STLtoday.com

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 11:38 am If Anderson, Arquette, and Hernandez are still available at #5. Though he may be a longer term project as a high schooler. I feel Hernandez's upside is the greater. From the video I was really impressed with Billy Carlson obvious athleticism. Carlson seems to have the athletic ability to be very successful at other positions besides SS. Including pitcher.

Adam2 wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:02 pm

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 11:38 am If Anderson, Arquette, and Hernandez are still available at #5. Though he may be a longer term project as a high schooler. I feel Hernandez's upside is the greater. From the video I was really impressed with Billy Carlson obvious athleticism. Carlson seems to have the athletic ability to be very successful at other positions besides SS. Including pitcher.

stop spamming

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:24 pm

Adam2 wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:02 pm

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 11:38 am If Anderson, Arquette, and Hernandez are still available at #5. Though he may be a longer term project as a high schooler. I feel Hernandez's upside is the greater. From the video I was really impressed with Billy Carlson obvious athleticism. Carlson seems to have the athletic ability to be very successful at other positions besides SS. Including pitcher.

stop spamming

Nobody else has offered the actual visual breakdown on the top potential possible picks. If you don't appreciate it, stop bittching and just go somewhere else for your draft info.

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:41 pm extremely misleading posts by Shady here.

There is and has been informative video on all the prospects for some time out there on the internet. Links to 10-12 sites have been given by me, and 20-30 posters who have made replies/posts in the Draft Thread.

As far as "best mock he's ever seen", I assume this MUST BE the first mock that Shady has ever seen. While it's good tool, it's not the best mock...I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean "Best Mock???" Sounds more like a desperate appeal by the OP for attention, acceptance and confirmation.

All mocks have things/nuances that we can learn....this one is no more special than any other...it's not as reputable as your FSS, BA, MLBpipeline, BP, Journal, etc...but it's a good effort.

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 14:49 pm

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:41 pm extremely misleading posts by Shady here.

There is and has been informative video on all the prospects for some time out there on the internet. Links to 10-12 sites have been given by me, and 20-30 posters who have made replies/posts in the Draft Thread.

As far as "best mock he's ever seen", I assume this MUST BE the first mock that Shady has ever seen. While it's good tool, it's not the best mock...I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean "Best Mock???" Sounds more like a desperate appeal by the OP for attention, acceptance and confirmation.

All mocks have things/nuances that we can learn....this one is no more special than any other...it's not as reputable as your FSS, BA, MLBpipeline, BP, Journal, etc...but it's a good effort.

This is an outstanding inclusive prospects video report. I didn't say the best mock, per se. But it's the best collective report I've seen in one video. Like I said. if anybody doesn't appreciate it. Stop bittching about it and just get your draft info someplace else.

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 15:00 pm

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 14:49 pm

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:41 pm extremely misleading posts by Shady here.

There is and has been informative video on all the prospects for some time out there on the internet. Links to 10-12 sites have been given by me, and 20-30 posters who have made replies/posts in the Draft Thread.

As far as "best mock he's ever seen", I assume this MUST BE the first mock that Shady has ever seen. While it's good tool, it's not the best mock...I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean "Best Mock???" Sounds more like a desperate appeal by the OP for attention, acceptance and confirmation.

All mocks have things/nuances that we can learn....this one is no more special than any other...it's not as reputable as your FSS, BA, MLBpipeline, BP, Journal, etc...but it's a good effort.

This is an outstanding inclusive prospects video report. I didn't say the best mock, per se. But it's the best collective report I've seen in one video. Like I said. if anybody doesn't appreciate it. Stop bittching about it and just get your draft info someplace else.

y Shady » 03 Jun 2025 10:21 am

This is the best MLB mock draft information I've seen. And I've seen many. Seth Hernandez looks like he has Paul Skenes potential.


------

you were saying? 4th comment on this page.

and I've seen Hernandez pitch 5 times this spring.....and Paul Skenes never even came close. So please, rid yourself of that comp. They're completely different and reliant on many different pitches.

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 15:32 pm

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 15:00 pm

Shady wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 14:49 pm

craviduce wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 12:41 pm extremely misleading posts by Shady here.

There is and has been informative video on all the prospects for some time out there on the internet. Links to 10-12 sites have been given by me, and 20-30 posters who have made replies/posts in the Draft Thread.

As far as "best mock he's ever seen", I assume this MUST BE the first mock that Shady has ever seen. While it's good tool, it's not the best mock...I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean "Best Mock???" Sounds more like a desperate appeal by the OP for attention, acceptance and confirmation.

All mocks have things/nuances that we can learn....this one is no more special than any other...it's not as reputable as your FSS, BA, MLBpipeline, BP, Journal, etc...but it's a good effort.

This is an outstanding inclusive prospects video report. I didn't say the best mock, per se. But it's the best collective report I've seen in one video. Like I said. if anybody doesn't appreciate it. Stop bittching about it and just get your draft info someplace else.

y Shady » 03 Jun 2025 10:21 am

This is the best MLB mock draft information I've seen. And I've seen many. Seth Hernandez looks like he has Paul Skenes potential.


------

you were saying? 4th comment on this page.

and I've seen Hernandez pitch 5 times this spring.....and Paul Skenes never even came close. So please, rid yourself of that comp. They're completely different and reliant on many different pitches.

Guru, I'll comp whom I feel l like comping. Obviously, Hernandez isn't a Skenes, right now. But Hernandez is only 18 years old a has sometimes thrown 100 mph fast balls. That's the primary comp. Why don't you just stay on your own thread instead of trying to be so dismissive and argumentative on a thread I posted?

Shady wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025 17:31 pm Realistically, there's a decent chance that either Arnold or Hernandez will be available at #5. Arnold would be closer to the bigs as a high end starting pitcher. Hernandez could be a longer range future #1 ace.