I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
C-Herrera
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson
Bench = Pages, Baker, Barrero, ?
SP-Gray
SP-Fedde
SP-Mikolas
SP-Matz
SP-?
RP = Helsley, Romero, Fernandez, Maton, Libby, King, Roycroft, Leahy
I think Noot starts out in CF because that's the only way to get Gorman, Walker and Burleson in the lineup.
Gorman and Walker are going to play almost everyday, and I don't see them benching Burly against RH.
So, My guess is Siani gets the 4th OF spot so Scott can play everyday in Memphis.
The 5th SP will be Pallante, but I see McGreevy getting plenty of starts this year.
The only thing remaining is how they get Barrero on the 40man.
Thompson to 60 day IL or place someone on waivers.
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson
Bench = Pages, Baker, Barrero, ?
SP-Gray
SP-Fedde
SP-Mikolas
SP-Matz
SP-?
RP = Helsley, Romero, Fernandez, Maton, Libby, King, Roycroft, Leahy
I think Noot starts out in CF because that's the only way to get Gorman, Walker and Burleson in the lineup.
Gorman and Walker are going to play almost everyday, and I don't see them benching Burly against RH.
So, My guess is Siani gets the 4th OF spot so Scott can play everyday in Memphis.
The 5th SP will be Pallante, but I see McGreevy getting plenty of starts this year.
The only thing remaining is how they get Barrero on the 40man.
Thompson to 60 day IL or place someone on waivers.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
good synopsiswkycards wrote: ↑16 Mar 2025 21:11 pm C-Herrera
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson
Bench = Pages, Baker, Barrero, ?
SP-Gray
SP-Fedde
SP-Mikolas
SP-Matz
SP-?
RP = Helsley, Romero, Fernandez, Maton, Libby, King, Roycroft, Leahy
I think Noot starts out in CF because that's the only way to get Gorman, Walker and Burleson in the lineup.
Gorman and Walker are going to play almost everyday, and I don't see them benching Burly against RH.
So, My guess is Siani gets the 4th OF spot so Scott can play everyday in Memphis.
The 5th SP will be Pallante, but I see McGreevy getting plenty of starts this year.
The only thing remaining is how they get Barrero on the 40man.
Thompson to 60 day IL or place someone on waivers.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1681
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
C-Herrera, Pages
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson, Baker
Bench OF = Siani vs Scott vs Barrero vsHelman vs Koperniak vs Vilade
Scott had a nice spring but since we have Nootbar in CF, I agree with the OP; go with Siani and let Scott play every day in Memphis.
Siani does play a lot because he replaces Walker in late innings for defense, and plays when an outfielder needs a day off.
Bench IF = Fermin vs Barrero vsSaggese vs Helman
Barrero is not on the 40-man which hurts his chances. Fermin is also outhitting him in ST.
I think they go with Fermin, but Fermin doesn't get to play much. If they go with Barrero, then they should play him.
Both deserve a better chance to be a MLB bench guy than they have received so far.
SP-Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante
RP = Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Romero, King, Libby, Roycroft, Leahy
It is a rare thing when a team has no pitchers on the IL. Usually there are at least 3.
I see Maton opening the season on the IL since he hasn't pitched yet. Until he's ready, let McGreevy piggyback Pallante's starts.
Memphis
C Crooks, Collins
1B,DH Pozo, Vilade
2B Saggese, Helman
SS Barrero
3B Prieto, Mendoza
OF Koperniak, Scott, Torres, Antico
SP Mathews, Robberse, Munoz, Bedell, Graceffo, Hence
RP O'Brien, Granillo, Ralston, Garcia, Loutos, Heredia, Shreve (they have a bunch of AAAA guys, too, but the IL will open up spots)
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson, Baker
Bench OF = Siani vs Scott vs Barrero vs
Scott had a nice spring but since we have Nootbar in CF, I agree with the OP; go with Siani and let Scott play every day in Memphis.
Siani does play a lot because he replaces Walker in late innings for defense, and plays when an outfielder needs a day off.
Bench IF = Fermin vs Barrero vs
Barrero is not on the 40-man which hurts his chances. Fermin is also outhitting him in ST.
I think they go with Fermin, but Fermin doesn't get to play much. If they go with Barrero, then they should play him.
Both deserve a better chance to be a MLB bench guy than they have received so far.
SP-Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante
RP = Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Romero, King, Libby, Roycroft, Leahy
It is a rare thing when a team has no pitchers on the IL. Usually there are at least 3.
I see Maton opening the season on the IL since he hasn't pitched yet. Until he's ready, let McGreevy piggyback Pallante's starts.
Memphis
C Crooks, Collins
1B,DH Pozo, Vilade
2B Saggese, Helman
SS Barrero
3B Prieto, Mendoza
OF Koperniak, Scott, Torres, Antico
SP Mathews, Robberse, Munoz, Bedell, Graceffo, Hence
RP O'Brien, Granillo, Ralston, Garcia, Loutos, Heredia, Shreve (they have a bunch of AAAA guys, too, but the IL will open up spots)
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 17095
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
I think there’s a good chance both Siani & Scott make the roster. If not, it’s Scott.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
Nice write up. Cool you added Memphis.cardstatman wrote: ↑20 Mar 2025 19:46 pm C-Herrera, Pages
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson, Baker
Bench OF = Siani vs Scott vs Barrero vsHelmanvsKoperniakvsVilade
Scott had a nice spring but since we have Nootbar in CF, I agree with the OP; go with Siani and let Scott play every day in Memphis.
Siani does play a lot because he replaces Walker in late innings for defense, and plays when an outfielder needs a day off.
Bench IF = Fermin vs Barrero vsSaggesevsHelman
Barrero is not on the 40-man which hurts his chances. Fermin is also outhitting him in ST.
I think they go with Fermin, but Fermin doesn't get to play much. If they go with Barrero, then they should play him.
Both deserve a better chance to be a MLB bench guy than they have received so far.
SP-Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante
RP = Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Romero, King, Libby, Roycroft, Leahy
It is a rare thing when a team has no pitchers on the IL. Usually there are at least 3.
I see Maton opening the season on the IL since he hasn't pitched yet. Until he's ready, let McGreevy piggyback Pallante's starts.
Memphis
C Crooks, Collins
1B,DH Pozo, Vilade
2B Saggese, Helman
SS Barrero
3B Prieto, Mendoza
OF Koperniak, Scott, Torres, Antico
SP Mathews, Robberse, Munoz, Bedell, Graceffo, Hence
RP O'Brien, Granillo, Ralston, Garcia, Loutos, Heredia, Shreve (they have a bunch of AAAA guys, too, but the IL will open up spots)
I'm starting to lean more to Fermin, but still not sure what they will do.
Also, I'm still sticking to my Siani over Scott because of Gorman, Walker and Burleson playing everyday.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
Fermin has likely moved ahead of Barrero.wkycards wrote: ↑16 Mar 2025 21:11 pm C-Herrera
1B-Contreras
2B-Gorman
SS-Winn
3B-Arenado
LF-Donovan
CF-Nootbaar
RF-Walker
DH-Burleson
Bench = Pages, Baker, Barrero, ?
SP-Gray
SP-Fedde
SP-Mikolas
SP-Matz
SP-?
RP = Helsley, Romero, Fernandez, Maton, Libby, King, Roycroft, Leahy
I think Noot starts out in CF because that's the only way to get Gorman, Walker and Burleson in the lineup.
Gorman and Walker are going to play almost everyday, and I don't see them benching Burly against RH.
So, My guess is Siani gets the 4th OF spot so Scott can play everyday in Memphis.
The 5th SP will be Pallante, but I see McGreevy getting plenty of starts this year.
The only thing remaining is how they get Barrero on the 40man.
Thompson to 60 day IL or place someone on waivers.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1681
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
I could see Siani vs Scott going either way.
I actually think it would be GOOD for the kids to only start 4-5 games a week.
Avoid overexposure and mental fatigue and give them more time to adjust back as the league adjusts to them.
C Herrera 108, Pages 54
1B Contreras 144, Baker 18
2B Gorman 126, Fermin/Barrero 36
SS Winn 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
3B Arenado 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
LF Donovan 126, Nootbar 36
CF Scott/Siani/Barrero 90, Nootbar 72
RF Walker 126, Nootbar 36
DH Burleson 108, Baker 54
Starts per player
144 Arenado, Contreras, Winn, Nootbar
126 Donovan, Gorman, Walker
108 Burleson, Herrera
90 Scott/Siani/Barrero
72 Baker, Fermin/Barrero
54 Pages
I'm sitting Donovan and Burleson against LHP. Donovan isn't awful against them, but he's not good. Burleson is awful.
I actually think it would be GOOD for the kids to only start 4-5 games a week.
Avoid overexposure and mental fatigue and give them more time to adjust back as the league adjusts to them.
C Herrera 108, Pages 54
1B Contreras 144, Baker 18
2B Gorman 126, Fermin/Barrero 36
SS Winn 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
3B Arenado 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
LF Donovan 126, Nootbar 36
CF Scott/Siani/Barrero 90, Nootbar 72
RF Walker 126, Nootbar 36
DH Burleson 108, Baker 54
Starts per player
144 Arenado, Contreras, Winn, Nootbar
126 Donovan, Gorman, Walker
108 Burleson, Herrera
90 Scott/Siani/Barrero
72 Baker, Fermin/Barrero
54 Pages
I'm sitting Donovan and Burleson against LHP. Donovan isn't awful against them, but he's not good. Burleson is awful.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:43 pm
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
I agree. I think it's good to wean guys into the Bigs sometimes. If Scott bumps Siani (I think he should), he can still get plenty of MLB ABs as a 4th OFer. Many teams have a 4th OFer who gets plenty of ABs. Especially with the DH!cardstatman wrote: ↑20 Mar 2025 20:19 pm I could see Siani vs Scott going either way.
I actually think it would be GOOD for the kids to only start 4-5 games a week.
Avoid overexposure and mental fatigue and give them more time to adjust back as the league adjusts to them.
C Herrera 108, Pages 54
1B Contreras 144, Baker 18
2B Gorman 126, Fermin/Barrero 36
SS Winn 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
3B Arenado 144, Fermin/Barrero 18
LF Donovan 126, Nootbar 36
CF Scott/Siani/Barrero 90, Nootbar 72
RF Walker 126, Nootbar 36
DH Burleson 108, Baker 54
Starts per player
144 Arenado, Contreras, Winn, Nootbar
126 Donovan, Gorman, Walker
108 Burleson, Herrera
90 Scott/Siani/Barrero
72 Baker, Fermin/Barrero
54 Pages
I'm sitting Donovan and Burleson against LHP. Donovan isn't awful against them, but he's not good. Burleson is awful.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 696
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
A lot of good information presented in this thread. All I will add is unless he completely crashes the next week leaving Scott in AAA is a sin. He outplayed every other OFer on the team this spring.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
To not move any of the starters, even for peanuts, to clear the way for both Pallante and McGreevy to be in the rotation says a lot about their stated goals for this year.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
I seem to think that Fermin got the job over Barrero. If we bring Barrero north, we've got to keep him all year. Read an article here on that.
Feels like Siani will probably get the nod.
Also saw that Pallante is going north and in the rotation. I think it's coming down to McGreevy v. another relief pitcher. Maybe Roycroft.
Feels like Siani will probably get the nod.
Also saw that Pallante is going north and in the rotation. I think it's coming down to McGreevy v. another relief pitcher. Maybe Roycroft.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
Whatever the cards START with on OD and in April, it doesn’t matter.
If things falter in April, get ready.
It’s all about pitching. If the pitching begins to break, expect changes soon.
If things falter in April, get ready.
It’s all about pitching. If the pitching begins to break, expect changes soon.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
Starting Nootbaar in CF is stupid for 3 reasons. First, it leaves no room for Scott, who supposedly is the future. Why not find out whether the future is now in a so-called reset? Second, Nootbaar has been beset with injuries in his short career, and playing CF will expose him to more than in LF. Third, he's not that great in CF.
And what is so great about Burly? Let Gorman mostly DH and Donovan play 2B. It might even help Gorman if he can focus more on hitting, because obviously that needs focus. Burly can be a bench bat who can back up at corner OF or 1B or DH. He'll still probably get plenty of PAs in that role.
And Donovan does not need to face a lot of LHP. He has 0 HRs in his career vs. LHP. Is that what you want in an everyday corner OF?
And what is so great about Burly? Let Gorman mostly DH and Donovan play 2B. It might even help Gorman if he can focus more on hitting, because obviously that needs focus. Burly can be a bench bat who can back up at corner OF or 1B or DH. He'll still probably get plenty of PAs in that role.
And Donovan does not need to face a lot of LHP. He has 0 HRs in his career vs. LHP. Is that what you want in an everyday corner OF?
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
unless they go with 6-man rotationStrummer Jones wrote: ↑20 Mar 2025 22:16 pm I seem to think that Fermin got the job over Barrero. If we bring Barrero north, we've got to keep him all year. Read an article here on that.
Feels like Siani will probably get the nod.
Also saw that Pallante is going north and in the rotation. I think it's coming down to McGreevy v. another relief pitcher. Maybe Roycroft.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 23 May 2024 19:50 pm
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
RE Scott- all 4th outfielders are not equal; the Cardinals tend to spread out starts among 10-12 players more than other orgs. therefore, it is my opion that Scott's 300 plate appearances vs Major League Pitching would be more valuable for him than 450-500 plate appearances at AAA. The disparity between MLB and AAA pitching is vast. IMO if Scott starts opening day as #4 he eventually moves into the top 3.
Re: I guess we're down to Scott v Siani and Pallante v McGreevy
^^^^^^^^^^^^^icon wrote: ↑20 Mar 2025 23:24 pm Starting Nootbaar in CF is stupid for 3 reasons. First, it leaves no room for Scott, who supposedly is the future. Why not find out whether the future is now in a so-called reset? Second, Nootbaar has been beset with injuries in his short career, and playing CF will expose him to more than in LF. Third, he's not that great in CF.
And what is so great about Burly? Let Gorman mostly DH and Donovan play 2B. It might even help Gorman if he can focus more on hitting, because obviously that needs focus. Burly can be a bench bat who can back up at corner OF or 1B or DH. He'll still probably get plenty of PAs in that role.
And Donovan does not need to face a lot of LHP. He has 0 HRs in his career vs. LHP. Is that what you want in an everyday corner OF?
Scott earned that everyday cf job. So we are going to send him down without giving him another shot because we don't want to move around a bunch of platoon players? Did anyone read the rankings of the first 5 tiers of major league starters?