Cash flow is a better gauge than net profit. What's 7% of $2.55 Billion? Debt service that, including any principal reduction required by the banks each year.
Cash flow is a better gauge than net profit. What's 7% of $2.55 Billion? Debt service that, including any principal reduction required by the banks each year.
Can you explain this a little better? What’s 7% of the present value of the franchise have to do this?
Cash flow is a better gauge than net profit. What's 7% of $2.55 Billion? Debt service that, including any principal reduction required by the banks each year.
Can you explain this a little better? What’s 7% of the present value of the franchise have to do this?
Interest is deductible on an income statement.
But any principal reduction required by the banks
isn’t.
Multiple 7% times a value of $3.55 billion and it will tell you what the principal of the debt is.
How much they owe the banks. Only on the cash flow statement would it show principal reduction required by the banks.
So any poster who only talks about net profit doesn’t totally understand accounting and the difference between an income statement and a cash flow statement.
My understanding is that tax benefits play a part in the valuation.
1. Depreciation of “Assets”
When someone buys a team, they’re not just buying the players or the stadium — they’re buying intangible assets like: Player contracts, Brand value, Media rights deals & Goodwill (basically reputation and fan base)
Under U.S. tax law, you can “depreciate” these intangible assets over time (typically over 15 years). Depreciation lets owners subtract a portion of the team’s purchase price from their taxable income every year, even if the team is gaining value in real life.
Example: If an owner buys a team for $3 billion, they might be able to write off $200 million+ per year in depreciation — which can drastically lower how much they owe in taxes.
2. Paper Losses, Real Gains
Even if a team is profitable, depreciation and other deductions can make it look like it’s losing money on paper. That means: The owner pays less in taxes (sometimes none at all). Meanwhile, the team’s actual market value is likely going up.
3. Selling the Team = Huge Capital Gain
When the owner eventually sells the team (which likely appreciated over the years), they pay a capital gains tax, which is lower than regular income tax. So they get years of tax breaks, then a big (but relatively low-taxed) payday when they cash out.
Well there goes my argument that the Cardinals won't be a revenue sharing payor anymore. Ballpark village must be ridiculously profitable with these numbers for a down year.
Cash flow is a better gauge than net profit. What's 7% of $2.55 Billion? Debt service that, including any principal reduction required by the banks each year.
Huh
Cash Flow is simply the movement of money in and out of the business, are you trying to act like the Cardinals are cash poor?
Last edited by rockondlouie on 11 Apr 2025 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.