STLtoday.com

Melville wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 13:20 pm

Voldemort wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 13:07 pm

Melville wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 12:41 pm

Bushiro wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 12:30 pm

Voldemort wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 08:52 am

Goldfan wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 08:49 am

Voldemort wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 08:45 am

Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026 03:04 am

Goldfan wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026 09:20 am I’ve watched many vids from ST
He looks off balanced
Not fluid
Awkward
Rear leg collapsing
A comment I saw on X summarizes it well.
He looks like an athlete from another sport attempting to take BP
He’s cooked.

I’ve only seen 2 videos. Where are you getting many videos? I want to see more. Can’t find them.

Exactly! Two videos are not enough to truly judge what is happening in his swing, though I really like what I see in these two videos. Also, it will be helpful to him and the coaching staff to see his game swings. It is so easy for a hitter to revert to what they did before making changes.

The vid I posted has several swings. And if you think the Judge setup and swing are similar to Walkers…..I don’t know what to say

I didn't say that Judge's swings were similar to Walker's swings. I said that his swings are a vast improvement over his swing from last year. I explained why I thought so. How about you break down the difference between Judge's swing and Walker's swing for all of us?

Very similar swings....Melville is right though...Walker opens up to much...he doesn't have the eye and pitch recognition judge has...so when he tries to pull everything for power...and not having eye means he's toast on anything outside....he has to stay closed more...they should have left him alone the first time

Absolutely correct on every detail.
Excellent post.

That a boy! Move that goal post. You said that he needed a closed stance. Myself and others have been mentioning that his stance is better this year with a part of that being that he was not so open. Now, you move that goal post to give the impression that you meant that he needed to be closer to square. ROFLMAO! You are not doing well in your character today.

I find childish and disingenuous posters such as you rather tedious.
But being kind and gracious to a fault, I never respond in kind and stick solely to facts.
My original post said this: "He needs to close his stance."
I have explained with clarity and perfection why it would be necessary and productive.
Regrettably, you have chosen to misrepresent what I have stated - whether through lack of comprehension or outright dishonesty I will not attempt to judge.
Not important to me.
Your last two posts have finally admitted my point all along.
I am glad you have arrived at the point to which I have led you.
It would have been a shorter journey on your part had your initial engagement been less motivated by your personal agenda and more concerned with
actual productive dialogue.
Regardless, I am glad you recognize the accurate point I made, since education is my only concern.
My advice?
Keep reading.
Keep learning.
(And less dishonesty on your part - which of course, is a decision only you can make.)