Bomber1 wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025 08:47 am
Just my 2 cents - it would be idiotic to eat a large chunk of Arenado’s salary to get rid of him, only to give the 3B job to Gorman.
I hope there is a better plan than that.
The primary motive should be moving Arenado.
Who he’s replaced with in the near term shouldn’t be something to worry about.
I hope they trade him even if it means eating half of his salary.
Personally I would trade Donovan, Nootbaar, and Gorman.
That gives LF to Herrera, RF to Burleson, 3B to Arenado for 2 years, and 2B to Wetherholt.
And I don’t see any good reason to keep Gorman around. He has been nothing short of terrible and it’s no longer a small sample size.
Just what exactly does eating a large chunk of money and moving Arenado accomplish?
A .700 OPS Arenado at least helps due to defense.
A .720 OPS Gorman doesn’t help the team in any way.
"3B to Arenado for 2 years" why???
Because he’s the best 3B they have?
Because they owe him $ 42 million?
Because they should trade Donovan who will bring something back, unlike Arenado?
Because Gorman is horrid?