seattleblue wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025 17:29 pm
[quote="Harry York 37" post_id=12998537 time=<a href="tel:1744750295">1744750295</a> user_id=335529]
I am glad you are here. You present your posts more reasonably than most people here.
You have pretty thin skin and have shown that more than once. That is annoying, but I can deal with it as you have seen. And I do value your insights on the prospects.
It was the angst over Binner’s display which threatened to ruin your idyllic PNW afternoon that started me thinking.
I have played bloody and broken bone contact sports at a very high level until my mid forties.
I like the Sean Connery quote from the Untouchables:
They put one of yours in the hospital, you put one of theirs in the MORGUE!
Tell me your background as you have questioned mine.
If Binner doesn’t put an end to getting run now, he will face the usual criminals in the coming weeks… if he is lucky.
Petro’s incredibly pussified slash on Draisaitl two years ago ended his magical season, and knocked the Oil out of a Cup chance two years ago. Drai still played, cuz he is a stud, but the record setting scoring streak he was on was killed by that vicious and cold blooded slash.
Criminal stuff happens in the NHL.
I commend Binner for his immediate retaliation against it.
Calling what Perry did to Binner “Jostling” is inaccurate- even in a he man contact game.
I have been posting for decades about the Blues and I am often opinionated and often right but plenty of times wrong but some of those times I am right I am right ahead of the curve. Here's one example, Ryan Miller.
As one would expect, I have been the target of lets call them the hyenas. The people who bristle at different opinions than they have and almost immediately manage to turn it to a conversation about the person. Then it comes in waves and bunches. You've seen this dynamic, it has been going on mostly nonstop for the many years while I wasn't posting here. It's not me, it's a dynamic.
Just because I replied to you in kind does not mean I agree to your choice of reply. I wouldn't ever use an argument like "you can't understand this issue for lack of playing a contact sport." With all due respect I reject that idea or criteria even though I mirrored it with you.
You clearly were referencing my mention of Hank, didn't quote me, used sarcasm. I literally just mirrored what you did. I didn't quote you, I used sarcasm. Then you personalized it, then I personalized it.
Because of the nature of (gestures at the hyenas), I have to have a code. I basically treat others as they treat me. You know why I do that? because that is how the world works my friend. People treat others how those people treat them. Nobody's really much better or worse at that, in the end. You judge me for literally and consciously mirroring your exact replying format. You should maybe think about that. Is my 'thin skin' you really just externalizing your own discomfort maybe? As you note with the Binnington discussion, if you don't pop someone back in the chops suddenly it's 8-0 against, right? Hyenas. But that's here. There's no huge silver Cup at stake here. Just a discussion grind. Maybe you just haven't walked in my shoes enough.
I played baseball from very early, racquetball, some HS football, and rowed some in college. Beginning 30 years ago yesterday I tested my grit and stamina by walking thousands of miles across the US alone without a weapon or cell phone for the better part of two years. Pretty stout vision quest instead of working on Wall Street like a lemming. Does that mean something as far as me remembering Berube told Binnington that getting physically involved was interfering with his game?
If you judge it one way or the other, (and I assume there'll be a reason I'm not man enough etc,) would you still act as though Berube didn't do that since he obviously meets the threshold of being a real man, thus meeting your rules of who gets to even comment? I am in agreement with Berube's take on how it affects Binnington's game to get physically involved, and I have clearly shown a willingness to think about why Binnington did what he did. Therefore continuing to convince me why he did what he did was right has nothing to do with being correct which is what I am talking about.
[/quote]
seattleblue wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025 17:29 pm
Harry York 37 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025 15:51 pm
I am glad you are here. You present your posts more reasonably than most people here.
You have pretty thin skin and have shown that more than once. That is annoying, but I can deal with it as you have seen. And I do value your insights on the prospects.
It was the angst over Binner’s display which threatened to ruin your idyllic PNW afternoon that started me thinking.
I have played bloody and broken bone contact sports at a very high level until my mid forties.
I like the Sean Connery quote from the Untouchables:
They put one of yours in the hospital, you put one of theirs in the MORGUE!
Tell me your background as you have questioned mine.
If Binner doesn’t put an end to getting run now, he will face the usual criminals in the coming weeks… if he is lucky.
Petro’s incredibly pussified slash on Draisaitl two years ago ended his magical season, and knocked the Oil out of a Cup chance two years ago. Drai still played, cuz he is a stud, but the record setting scoring streak he was on was killed by that vicious and cold blooded slash.
Criminal stuff happens in the NHL.
I commend Binner for his immediate retaliation against it.
Calling what Perry did to Binner “Jostling” is inaccurate- even in a he man contact game.
I have been posting for decades about the Blues and I am often opinionated and often right but plenty of times wrong but some of those times I am right I am right ahead of the curve. Here's one example, Ryan Miller.
As one would expect, I have been the target of lets call them the hyenas. The people who bristle at different opinions than they have and almost immediately manage to turn it to a conversation about the person. Then it comes in waves and bunches. You've seen this dynamic, it has been going on mostly nonstop for the many years while I wasn't posting here. It's not me, it's a dynamic.
Just because I replied to you in kind does not mean I agree to your choice of reply. I wouldn't ever use an argument like "you can't understand this issue for lack of playing a contact sport." With all due respect I reject that idea or criteria even though I mirrored it with you.
You clearly were referencing my mention of Hank, didn't quote me, used sarcasm. I literally just mirrored what you did. I didn't quote you, I used sarcasm. Then you personalized it, then I personalized it.
Because of the nature of (gestures at the hyenas), I have to have a code. I basically treat others as they treat me. You know why I do that? because that is how the world works my friend. People treat others how those people treat them. Nobody's really much better or worse at that, in the end. You judge me for literally and consciously mirroring your exact replying format. You should maybe think about that. Is my 'thin skin' you really just externalizing your own discomfort maybe? As you note with the Binnington discussion, if you don't pop someone back in the chops suddenly it's 8-0 against, right? Hyenas. But that's here. There's no huge silver Cup at stake here. Just a discussion grind. Maybe you just haven't walked in my shoes enough.
I played baseball from very early, racquetball, some HS football, and rowed some in college. Beginning 30 years ago yesterday I tested my grit and stamina by walking thousands of miles across the US alone without a weapon or cell phone for the better part of two years. Pretty stout vision quest instead of working on Wall Street like a lemming. Does that mean something as far as me remembering Berube told Binnington that getting physically involved was interfering with his game?
If you judge it one way or the other, (and I assume there'll be a reason I'm not man enough etc,) would you still act as though Berube didn't do that since he obviously meets the threshold of being a real man, thus meeting your rules of who gets to even comment? I am in agreement with Berube's take on how it affects Binnington's game to get physically involved, and I have clearly shown a willingness to think about why Binnington did what he did. Therefore continuing to convince me why he did what he did was right has nothing to do with being correct which is what I am talking about.
Your skin is, sadly, even thinner than I thought.
I hit a giant nerve….
I neither quoted you, nor did I mention your name. I heard what Hank said, myself, and disagreed with it then. Whacking at Perry’s legs is weak sauce for getting booted in the face as you lie defenseless on the ice in a critical game.
Calling that jostling is disingenuous and I would have thought, beneath you.
I was wrong about that.
You were dead nuts wrong on this one partner.
Binner did exactly the right thing.
I have admitted being dead wrong at least twice on this forum this year.
I have no need to apologize for a goddanged thing tonight.
Let’s go Blues.