GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

[swatski]

I gotta admit. Can't blame fans for not showing up for this one. These games against the Pirates minus the ones with Skenes are snoozers.

Yeah, you gotta win them, but it's like playing a AAA team.

Are you talking about the Cards or Pirates? I guess true about both.

[craviduce]

good job, Maton.

[icon]

You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb

From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

the ump literally said the call on the field stands after saying there was no blocking

If you can challenge all aspects of the play you’d have to be a moron to not do so….oh wait.

I see. If you're going to challenge a play like that, do it that way. So Oli is a confirmed moron again.

[ramfandan]

You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb

From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

[scoutyjones2]

You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb

From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

Yep...

[Absolut]

You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb

From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

My mistake. Interpreted that to mean he didn’t indicate whether Scott was tagged or got his hand in.

[butsir01]

loads them up....this is about to get rather ugly....

need a Timely DP

in my best Foghorn Leghorn voice : I say, I say, I say.... this Boy ^^^ is a genius

I say, son, that wuz a joke, son…..and a pretty timely one, too. See you tomorrow morning on “Tune in With Me.”

[Absolut]

You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb

From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

I doubt it. Just some nonsense spewing from your mouth thinking you influence Cardinals fans.

Busted. That’s really my Goal in life. To influence cardinal fans.

[craviduce]

that ate you up, KeBron

come on, Barrero VS2....drive in some more

[82birds]

that ate you up, KeBron

come on, Barrero VS2....drive in some more

now, Barrero

[craviduce]

Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

[craviduce]

PathetiKKK....3 K's with 2 RISP

[sp25]

Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

3 straight.

wasted opportunity

[hullie]

Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

Isn’t that the exact reason Baker is on the team? Lefty on the mound?

[82birds]

2nd and 3rd, no outs
no runs
guess they wanted Helsley to have a save opportunity

[icon]

Noot slumping big time. Oli will have Winn batting LO again soon.