The range of emotion this brings out in people is interesting, and is all agenda filling.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 22:34 pmIt still baffles me when folks are shocked/outraged/disgusted when professional sports team owners make moves to increase profits. They will always choose that path, or they will be replaced.desertrat23 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 21:49 pmIt would be irresponsible not to.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 19:18 pmThe fact that the pro teams spent a fortune on ads to get this passed shows that they are all in on profiteering any way they can.desertrat23 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 17:28 pmCan't legislate morality.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 17:21 pm I have never bet on sports, I don't approve of betting on sports. Baseball gets dirtier all the time.
We should want the Cardinals to do well with revenues. I'd suggest that they went too long
with counting on ticket sales, thinking they were doing good enough. The Cardinals, and most teams,
spend to their margins and that's it.
Good business knows what drives revenue is a product that is desired. Zero reason to think Bill does not care
about people wanting his product. More people gamble on if they have interest.
My great grandparents could gamble on anything they wanted to or not nothing new.
Why do we think it's dirty now or will "hurt poor people" more likely to hurt middle income.