Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in debelopment then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Yea baseball isnt as easy as you think it is and development isnt as easy as "just grow up and settle in" some players need to actually develop and not be jerked around from role to role. If development wasnt important the cardinals wouldnt have acknowledged they screwed up their development program and brought in bloom to fix itecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:08 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in development then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Unless Libby finds a way (and he hasn't in 194.66 innings) to get right handed hitters out at a higher success rate, then he's going to struggle as a starter when opposing Managers stack their lineups w/seven, eight or even nine righthanded hitters.
Libby career vs Righthanded hitters:
602 RH Hitters
.296 .366 .509 .875
Libby 2025 vs Righthanded hitters:
41 RH Hitters
.342 .342 .488 .829
Libby 2024 vs Righthanded hitters:
220 RH Hitters
.263 .344 .479 .823
I want the kid to succeed as a starter as much as any of you.
But he hasn't shown any ability in 194.66 MLB innings (vs 602 righthanded hitters) to have the success needed to be a successful starter when he can't hold righthanded hitters below an .800+ OPS.
Libby career vs Righthanded hitters:
602 RH Hitters
.296 .366 .509 .875
Libby 2025 vs Righthanded hitters:
41 RH Hitters
.342 .342 .488 .829
Libby 2024 vs Righthanded hitters:
220 RH Hitters
.263 .344 .479 .823
I want the kid to succeed as a starter as much as any of you.
But he hasn't shown any ability in 194.66 MLB innings (vs 602 righthanded hitters) to have the success needed to be a successful starter when he can't hold righthanded hitters below an .800+ OPS.
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
I can see what you mean if this were May, 2023.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:19 pmYea baseball isnt as easy as you think it is and development isnt as easy as "just grow up and settle in" some players need to actually develop and not be jerked around from role to role. If development wasnt important the cardinals wouldnt have acknowledged they screwed up their development program and brought in bloom to fix itecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:08 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in development then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.
But we are two years later.
FYI: As I said in another thread, I’m in favor of keeping him in the rotation.
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
What’s higher than infinity?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
well i agree with you he should be in the rotation. I don't know if he will be a good or decent starter the chances are good the people who say hes not a starter are right I am not saying they are wrong. What i am saying is His development has been so badly mishandled that I want to see what he can do for a full season of uninterrupted starts. The cardinals arent going anywhere this season let him start. They should release MM and bring up McGreevy let him develop in the majors he wouldnt do much worse than MM.ecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:35 pmI can see what you mean if this were May, 2023.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:19 pmYea baseball isnt as easy as you think it is and development isnt as easy as "just grow up and settle in" some players need to actually develop and not be jerked around from role to role. If development wasnt important the cardinals wouldnt have acknowledged they screwed up their development program and brought in bloom to fix itecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:08 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in development then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.
But we are two years later.
FYI: As I said in another thread, I’m in favor of keeping him in the rotation.
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
The fact is this team has not had a MLB competent pitching coach for 3 years at least. So his OJT has not put him in a position of success. When/if MO Ran, Marmot, and Blake are gone on Oct 1st he may just get that MLB competent pitching coach to help determine if he is a MLB SP. Would anyone want MO Ran, Marmot, Blake, et al in charge of your future?
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
You are such a pitching expert Ozzie?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:49 pmwell i agree with you he should be in the rotation. I don't know if he will be a good or decent starter the chances are good the people who say hes not a starter are right I am not saying they are wrong. What i am saying is His development has been so badly mishandled that I want to see what he can do for a full season of uninterrupted starts. The cardinals arent going anywhere this season let him start. They should release MM and bring up McGreevy let him develop in the majors he wouldnt do much worse than MM.ecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:35 pmI can see what you mean if this were May, 2023.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:19 pmYea baseball isnt as easy as you think it is and development isnt as easy as "just grow up and settle in" some players need to actually develop and not be jerked around from role to role. If development wasnt important the cardinals wouldnt have acknowledged they screwed up their development program and brought in bloom to fix itecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:08 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in development then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.
But we are two years later.
FYI: As I said in another thread, I’m in favor of keeping him in the rotation.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12469
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Do you believe they’ve handled Liberatore’s development well? If so, why? If not, why not?
Last edited by An Old Friend on 08 Apr 2025 19:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Libby put up four 0's after a rough 2nd inning last night. He got all the way into the 7th inning before getting tagged again.
I'm giving Libby more than a minute to figure it out. The cardinals need to replace 3 starting pitchers next year. Liberatore, McGreevy, Mathew's are the candidates so far.
Mikolas just stinks.
I'm giving Libby more than a minute to figure it out. The cardinals need to replace 3 starting pitchers next year. Liberatore, McGreevy, Mathew's are the candidates so far.
Mikolas just stinks.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12469
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Your boy Mo admitted he gutted the development system and admitted it wasn’t good and needed to be fixed he hired bloom to fix the development system he screwed up so yea they not only badly mishandled liebratore but a number of other prospects alsothetank2 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 19:21 pmYou are such a pitching expert Ozzie?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:49 pmwell i agree with you he should be in the rotation. I don't know if he will be a good or decent starter the chances are good the people who say hes not a starter are right I am not saying they are wrong. What i am saying is His development has been so badly mishandled that I want to see what he can do for a full season of uninterrupted starts. The cardinals arent going anywhere this season let him start. They should release MM and bring up McGreevy let him develop in the majors he wouldnt do much worse than MM.ecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:35 pmI can see what you mean if this were May, 2023.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:19 pmYea baseball isnt as easy as you think it is and development isnt as easy as "just grow up and settle in" some players need to actually develop and not be jerked around from role to role. If development wasnt important the cardinals wouldnt have acknowledged they screwed up their development program and brought in bloom to fix itecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 14:08 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 13:00 pmGee really I had no idea! It doesn’t change the fact in 2019 he pitched in A ball then missed all of 2020 due to covid then in 2021 after missing an entire year he was skipped to starting in AAA missing a year then skipping from A to AAA is a set back in development then they started jerking him between rotation and bullpenecleme22 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:53 pmCovid was 5 years agoOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 12:51 pm+1 his development was already stunted from the covid year he missed then he was skipped from A ball to AAA after missing then covid season then they jerked him around between bullpen and rotation his development was screwedAn Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 11:42 amI don't know why people devalue this so much when talking about him as a starting pitcher prospect. He's not even in his arb years, either. Plenty of time to evaluate!Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:58 am Cite what you want, but the facts are that he has never been given an actual chance to start regularly, and has been yanked back and forth between the bullpen and rotation with seemingly no plan behind it.
If you give him the year and he is junk, then maybe you can make a final decision. But he's still 25, Bloom apparently loves him, and he's never been given the chance like he has. Besides, while the ERA is ugly, the peripherals are looking good. Keep starting him.
Oh yea, and this is a reset year, or whatever you want to call it. The young guys should play. Probably should have started last year, or even at the end of the year when it was clear we weren't going anywhere, but we blew that opportunity. No need to blow this one.
Yeah…. At a certain point a player needs to grow up and settle in.
But we are two years later.
FYI: As I said in another thread, I’m in favor of keeping him in the rotation.
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Point taken. It was yesterday. Memories fade fast.An Old Friend wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 19:31 pmHe gave up a single and struck a guy out before being lifted in the 7th. Why would you characterize that as “getting tagged again”?
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Pretty sure Gray is signed for 2026 already.RunSup wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 19:29 pm Libby put up four 0's after a rough 2nd inning last night. He got all the way into the 7th inning before getting tagged again.
I'm giving Libby more than a minute to figure it out. The cardinals need to replace 3 starting pitchers next year. Liberatore, McGreevy, Mathew's are the candidates so far.
Mikolas just stinks.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12469
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Crickets from thetank, predictably, when asked to support his disagreement.
All insults, no substance.
All insults, no substance.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: What if Libby's ERA remains higher than Mikolas' 2024?
Let’s hope they don’t accept this soon and give him a few more startsrockondlouie wrote: ↑08 Apr 2025 10:38 am Libby
26 career GS
5.86 ERA
1.57 WHiP
One day soon the Cardinals are going to have to accept that he's a quality MRP, not a starter.