So, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
not if the intention is to build a winning team going forward..if the cards were coming off a 95 win season and were a game away from the WS perhaps the question would have some merit...in the current situation obviously not
-
AZ_Cardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 893
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Stop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Nimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticising others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Last edited by Shady on 27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
AZ_Cardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 893
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
[redacted] we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
You. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong. What's your briiiant plan, hotshot?AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
Last edited by Shady on 27 Oct 2025 19:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
AZ_Cardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 893
- Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
You are just too stupid to recognize intelligent plans when discussed. Not my problem that you don't get it. But hey keep posting here is some more attention you obviously crave.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:14 pmYou. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
You are an superiority complex idiot. So what's your plan to obtain a much needed Harper-like slugger. I expect, as usual, very little creativity coming from you.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:16 pmYou are just too stupid to recognize intelligent plans when discussed. Not my problem that you don't get it. But hey keep posting here is some more attention you obviously crave.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:14 pmYou. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
Last edited by Shady on 27 Oct 2025 19:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
The only thing worse than a moron is a sensitive/defensive moron.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:16 pmYou are just too stupid to recognize intelligent plans when discussed. Not my problem that you don't get it. But hey keep posting here is some more attention you obviously crave.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:14 pmYou. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Get lost freaky. You are like a pimple on my (bleep). Your another weak (bleep) dude that is obsessed with ole' Shady's posts. And can't ignore them. Weak, weak, weak..ecleme22 wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:21 pmThe only thing worse than a moron is a sensitive/defensive moron.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:16 pmYou are just too stupid to recognize intelligent plans when discussed. Not my problem that you don't get it. But hey keep posting here is some more attention you obviously crave.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:14 pmYou. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.
-
MIDMOBIRDTWO
- Forum User
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
He is not paranoid. But everybody is out to get him. Cannot fix him.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:16 pmYou are just too stupid to recognize intelligent plans when discussed. Not my problem that you don't get it. But hey keep posting here is some more attention you obviously crave.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:14 pmYou. like many others, thrive on criticizing others instead of creative thoughts of your own. Prove me wrong.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:13 pm(dim bulb) we aren't in the market for a slugger. Which you would know if you had two brain cells to rub together.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:07 pmNimrod, I'm putting suggestions to obtain a much needed slugger, What's your suggestion that "makes sense"? It's doubtful that you'll come up with anything. You. like many others, thrive on criticism.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 19:01 pmStop asking dumb questions. First Harper is past being a superstar slugger. Second his contract isn't. Third STL isn't looking to add one massive contract player. But I don't expect anything from you that makes sense, More trolling.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:36 pmSo, please lay out, specically, how you would obtain a superstar slugger like a Harper for the next few seasons? It's pretty easy to criticize others. What's your plan to get that needed slugger?HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 18:30 pmYou get bashed for making silly suggestions. Harper is 32 and his performance is sliding down. Why would Chaim trade a upcoming player with superstar potential for one on the way down. Harper's best days are behind him but you want to pay him $150+ mill over the next 6 years. Does that really make sense to you? If so, you need to go smoke something different.Shady wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 10:23 amIt's just exploring a possible way to get a much needed superstar slugger. I'd be happy to entertain any other suggestions. But they are few and far between. Many posters would rather just try to bash others that try to be creative.HorseTrader wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 08:26 amWas this supposed to be a serious question or just a joke? Either way, it's just stupid
Note no one is backing this inane idea? Yeah, it's you.