luke weaver,go figure
Posted: 22 May 2025 14:30 pm
the guy had glimpses of promise with the cards and thus far this year has been unhittable as the yanks closer...you never know
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1512506
Weaver failed as a starter everywhere before reinventing himself as a relief pitcher.MrPostman01 wrote: ↑22 May 2025 17:06 pm While he was pitching like the Dream Weaver for us on that glorious streak, some Bozos were meh waiting for Flaherty...
Being hot isn’t a sin, nothing she can do about it. Lusting for her is..ClassicO wrote: ↑22 May 2025 17:45 pmYep. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=htt ... AdAAAAABAE
Is "hot Christian girl" oxymoronic?
Weaver was originally rated slightly higher than Flaherty. He showed early promise after the trade to Arizona, so much so that he was projected as their #1 starter. But he never regained form after injuries until achieving success as a reliever last year and so far this year with the Yankees. None of this should be interpreted as an objection to the trade for Goldschmidt.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑22 May 2025 19:01 pmWeaver failed as a starter everywhere before reinventing himself as a relief pitcher.MrPostman01 wrote: ↑22 May 2025 17:06 pm While he was pitching like the Dream Weaver for us on that glorious streak, some Bozos were meh waiting for Flaherty...
Flaherty was and is the better starting pitcher.
Flaherty is 57-46 with a 3.68 era, 1.18 whip, and 1006 strikeouts over 883 career innings.cardiological wrote: ↑22 May 2025 20:06 pmWeaver was originally rated slightly higher than Flaherty. He showed early promise after the trade to Arizona, so much so that he was projected as their #1 starter. But he never regained form after injuries until achieving success as a reliever last year and so far this year with the Yankees. None of this should be interpreted as an objection to the trade for Goldschmidt.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑22 May 2025 19:01 pmWeaver failed as a starter everywhere before reinventing himself as a relief pitcher.MrPostman01 wrote: ↑22 May 2025 17:06 pm While he was pitching like the Dream Weaver for us on that glorious streak, some Bozos were meh waiting for Flaherty...
Flaherty was and is the better starting pitcher.
I don’t disagree. My only point was that by 2017 Weaver had leapfrogged Flaherty as far as Cardinals prospect rankings. (However, I shouldn’t have said “originally” since Flaherty in 2016 had been ranked one slot above Weaver.)JohnnyMO wrote: ↑22 May 2025 21:07 pmFlaherty is 57-46 with a 3.68 era, 1.18 whip, and 1006 strikeouts over 883 career innings.cardiological wrote: ↑22 May 2025 20:06 pmWeaver was originally rated slightly higher than Flaherty. He showed early promise after the trade to Arizona, so much so that he was projected as their #1 starter. But he never regained form after injuries until achieving success as a reliever last year and so far this year with the Yankees. None of this should be interpreted as an objection to the trade for Goldschmidt.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑22 May 2025 19:01 pmWeaver failed as a starter everywhere before reinventing himself as a relief pitcher.MrPostman01 wrote: ↑22 May 2025 17:06 pm While he was pitching like the Dream Weaver for us on that glorious streak, some Bozos were meh waiting for Flaherty...
Flaherty was and is the better starting pitcher.
Weaver is 35-46 with a 4.70 era. 1.35 whip, and 697 strikeouts over 697 innings.
It’s not even close who has been the more valuable pitcher. Weaver seemed like a good guy and it’s great he’s turned himself into a dominant reliever. But he never was as valuable as Flaherty.
Boy, today’s pitchers are injury prone.