The one thing that really has to sting for Edmonton, RE: Offer sheets,

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 850
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: The one thing that really has to sting for Edmonton, RE: Offer sheets,

Post by bluetunehead »

Harold_Melvin wrote: 04 Apr 2025 17:45 pm Not signing at least Holloway is mind boggling. Why hadn't Edmonton provided qualifying offers to prevent this situation? I don't know all the ins and outs but isn't that what prevents a team from offering...the sheet/contract. I know they have to sign McJesus and Dria but come on...qualifying offers would have surely been less than the offer sheets. Correct me if I'm not understanding this correctly.
Qualifying offers weren’t the issue. They both got them (and rejected them, as is their right). If they hadn’t received QOs then they would have become UFAs and Edmonton would have gotten nothing for them at all. The qualifying offers just meant that Edmonton kept their rights.

The issue is that Edmonton prioritized spending their cap space on outside free agents like Jeff Skinner, under the assumption that they could get Broberg and Holloway signed cheaply later in the summer. When the Blues came in offering substantial raises that Edmonton couldn’t afford, they were screwed.
moose-and-squirrel
Forum User
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am

Re: The one thing that really has to sting for Edmonton, RE: Offer sheets,

Post by moose-and-squirrel »

bluetunehead wrote: 05 Apr 2025 15:49 pm
Harold_Melvin wrote: 04 Apr 2025 17:45 pm Not signing at least Holloway is mind boggling. Why hadn't Edmonton provided qualifying offers to prevent this situation? I don't know all the ins and outs but isn't that what prevents a team from offering...the sheet/contract. I know they have to sign McJesus and Dria but come on...qualifying offers would have surely been less than the offer sheets. Correct me if I'm not understanding this correctly.
Qualifying offers weren’t the issue. They both got them (and rejected them, as is their right). If they hadn’t received QOs then they would have become UFAs and Edmonton would have gotten nothing for them at all. The qualifying offers just meant that Edmonton kept their rights.

The issue is that Edmonton prioritized spending their cap space on outside free agents like Jeff Skinner, under the assumption that they could get Broberg and Holloway signed cheaply later in the summer. When the Blues came in offering substantial raises that Edmonton couldn’t afford, they were screwed.
well summarized.. will add that judging by their qualifiers, this told both of them what the organization thought of them. very low ball offers that the team thought they'd HAVE to take
Harold_Melvin
Forum User
Posts: 750
Joined: 02 Dec 2023 20:49 pm

Re: The one thing that really has to sting for Edmonton, RE: Offer sheets,

Post by Harold_Melvin »

bluetunehead wrote: 05 Apr 2025 15:49 pm
Harold_Melvin wrote: 04 Apr 2025 17:45 pm Not signing at least Holloway is mind boggling. Why hadn't Edmonton provided qualifying offers to prevent this situation? I don't know all the ins and outs but isn't that what prevents a team from offering...the sheet/contract. I know they have to sign McJesus and Dria but come on...qualifying offers would have surely been less than the offer sheets. Correct me if I'm not understanding this correctly.
Qualifying offers weren’t the issue. They both got them (and rejected them, as is their right). If they hadn’t received QOs then they would have become UFAs and Edmonton would have gotten nothing for them at all. The qualifying offers just meant that Edmonton kept their rights.

The issue is that Edmonton prioritized spending their cap space on outside free agents like Jeff Skinner, under the assumption that they could get Broberg and Holloway signed cheaply later in the summer. When the Blues came in offering substantial raises that Edmonton couldn’t afford, they were screwed.
Thank you for the clarification.
Post Reply