Oh completely agree, if they kept piddling along at a .500 pace, no question. Ride this heater out and see where it takes us. If we still fall short then so be it
10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
They beat Utah and Chicago and then the 1-1 part of that 4 game run was Edmonton (overtime) and Florida, a 1 goal loss.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 09:58 amI wouldn't say they were playing poorly, but they weren't playing this good, at least not in my opinion.
Right now there hasn't been a game since that tournament, other than the Dallas game and that had as much to do with fatigue as anything, that the Blues have been outplayed. They are absolutely dominating time of possession, shots on goal, rushes, and high danger chances.
Hell the MVP of the Blues season might very well end up being Don Sweeney.
If he holds onto Monty until the end of the season I sincerely doubt we are in this position. Bannister had them playing to not lose, Monty has them playing to win.
But the fore checking and hounding began right then, all this following immediately after a 4 game losing streak.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Yeah I can agree that they were starting to set down the game plan, but the time off let them solidify and fully implement it.dhsux wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 11:58 amThey beat Utah and Chicago and then the 1-1 part of that 4 game run was Edmonton (overtime) and Florida, a 1 goal loss.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 09:58 amI wouldn't say they were playing poorly, but they weren't playing this good, at least not in my opinion.
Right now there hasn't been a game since that tournament, other than the Dallas game and that had as much to do with fatigue as anything, that the Blues have been outplayed. They are absolutely dominating time of possession, shots on goal, rushes, and high danger chances.
Hell the MVP of the Blues season might very well end up being Don Sweeney.
If he holds onto Monty until the end of the season I sincerely doubt we are in this position. Bannister had them playing to not lose, Monty has them playing to win.
But the fore checking and hounding began right then, all this following immediately after a 4 game losing streak.
If we don't get that break I'm not sure that they reach this level.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Monty had the coaching staff treat it as training camp. Albeit an accelerated training camp...TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 12:05 pmYeah I can agree that they were starting to set down the game plan, but the time off let them solidify and fully implement it.dhsux wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 11:58 amThey beat Utah and Chicago and then the 1-1 part of that 4 game run was Edmonton (overtime) and Florida, a 1 goal loss.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 09:58 amI wouldn't say they were playing poorly, but they weren't playing this good, at least not in my opinion.
Right now there hasn't been a game since that tournament, other than the Dallas game and that had as much to do with fatigue as anything, that the Blues have been outplayed. They are absolutely dominating time of possession, shots on goal, rushes, and high danger chances.
Hell the MVP of the Blues season might very well end up being Don Sweeney.
If he holds onto Monty until the end of the season I sincerely doubt we are in this position. Bannister had them playing to not lose, Monty has them playing to win.
But the fore checking and hounding began right then, all this following immediately after a 4 game losing streak.
If we don't get that break I'm not sure that they reach this level.
But I honestly think the one thing that happened to change this team's attitude over the break was what Binnington and Parayko did during the 4 Nations. Those two are the cornerstones for this team - and they rose to the challenge. For the guys who haven't played with Binner in a "must win" they witnessed first hand that he is money. The younger guys, the guys who missed the playoff run ... now know what they have back there and they are playing on their toes. They are playing with pressure. Same with "Beast". When he absolutely dummied JT Miller in the first US / Canada game, he sent a message to the Blues too.
I don't think you can overlook what those guys did and how that has impacted what we're watching right now.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
The Fowler deal looks like Grand Theft right now.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Really, if the Blues make the playoffs with no Parayko after a coaching change, Thomas and Broberg injuries, and the Steal of the Century Army may well get the GM of the year award he richly deserves. The Fowler pickup was inspired and sometimes the best trades are the ones that don't get made.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 569
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 446
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
I have a lot of respect for some of the posters who were hoping for a losing streak to garner a top 10 pick. I didn’t necessarily agree with them, but I understood their points. My concern with them losing, though, was that likely meant our young guys were failing and I thought that was a bad precedent.
Yes, Schenn, Buch, Faulk and Binny have been better, but so too have Thomas, Neighbours, Toropchenko, Tucker, and Bolduc. And Holloway and Kyrou have continued their top end play. These games mean something and the young guys have risen to the challenge. That you have your future core playing this well, at this time, may actually provide more impact in the future than the guy you could have drafted four or five slots higher this Sunner. We’ll see.
Yes, Schenn, Buch, Faulk and Binny have been better, but so too have Thomas, Neighbours, Toropchenko, Tucker, and Bolduc. And Holloway and Kyrou have continued their top end play. These games mean something and the young guys have risen to the challenge. That you have your future core playing this well, at this time, may actually provide more impact in the future than the guy you could have drafted four or five slots higher this Sunner. We’ll see.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 655
- Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
But, but, but guys, he's going to cost us a 2nd round pick in 2027. OMG, that's going to destroy the rebuild!

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 630
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
It's scary.2forDiving wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:51 pm I have a lot of respect for some of the posters who were hoping for a losing streak to garner a top 10 pick. I didn’t necessarily agree with them, but I understood their points. My concern with them losing, though, was that likely meant our young guys were failing and I thought that was a bad precedent.
Yes, Schenn, Buch, Faulk and Binny have been better, but so too have Thomas, Neighbours, Toropchenko, Tucker, and Bolduc. And Holloway and Kyrou have continued their top end play. These games mean something and the young guys have risen to the challenge. That you have your future core playing this well, at this time, may actually provide more impact in the future than the guy you could have drafted four or five slots higher this Sunner. We’ll see.
Once you invite a losing culture into a locker room (because you choose to tank).....it can be a very long time before that culture changes back to winning.
Just ask the Sabres. That team is super talented....but they have NO IDEA what it takes to win.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
The players and coaches never tank, they’re playing/coaching for their jobs, it’s the front office that takes away their guns and leaves them with pocketknives. It is tough to get over that hump the first time though, I’ll agree with that.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:58 pmIt's scary.2forDiving wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:51 pm I have a lot of respect for some of the posters who were hoping for a losing streak to garner a top 10 pick. I didn’t necessarily agree with them, but I understood their points. My concern with them losing, though, was that likely meant our young guys were failing and I thought that was a bad precedent.
Yes, Schenn, Buch, Faulk and Binny have been better, but so too have Thomas, Neighbours, Toropchenko, Tucker, and Bolduc. And Holloway and Kyrou have continued their top end play. These games mean something and the young guys have risen to the challenge. That you have your future core playing this well, at this time, may actually provide more impact in the future than the guy you could have drafted four or five slots higher this Sunner. We’ll see.
Once you invite a losing culture into a locker room (because you choose to tank).....it can be a very long time before that culture changes back to winning.
Just ask the Sabres. That team is super talented....but they have NO IDEA what it takes to win.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 655
- Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Agree about the players & the coach. Here's the ugly part about tanking or hoping to lose to improve draft position. In that situation the players know that the ownership & the GM want them to play hard, give it their best effort, show what they have, etc. but hope their efforts result in a loss. You can say that players know it's a business & they should look past that, but like Bubble said, you're inviting a losing culture.netboy65 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 15:08 pmThe players and coaches never tank, they’re playing/coaching for their jobs, it’s the front office that takes away their guns and leaves them with pocketknives. It is tough to get over that hump the first time though, I’ll agree with that.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:58 pmIt's scary.2forDiving wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:51 pm I have a lot of respect for some of the posters who were hoping for a losing streak to garner a top 10 pick. I didn’t necessarily agree with them, but I understood their points. My concern with them losing, though, was that likely meant our young guys were failing and I thought that was a bad precedent.
Yes, Schenn, Buch, Faulk and Binny have been better, but so too have Thomas, Neighbours, Toropchenko, Tucker, and Bolduc. And Holloway and Kyrou have continued their top end play. These games mean something and the young guys have risen to the challenge. That you have your future core playing this well, at this time, may actually provide more impact in the future than the guy you could have drafted four or five slots higher this Sunner. We’ll see.
Once you invite a losing culture into a locker room (because you choose to tank).....it can be a very long time before that culture changes back to winning.
Just ask the Sabres. That team is super talented....but they have NO IDEA what it takes to win.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Thing is this team has been tight with each other since day one.
It's been reported by Kelley and Rivers and many players how much they like each other and how they play for each other and you can see that with the unselfish action on the ice for proof. Almost to a fault.
There were a few stinkers along the way but it's been a great year to watch this team play........it's also been a process and we are just now seeing them figure some big things out real time.
Great to see.
It's been reported by Kelley and Rivers and many players how much they like each other and how they play for each other and you can see that with the unselfish action on the ice for proof. Almost to a fault.
There were a few stinkers along the way but it's been a great year to watch this team play........it's also been a process and we are just now seeing them figure some big things out real time.
Great to see.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
They took a lot of lumps and growing pains early in the season. What they are doing now is what you ideally want to see ANY team do, bond, support each other, and constantly strive to improve. It's a healthy mix of veterans and young players, and players like Thomas and Kyrou who were challenged to take the reins. It's my belief it's much easier to build off a solid culture than it is to tear down and get into a cycle of losing where as soon as players mature you sell them off for futures.dhsux wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 16:11 pm Thing is this team has been tight with each other since day one.
It's been reported by Kelley and Rivers and many players how much they like each other and how they play for each other and you can see that with the unselfish action on the ice for proof. Almost to a fault.
There were a few stinkers along the way but it's been a great year to watch this team play........it's also been a process and we are just now seeing them figure some big things out real time.
Great to see.
Re: 10-3-3 in last 16 ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!
Also his jumping on the hire of Monty without hesitation.DawgDad wrote: ↑17 Mar 2025 14:43 pm Really, if the Blues make the playoffs with no Parayko after a coaching change, Thomas and Broberg injuries, and the Steal of the Century Army may well get the GM of the year award he richly deserves. The Fowler pickup was inspired and sometimes the best trades are the ones that don't get made.