The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Bacchk29
Forum User
Posts: 1014
Joined: 29 Apr 2019 07:24 am

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by Bacchk29 »

93 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:36 pm
son_of_foolsgold wrote: 26 Jan 2025 08:25 am I told most of you fools what a stupid move it was to waste future assets on Fowler. Ever since that 1000th game ceremony
he has been terrible, and he hasn't prevented the Blues from falling hopelessly out of the playoff picture.

So tell me, do you regret it now? Army should.
There is no regret for that trade at all.

Would you rather be sending out Kessel or Perunovich for the amount of minutes that Fowler has logged since getting here. I know I wouldn't, and to my knowledge Fowler has put up a decent amount of goals and points since getting here as well.

Fowler is signed also through next season on a decent contract with what the Ducks are picking up.
Unless Army flips him at the deadline to get his pick back plus, it’s a waste of assets
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 921
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by a smell of green grass »

Fowler was the PERFECT pick-up by Army. He ensures that the Blues play competitively this year, and the fans got to see a 1000-game ceremony. Plus, he ensures that the Blues don't pick anywhere near the top of the draft.

The goal of the Blues organization is to keep costs and risks down, while "making the playoffs".

Army will get EVERYTHING he wants if the Blues make the playoffs. If they get blown out and embarrassed in the playoffs, that is shooting PAR for him. The Blues fans are fine with that--as their history shows.
Chubbs0910
Forum User
Posts: 3000
Joined: 24 May 2018 18:01 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by Chubbs0910 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:53 pm Fowler was the PERFECT pick-up by Army. He ensures that the Blues play competitively this year, and the fans got to see a 1000-game ceremony. Plus, he ensures that the Blues don't pick anywhere near the top of the draft.

The goal of the Blues organization is to keep costs and risks down, while "making the playoffs".

Army will get EVERYTHING he wants if the Blues make the playoffs. If they get blown out and embarrassed in the playoffs, that is shooting PAR for him. The Blues fans are fine with that--as their history shows.
Generally agree. Fowler made them respectable at least. Without him the LHD was barely NHL caliber.
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

son_of_foolsgold wrote: 26 Jan 2025 08:25 am I told most of you fools what a stupid move it was to waste future assets on Fowler. Ever since that 1000th game ceremony
he has been terrible, and he hasn't prevented the Blues from falling hopelessly out of the playoff picture.

So tell me, do you regret it now? Army should.
Army lies and mismanages. This board laps it up like little puppies. They are truth-averse.
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:53 pm Fowler was the PERFECT pick-up by Army. He ensures that the Blues play competitively this year, and the fans got to see a 1000-game ceremony. Plus, he ensures that the Blues don't pick anywhere near the top of the draft.

The goal of the Blues organization is to keep costs and risks down, while "making the playoffs".

Army will get EVERYTHING he wants if the Blues make the playoffs. If they get blown out and embarrassed in the playoffs, that is shooting PAR for him. The Blues fans are fine with that--as their history shows.
You are an idiot. Fit right in here! lol
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

Army's Mom wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:45 pm
93 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:36 pm
son_of_foolsgold wrote: 26 Jan 2025 08:25 am I told most of you fools what a stupid move it was to waste future assets on Fowler. Ever since that 1000th game ceremony
he has been terrible, and he hasn't prevented the Blues from falling hopelessly out of the playoff picture.

So tell me, do you regret it now? Army should.
There is no regret for that trade at all.

Would you rather be sending out Kessel or Perunovich for the amount of minutes that Fowler has logged since getting here. I know I wouldn't, and to my knowledge Fowler has put up a decent amount of goals and points since getting here as well.

Fowler is signed also through next season on a decent contract with what the Ducks are picking up.
If the OP were serious about valuing futures, and not just trying to be a miserable troll, they'd understand that Fowler is worth way more than what Army paid. That means if the Blues decide they're not a playoff team this year, they can sell him for more precious futures than they paid.

Army saw Anaheim in a pickle and took full advantage, paying pennies on the dollar. If Army puts Fowler on the market this deadline, a first isn't out of the question - which defender rumored to be on the market would you rather add as a contender? Provorov?
You def are the new form nut-hugger. Predictable, sanctimonious and dumb as rocks.
LGB73
Forum User
Posts: 229
Joined: 29 May 2024 15:18 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by LGB73 »

Fowler was a mistake. Not that he doesn't make the Blues better because he does. He just wasn't going to get us into the playoffs. So we've given up a decent future asset but more importantly stops us from getting better talent in this year's draft and a lighting bolt of a chance of a top 3 pick.

Ownership needs to get serious about rebuilding
This middle road is the path to longer term pain than accepting a couple years of top 10 picks.
iowa blues fan
Forum User
Posts: 66
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:26 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by iowa blues fan »

LGB73 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 13:37 pm Fowler was a mistake. Not that he doesn't make the Blues better because he does. He just wasn't going to get us into the playoffs. So we've given up a decent future asset but more importantly stops us from getting better talent in this year's draft and a lighting bolt of a chance of a top 3 pick.

Ownership needs to get serious about rebuilding
This middle road is the path to longer term pain than accepting a couple years of top 10 picks.
We gave up no legitimate prospect in the trade.
The 2nd rounder is a loss.
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

LGB73 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 13:37 pm Fowler was a mistake. Not that he doesn't make the Blues better because he does. He just wasn't going to get us into the playoffs. So we've given up a decent future asset but more importantly stops us from getting better talent in this year's draft and a lighting bolt of a chance of a top 3 pick.

Ownership needs to get serious about rebuilding
This middle road is the path to longer term pain than accepting a couple years of top 10 picks.
He prefers to lie and mismanage. It’s clear.
netboy65
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by netboy65 »

LGB73 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 13:37 pm Fowler was a mistake. Not that he doesn't make the Blues better because he does. He just wasn't going to get us into the playoffs. So we've given up a decent future asset but more importantly stops us from getting better talent in this year's draft and a lighting bolt of a chance of a top 3 pick.

Ownership needs to get serious about rebuilding
This middle road is the path to longer term pain than accepting a couple years of top 10 picks.
What decent future asset?
We didn’t give up a top prospect or a first. A second is a 50/50 prop at best, and even if it worked out, how long before that guy is even here?
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:53 pm Fowler was the PERFECT pick-up by Army. He ensures that the Blues play competitively this year, and the fans got to see a 1000-game ceremony. Plus, he ensures that the Blues don't pick anywhere near the top of the draft.

The goal of the Blues organization is to keep costs and risks down, while "making the playoffs".

Army will get EVERYTHING he wants if the Blues make the playoffs. If they get blown out and embarrassed in the playoffs, that is shooting PAR for him. The Blues fans are fine with that--as their history shows.
So you speak for fans? Shut up now.
Aesa
Forum User
Posts: 2415
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:51 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by Aesa »

That was ironically hilarious.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2036
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by TheJackBurton »

You can all but be certain Army will get the 2nd rounder back. Jesus Christ the pearl clutching.
neverchange27
Banned User
Posts: 591
Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by neverchange27 »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Jan 2025 14:39 pm You can all but be certain Army will get the 2nd rounder back. Jesus Christ the pearl clutching.
Get off your cross, Jack.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 3803
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by theograce »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Jan 2025 14:39 pm You can all but be certain Army will get the 2nd rounder back. Jesus Christ the pearl clutching.
That might be relevant in 6 years. Yay!

Sound like the Sabres
Blue Sabbath
Forum User
Posts: 472
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:32 pm

Re: The Fowler waste looks even WORSE than I thought

Post by Blue Sabbath »

neverchange27 wrote: 26 Jan 2025 13:06 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 26 Jan 2025 12:53 pm Fowler was the PERFECT pick-up by Army. He ensures that the Blues play competitively this year, and the fans got to see a 1000-game ceremony. Plus, he ensures that the Blues don't pick anywhere near the top of the draft.

The goal of the Blues organization is to keep costs and risks down, while "making the playoffs".

Army will get EVERYTHING he wants if the Blues make the playoffs. If they get blown out and embarrassed in the playoffs, that is shooting PAR for him. The Blues fans are fine with that--as their history shows.
You are an idiot. Fit right in here! lol
ASOGG's post went right over your low profile head.
Post Reply