STLtoday.com

The Cardinals need to "hit" on at least one of them as a future MLB contributor. Who's it most likely to be?

No, sorry.

Shady wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 16:59 pm The Cardinals need to "hit" on at least one of them as a future MLB contributor. Who's it most likely to be?

It's been barely more than two weeks since the deadline. Will need time to unfold.

Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

I saw something useful on the Flintstones that might've helped. But PETA might scoff at the pterodactyl abuse

Mort Gage wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:44 pm

Shady wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 16:59 pm The Cardinals need to "hit" on at least one of them as a future MLB contributor. Who's it most likely to be?

It's been barely more than two weeks since the deadline. Will need time to unfold.

We have to see what we have.

Shady wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 16:59 pm The Cardinals need to "hit" on at least one of them as a future MLB contributor. Who's it most likely to be?

Jesus, you're insufferable.

There is some serious incapacitation with you, mentally and emotionally

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Or someone could just share information since this is a discussion forum. Why do so many here have to be (donkey)(censored) when someone asks a question?

JuanAgosto wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 01:00 am

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Or someone could just share information since this is a discussion forum. Why do so many here have to be (donkey)(censored) when someone asks a question?

It's not the question that's the problem. It's the someone asking the question. Sometimes for the 20th or 50th time.

JuanAgosto wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 01:00 am

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Or someone could just share information since this is a discussion forum. Why do so many here have to be (donkey)(censored) when someone asks a question?

Because it’s shady


I regret nothing

Banner29 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 06:59 am

JuanAgosto wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 01:00 am

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Or someone could just share information since this is a discussion forum. Why do so many here have to be (donkey)(censored) when someone asks a question?

Because it’s shady


I regret nothing

Nor should you. Every bit of (bleep) shady catches is earned many times over.

Well, one of them there prospects went hitless the other night, They should DFA him immediately.
Then there was that other one that got a hit. They should bring him up yesterday.

It’s too early to tell. Many very young. Several at lower level in minors needing time to develop.

JuanAgosto wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 01:00 am

Banner29 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 18:54 pm Not sure. Still waiting for someone to invent some sort of technology that allows you to look it up all on your own

Or someone could just share information since this is a discussion forum. Why do so many here have to be (donkey)(censored) when someone asks a question?

I've never understood that type of odd response myself. Gee in a forum dedicated to the Cardinals somebody (the horror of it) asks a question about Cardinals' prospects. And maybe the genius who was critical in this thread will "figure out" the poster did use technology (a computer hooked up to the internet) to ask the question.

Has any Shady thread been impressive? He needs to "hit" on at least one.

It may have been prudent for Mo to have traded for a starting pitcher that had a chance at a spot in the rotation next season. That should have been feasible in a Helsley trade.