Page 1 of 2
McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:20 am
by Goldfan
Why Was he removed after 5?
We saw the aftermath…..Oli needs to let these starters eat if they’re doing well
McGreevy needs to stay in rotation
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:27 am
by Banner29
What the IPad says, goes
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:30 am
by rockondlouie
I've wanted him to replace Pallante for weeks.
Pallante last 11 GS:
5.55 ERA
1.47 WHiP
If he gets smacked around again tonight and Mo doesn't make the switch, then he's even more inept than we thought
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:30 am
by Absolut
According to Caray he hit the important 69 pitch threshold.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:33 am
by imadangman
rockondlouie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:30 am
I've wanted him to replace Pallante for weeks.
Pallante last 11 GS:
5.55 ERA
1.47 WHiP
If he gets smacked around again tonight and Mo doesn't make the switch, then he's even more inept than we thought
At the very least, McGreevy has no business going back to Memphis
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:34 am
by Futuregm2
In 39 MLB innings McGreevy has a 2.27 ERA, 2.57 FIP, and 0.81 WHIP. And I’m sure they’ll find a reason to send him back down.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:36 am
by rockondlouie
imadangman wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:33 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:30 am
I've wanted him to replace Pallante for weeks.
Pallante last 11 GS:
5.55 ERA
1.47 WHiP
If he gets smacked around again tonight and Mo doesn't make the switch, then he's even more inept than we thought
At the very least, McGreevy has no business going back to Memphis
Bingo
Pallante?
Mikolas?
He's better than both of them but for some reason Mo won't make the move.

Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:44 am
by scoutyjones2
15 games in a row over 15 days...
13 games in a row the prior 14 days
I'll do the math...28 games in 29 days
Perspective
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:47 am
by imadangman
rockondlouie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:36 am
imadangman wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:33 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:30 am
I've wanted him to replace Pallante for weeks.
Pallante last 11 GS:
5.55 ERA
1.47 WHiP
If he gets smacked around again tonight and Mo doesn't make the switch, then he's even more inept than we thought
At the very least, McGreevy has no business going back to Memphis
Bingo
Pallante?
Mikolas?
He's better than both of them but for some reason Mo won't make the move.
Pallante might not be bad in a Matz-like bullpen role. Mikolas has me feeling at least semi-confident when he takes the mound.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:49 am
by moose-and-squirrel
it was the White Sox.. might wanna pump the brakes a bit
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:50 am
by scoutyjones2
moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:49 am
it was the White Sox.. might wanna pump the brakes a bit
Noooo!!!
39 innings proves he's Paul Skenes without the side piece

Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:54 am
by sikeston bulldog2
Throwing McG five innings almost cost us. The dumbest move this year. Leading KC 7-2, pulled starter. Dumb.
Mcg needs innings. All starters need innings to grow. The pen needs those innings. Dumb.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:57 am
by scoutyjones2
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:54 am
Throwing McG five innings almost cost us. The dumbest move this year. Leading KC 7-2, pulled starter. Dumb.
Mcg needs innings. All starters need innings to grow. The pen needs those innings. Dumb.
28 games in 29 days...
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 08:59 am
by tyoung12290
moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:49 am
it was the White Sox.. might wanna pump the brakes a bit
Generally agree and dont think he is an ace in the making.. But he also look decent against Dodgers and great against Mets.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 09:02 am
by sikeston bulldog2
scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:57 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:54 am
Throwing McG five innings almost cost us. The dumbest move this year. Leading KC 7-2, pulled starter. Dumb.
Mcg needs innings. All starters need innings to grow. The pen needs those innings. Dumb.
28 games in 29 days...
I know. You’ve made that clear. Still can go more especially if pitch count was the measure. The load wasn’t heavy either. To assist your assertion reference 28 in 29 days, a long outing would assist that endeavor by saving the pen.
Always been my view long stretches require deep starts.
Re: McGreevy Looked Great
Posted: 20 Jun 2025 09:07 am
by scoutyjones2
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 09:02 am
scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:57 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025 08:54 am
Throwing McG five innings almost cost us. The dumbest move this year. Leading KC 7-2, pulled starter. Dumb.
Mcg needs innings. All starters need innings to grow. The pen needs those innings. Dumb.
28 games in 29 days...
I know. You’ve made that clear. Still can go more especially if pitch count was the measure. The load wasn’t heavy either. To assist your assertion reference 28 in 29 days, a long outing would assist that endeavor by saving the pen.
Always been my view long stretches require deep starts.
And if they have another double header? Extra innings? Multiple close games where you lean on 3-4 of your best relievers to catch the Scrubs? Can you guarantee enough opportunities/work for your entire pen without games on the line, to get innings?
I tend to think past the one game and recognize the upcoming schedule and need to get relievers innings. Next we will see complaints that JoJo hasn't pitched in 4 games...