I think it’s pretty much Schaefer being the cream of the crop and then you have Hagens and Misa going 2 and 3 or vice versa. After that it could go a lot of different ways. Martone’s size and ability to put the puck in the net probably keeps him in the top 4. I still feel if one of the Swedes is there when we pick, we likely go that route. Eklund plays a very North American style game…he’s got a lot of grit and tenacity to his game. He’s actually one of my favorite players in this draft….again I would not hate the pick if that’s where we end up going.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 14:00 pmHow do these top four actually stack up to recent previous top 4's?Bluser wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 13:58 pmThere’s 4 big prospects at the top. After those 4 it’s a decent drop offBubble4427 wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 13:51 pmi don't like the idea of tanking. You invite a losing culture into the locker room.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 13:42 pmNot if we finish top 5Harry S Deals wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 13:13 pmSo the big Swede Frondell is a total pipe dream?Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 13:10 pmI think there is a good chance he goes top 5.SameOldBlues wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 12:44 pmWhat do ya think of Jackson Smith? Im startin to like him the more I read about sm.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑07 Feb 2025 12:42 pm If the Blues finish 6-10 you can probably pencil in William Eklund. Not sure he will be more than just a 20 goal scorer but he has everything else in spades. I wouldn’t hate that pick honestly. 11 -15 though, I want Lakovic
But even still...if you are going to tank, this is not the year to do it. The draft is pretty weak compared to last years draft.
(At least, that is what the pundits are saying)
I am honestly asking because I don't know. This draft doesn't have a Bedard or a Celebrini. Last years draft was great up top and there was quality to be had in the top 12....
Pierre, if you are reading this, I would welcome your thoughts...
With that said…if the Blues win the lottery, Schaefer is exactly the kind of young dman we need.