NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4205
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by ramfandan »

Reds defeat Brewers 11-7 tonight. Pirates also lose.
Cubs best Padres

In one of those quirky math stats, St. Louis trails Cubs by one game though have 3 losses to Cubs 4 as Chicago havve played 11 games 7-4 record. cards are 4-3 in 7 games.

Brewers after opening 0-4 were on a 4 game win streak 4-4
With tonight’s loss now going to 4-5 record .
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 6788
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by Futuregm2 »

Meh it’s far too early to worry about where we are in loss columns.
cardsfaninla
Forum User
Posts: 864
Joined: 23 May 2024 19:14 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by cardsfaninla »

Sadly I fear we may be trailing the Northsiders for the rest of the season. That season opening sweep might just be our high water mark.

Not what I want .... but .... there is almost always hope (in baseball anyway)
go cards
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4205
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by ramfandan »

Futuregm2 wrote: 05 Apr 2025 20:58 pm Meh it’s far too early to worry about where we are in loss columns.
Who’s worrying.. just pointing out Cards have less losses than division leader.

If I was truly worrying, I would have said ‘Only 155 games left to catch those Cubbues !’ :D :D
RichieRichSTL
Forum User
Posts: 566
Joined: 24 May 2024 08:31 am

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by RichieRichSTL »

cardsfaninla wrote: 05 Apr 2025 21:00 pm Sadly I fear we may be trailing the Northsiders for the rest of the season. That season opening sweep might just be our high water mark.

Not what I want .... but .... there is almost always hope (in baseball anyway)
go cards
The Cubs, Dodgers series aside, on paper, are the best in the division, but not by a mile. Teams have to enough talent to have a chance. But given, enough talent the team that gels the best tends to win.

The Cardinals aren't the 0-3 start or the 1-3 next 4. They are a team that is that will probably finish around .500.
icon
Forum User
Posts: 3357
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by icon »

Futuregm2 wrote: 05 Apr 2025 20:58 pm Meh it’s far too early to worry about where we are in loss columns.
No kidding. People actually caring about the standings the 1st week of April? Strange.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4205
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by ramfandan »

Think that(checking standings ) comes from my bowling background. In our major leauge , it was a 32 week season. 96 total games. The games in September were as important as the games in late April. Each week bowlers came to the lanes , you went to
league standing sheet . Bowlers would A. check the W-L standings, B. Lane Assignments for that night C. Average of yourself and fellow bowlers
D. If you were in 1st place, you would certainly look at who the 2nd place team was bowling that evening. It was a very competitive scratch league.

So just a creature of habit to check standings in MLB as bowling leagues over all those years.
RamFan08NY
Forum User
Posts: 707
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by RamFan08NY »

ramfandan wrote: 06 Apr 2025 08:05 am Think that(checking standings ) comes from my bowling background. In our major leauge , it was a 32 week season. 96 total games. The games in September were as important as the games in late April. Each week bowlers came to the lanes , you went to
league standing sheet . Bowlers would A. check the W-L standings, B. Lane Assignments for that night C. Average of yourself and fellow bowlers
D. If you were in 1st place, you would certainly look at who the 2nd place team was bowling that evening. It was a very competitive scratch league.

So just a creature of habit to check standings in MLB as bowling leagues over all those years.
But, in most leagues, they are split up in quarters, with $$$ being paid out for all 4 quarter winners. In this case, yes, monitoring standing every week is normal.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 4407
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

RamFan08NY wrote: 06 Apr 2025 08:29 am
ramfandan wrote: 06 Apr 2025 08:05 am Think that(checking standings ) comes from my bowling background. In our major leauge , it was a 32 week season. 96 total games. The games in September were as important as the games in late April. Each week bowlers came to the lanes , you went to
league standing sheet . Bowlers would A. check the W-L standings, B. Lane Assignments for that night C. Average of yourself and fellow bowlers
D. If you were in 1st place, you would certainly look at who the 2nd place team was bowling that evening. It was a very competitive scratch league.

So just a creature of habit to check standings in MLB as bowling leagues over all those years.
But, in most leagues, they are split up in quarters, with $$$ being paid out for all 4 quarter winners. In this case, yes, monitoring standing every week is normal.
Standings don’t matter but wins and losses do. Giving away winnable games in April matter just as much as giving away games in September. How many winnable games did the cardinals lose in April and may last season that could have helped? If they lose a play off spot by a couple of games this season yea those two extra inning games the bullpen choked away mattered even if it was April
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 9618
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by rockondlouie »

Way to lay a turd Shildt's Padres vs the scrubbies :x
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 5945
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by scoutyjones2 »

ramfandan wrote: 05 Apr 2025 20:52 pm Reds defeat Brewers 11-7 tonight. Pirates also lose.
Cubs best Padres

In one of those quirky math stats, St. Louis trails Cubs by one game though have 3 losses to Cubs 4 as Chicago havve played 11 games 7-4 record. cards are 4-3 in 7 games.

Brewers after opening 0-4 were on a 4 game win streak 4-4
With tonight’s loss now going to 4-5 record .
It's not quirky math stats :roll:
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4205
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by ramfandan »

RamFan08NY wrote: 06 Apr 2025 08:29 am
ramfandan wrote: 06 Apr 2025 08:05 am Think that(checking standings ) comes from my bowling background. In our major leauge , it was a 32 week season. 96 total games. The games in September were as important as the games in late April. Each week bowlers came to the lanes , you went to
league standing sheet . Bowlers would A. check the W-L standings, B. Lane Assignments for that night C. Average of yourself and fellow bowlers
D. If you were in 1st place, you would certainly look at who the 2nd place team was bowling that evening. It was a very competitive scratch league.

So just a creature of habit to check standings in MLB as bowling leagues over all those years.
But, in most leagues, they are split up in quarters, with $$$ being paid out for all 4 quarter winners. In this case, yes, monitoring standing every week is normal.
Since I go back to 70’s 80 ‘s fir thise leagues, back then it was straight 96 games with most wins at end league champ.
Then sometime in 90’s our league went to two halves ..48 games each. Each half winner rolled off 3 games at end.
No quarters ever used while I bowled .
ilcubuffs
Forum User
Posts: 633
Joined: 30 May 2024 16:48 pm

Re: NL Central : Cards trail Cubs despite fewer losses

Post by ilcubuffs »

Watched Dubs vs Pads. Barley 50 F and Midwest cloud cover. Pads just not really in game.

Carson Kelly, name ring a bell ? - Cub catcher, 2-3 - 4 RBi. .467 Avg & 1.658 OPS. Even in T Ball never thought he could achieve such numbers even if only 11 games.
Post Reply