STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1517985
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
So how many hitters had a higher combo of .290 BA and .450 % Slugging than Burleson in the NL?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:00 pm
Umm, I think THIS might have helped a little more:
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
Shady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:08 pmSo how many had a higher combo of .290 BA and .450 % Slugging than Burleson in the NL? You think the Cardinals should just DFA Burleson, at 26, and move on from him? LOL You are a funny bunny.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:00 pm
Umm, I think THIS might have helped a little more:
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
Nice comeback, chump.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:13 pmShady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:08 pmSo how many had a higher combo of .290 BA and .450 % Slugging than Burleson in the NL? You think the Cardinals should just DFA Burleson, at 26, and move on from him? LOL You are a funny bunny.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:00 pm
Umm, I think THIS might have helped a little more:
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
Shady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:14 pmNice comeback, chump.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:13 pmShady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:08 pmSo how many had a higher combo of .290 BA and .450 % Slugging than Burleson in the NL? You think the Cardinals should just DFA Burleson, at 26, and move on from him? LOL You are a funny bunny.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:00 pm
Umm, I think THIS might have helped a little more:
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
So do you still feel Burleson is an AAAA type player? If so, why don't the Cardinals just move on from him?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:16 pmShady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:14 pmNice comeback, chump.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:13 pmShady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:08 pmSo how many had a higher combo of .290 BA and .450 % Slugging than Burleson in the NL? You think the Cardinals should just DFA Burleson, at 26, and move on from him? LOL You are a funny bunny.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:00 pm
Umm, I think THIS might have helped a little more:
NYCardsFan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2025 20:19 pm
NL Silver Sluggers
Position/Player (wRC+/OPS+)
DH: Ohtani (172/179)
1B: Alonso (141/144)
OF: Soto (156/160)
OF: Carroll (139/140)
OF: Tucker (136/143)
Finalists for "Utility" Silver Slugger:
DH/1B/OF: Burleson (124/125), -12.4 DEF RAA
2B/SS/OF: Donovan (119/119), -0.1 DEF RAA
1B/2B/SS: Cronenworth (117/108), +1.3 DEF RAA
Burleson, a bat-only defensive liability at lower-value defensive positions, beat out two actual utility players for the "Utility" Silver Slugger Award.
What really helped Burleson is that Utility Silver Slugger is a contrived award a step above a "Participant" ribbon. It also helped his competition were Donovan and Cronenworth. How long will you continue this goofy victory lap? Wait, I know. Through next season, at least.
No, because I never said that.
I contribute by not posting copy and paste articles every hour on the hour! I contribute by not creating OP's that have been discussed over and over again about the same topics! I contribute by having my own thoughts, not some AI article that you find! Wish you would try to contribute a little more like myself there Shadester!
It was probably more like hoping or he has the potential to be “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”. Do you have the exact verbiage in your Shady historical files? Which is a left-handed compliment, by the way. But, none the less, Burleson has progressed nicely. Don't you agree?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:24 pmNo, because I never said that.
Do you still feel Burleson is “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”? Because as many posters have attested and you have admitted, you actually *DID* say that.
“It was probably more like”? So you’re admitting you don’t actually know what you said? Then how can you categorically deny what numerous posters have specifically attested you said?Shady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 18:06 pmIt was probably more like hoping or he has the potential to be “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”. Do you have the exact verbiage in your Shady historical files? Which is a left-handed compliment, by the way. But, none the less, Burleson has progressed nicely. Don't you agree?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:24 pmNo, because I never said that.
Do you still feel Burleson is “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”? Because as many posters have attested and you have admitted, you actually *DID* say that.
One question. Why do you care so much about every detail of what I post? LOLNYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 18:37 pm“It was probably more like”? So you’re admitting you don’t actually know what you said? Then how can you categorically deny what numerous posters have specifically attested you said?Shady wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 18:06 pmIt was probably more like hoping or he has the potential to be “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”. Do you have the exact verbiage in your Shady historical files? Which is a left-handed compliment, by the way. But, none the less, Burleson has progressed nicely. Don't you agree?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:24 pmNo, because I never said that.
Do you still feel Burleson is “the next Tony Gwynn / Joey Votto”? Because as many posters have attested and you have admitted, you actually *DID* say that.
You’d be a disaster on the witness stand, Mable.
Just what do you actually contribute much besides bashing me? Maybe I missed all the brilliant OPs that you might have presented. By the way, I''ll post as I please, dingbat.zuck698 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2025 17:28 pmI contribute by not posting copy and paste articles every hour on the hour! I contribute by not creating OP's that have been discussed over and over again about the same topics! I contribute by having my own thoughts, not some AI article that you find! Wish you would try to contribute a little more like myself there Shadester!