Page 1 of 2

Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 16:05 pm
by wkycards
profar.JPG
profar.JPG (31.74 KiB) Viewed 743 times

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 16:18 pm
by riff raff
wkycards wrote: 31 Mar 2025 16:05 pm profar.JPG
Interesting, maybe he's been getting away with it for a while. He sure resurrected his career.

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 16:33 pm
by 82birds
well, we didn't sign ANYONE other than Maton so there wasn't a chance in he!! we'd sign him

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 16:34 pm
by MrPostman01
Profar pro no good.

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 16:35 pm
by thetank2
82birds wrote: 31 Mar 2025 16:33 pm well, we didn't sign ANYONE other than Maton so there wasn't a chance in he!! we'd sign him
No one in FA that would make a difference except Soto.

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:08 pm
by riff raff
82birds wrote: 31 Mar 2025 16:33 pm well, we didn't sign ANYONE other than Maton so there wasn't a chance in he!! we'd sign him
Who did you want?

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:15 pm
by Futuregm2
Rocko called it

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:52 pm
by 3dender
Probably the most conspicuous career year since Luis Gonzalez and his 57 hr :lol:

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:54 pm
by Absolut
We use magic needles when you can use magic bat?

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:55 pm
by craviduce
3dender wrote: 31 Mar 2025 17:52 pm Probably the most conspicuous career year since Luis Gonzalez and his 57 hr :lol:
Brady Anderson's 50 in 1996....21 was his previous high :roll:

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 17:59 pm
by Absolut
craviduce wrote: 31 Mar 2025 17:55 pm
3dender wrote: 31 Mar 2025 17:52 pm Probably the most conspicuous career year since Luis Gonzalez and his 57 hr :lol:
Brady Anderson's 50 in 1996....21 was his previous high :roll:
Age 36 BB hits 73. Never had 50. 🤔

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 18:09 pm
by ecleme22
3dender wrote: 31 Mar 2025 17:52 pm Probably the most conspicuous career year since Luis Gonzalez and his 57 hr :lol:
Gary Matthews Jr

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 18:11 pm
by wkycards
PED
Profarmance Enhancement Drug
:)

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 19:50 pm
by Pink Freud
3dender wrote: 31 Mar 2025 17:52 pm Probably the most conspicuous career year since Luis Gonzalez and his 57 hr :lol:
Or career .500 pitcher Steve Stone suddenly going 25-4 with Baltimore in 1980.

When Profar hits in the .230s.-240s for 4 straight seasons with a total of 37 HRs...then has such an outlier of a career year during his walk season 8O...and puts on that roid-rage stunt taunting Dodgers fans in the LF stands in October...he was almost asking for it.

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 19:51 pm
by Pink Freud
wkycards wrote: 31 Mar 2025 18:11 pm PED
Profarmance Enhancement Drug. :)


No more calls, folks; we have a winner! :lol: 8) :D

Re: Glad we didn't sign Jurickson Profar

Posted: 31 Mar 2025 20:18 pm
by Pink Freud
From today's The Athletic: "Some red flags were raised around baseball, albeit whispers rather than public accusations, after Profar had a career-best season for the San Diego Padres in 2024. But the Braves attributed his power and overall offensive gains to adjustments Profar made with his lower body in his batting stance, after working out with Fernando Tatis Jr. and his dad the previous winter."

ROFLMAO.