Managers make convenient fall guys.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 08:46 amHe will survive the season. Nothing the Cardinals hate more than change. They will change in the offseason. They won’t do it twice. Well, they may hate paying someone to go away more. Tough call.Melville wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 08:19 amOnce the season is lost, teams inevitably trade or DFA veterans who are in the final year of a contract.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 07:02 amMelville, I’m surprised at you. You, and you alone, should have first realized that they aren’t going to fire Marmol during the season. Remember Super Slo-Mo, and the contract plays, and anointings, and falling in love hard?Melville wrote: ↑20 Apr 2025 21:52 pm I predicted a win total in the mid-to-high 70's.
With the potential to mildly surprise and win 83-84 wins if several factors aligned.
But I have specifically stated the that mild surprise would only be possible under one very specific scenario: the team would need to start slow enough that The Marmot would be fired somewhere around the 30-game mark, leaving sufficient time for a competent replacement to maximize the team's abilities and lead to a small turnaround.
They want to use the balance of the season to look at younger potential long-term options.
Same will be true of The Marmot.
But with even more incentive.
Managers make very convenient fall guys.
He will not survive 2025 as the STL manager.
More certain that the cost of Chinese imports going up!
Often justified - such as with The Marmot.
Sometimes not.
Regardless, the Cardinals are not a baseball team with a marketing department.
They are a marketing company with a baseball department.
The Marmot will be fired when the marketing leadership believes it best serves their purpose.