we just know it's a fact.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:06 pmFor now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
So no I don't think it's a great idea to just shoehorn him into one of the most important defensive positions where his colleagues don't think he fits well, just so you can have better offensive production at that position.
Cards have 3 C's in their top 7 prospects...I know they're prospects...1 is really knocking
on the door now, definitely by 2026. There's no rush, can let it playout, but today Herrera needs
to advance his D.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm
Re: Herrara
He's 24. It's not like the Cards have a plethora of .800 OPS guys on their roster.
Again, Herrera does not have an MLB catcher's arm.
AND....
Crooks & Bernal are not that far off. Herrera's future is not behind the plate.
Re: Herrara
Dang you are right!JDW wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:09 pmHerrera was at DH last night, not Catcher, so it must have been Pages with the good block.
Weak arm with a greater emphasis on the SB with the new rules and bases around the league.
If not for Crooks and Bernal rising up the system, maybe you do try to keep working with Herrera with his C, but I think him being just an emergency C while learning LF and 1B is the way to move forward with IH.
Thanks to all who answered.......I am going to agree with moving him away from full or heavy part time catching too.
Re: Herrara
If this is true add him to a pretty long list of players who were totally mishandled in the minors. Why play him as a catcher only for his entire minor league career? The arm shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:37 pmHe's 24. It's not like the Cards have a plethora of .800 OPS guys on their roster.
Again, Herrera does not have an MLB catcher's arm.
AND....
Crooks & Bernal are not that far off. Herrera's future is not behind the plate.
Re: Herrara
Have had same feeling as you that coaches/players seem to connect better with Pages . Might be his calling pitches, personality. Unsure but feel there is preference to have Pages receiving.3dender wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:12 pmFor whatever reason, the coaches or the pitchers don't like him behind the plate... it's why Pages has gotten so much PT even with Herrera around this year and last. As fans we don't have much insight into why that is, we just know it's a fact.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:06 pmFor now .825 is greater than anyone he’d be replacing by .100 points (even though that is still offset by how much worse offensively Pages is than whoever Herrera replaces). But long term there are plenty of guys that can give you an .800+ OPS at DH or a corner spot. Doing it from the Carcbee position not so muchrenostl wrote: ↑13 May 2025 16:02 pmCautiously optimistic.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:29 pm Genuine question because I don’t know off hand, but how many players spent years in the minors as 18-20hr .280 hitters with an OPS around .800 and then suddenly became 30+ HR 1000 OPS players?
I’m excited about Herrera, but I feel like people are anointing him way too soon.
He probably does need to carry that >.800 OPS if he is an OF/DH or 1B that
seems fair vs whatever he would do at C.
It's what he has done in 100 MLB games and over 400 MiLB games so far.
Staying at .825 or higher is greater than anyone that he'd be replacing there by 100 points
assuming DH or one of RF/LF.
There's a lot of room up to 1.000. That would be fantastic and
beyond nice.
So no I don't think it's a great idea to just shoehorn him into one of the most important defensive positions where his colleagues don't think he fits well, just so you can have better offensive production at that position.
Not something players or coaches would discuss publicly.
Anyone else sense this ?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6178
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Herrara
Followed him for awhile but can't spell his name?

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6178
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Herrara
(Cool breezey)rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 May 2025 14:12 pmSuch a difference when you watch I. Hererra swing the bat (DAMAGE) and when you watch J. Walker swing the bat.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 13:25 pmAgree 100% let him play some first base also. The bat definitely will play full time at DH if all else fails. Hes the one guy on the team where I will stop what I’m doing to watch him bat. I also liked after the game other day when I think he had a double and 2 RBI and he commented that he didn’t like that he struck out in the one at bat I like hearing that from a playerrockondlouie wrote: ↑13 May 2025 13:14 pm DH
Give him an OF'ers glove this winter and send J. Jay to work w/him.
Throw him into some spring games next March and see how he handle the OF.
If he flops, then he's your fulltime DH.
The kid's a hitter and made for the DH role if he can't handle the OF (at least as an option, not necessarily FT unless he really takes to it ala D. Murphy when he moved from behind the plate to become a multi GG winning OF'er)!
