Re: Moe on why he held on to position players - per K. Woo
Posted: 01 Aug 2025 12:42 pm
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1515147
You'd (bleep) him if he did, you'd (bleep) him if he didn't.Jobu's Rum wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 18:57 pm John Mozeliak on why he retained his position players, despite significant interest:
"We got hit a lot on our left-handed hitters ... but we were not motivated to move players that we had under control unless we were, to put it mildly, blown away. And we just weren't."
Expecting to be blown away for f'in Nootbaar!?!?!?!
Un f'in real this dude man
I believe they were hoping to move one of their LH bats if a reasonable deal emerged.NorthernBird wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 09:56 amThey still need to field a team... Who is Noot blocking? We have a thin OF corps and he's cost controlled.Jobu's Rum wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025 19:03 pm I can understand needing to be blown away for Donny, and Burly is a competent enough hitter to keep around, but f'in Nootbaar?!?!?!
What planet is this dude on
So why trade him "low" just for the sake of trading?