Adam Jiříček

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Army's Mom
Forum User
Posts: 453
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by Army's Mom »

BluesDom wrote: 11 Jun 2025 10:03 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 10 Jun 2025 22:41 pm
stlblue06 wrote: 10 Jun 2025 22:11 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jun 2025 15:06 pm If MN and kimzey - two posters with a long track record of prospect knowledge and levelheadedness - are concerned about him, then I definitely am. Hoping he is able to turn it around because it can really hurt to whiff on a #16. That pick is high enough that it would have been a VERY attractive trade piece.
Pull up the draft lists from 2010-2020. It’s shocking how many top 10 picks completely bust. Like not even a bottom 6 or bottom pair player. The 15-30 range is VERY hard to hit on and the Blues have done a VERY good job in that range.

It’s simply too early to tell with Jiříček. Huge season coming up for him though
Any pick can bust, even a TOP5. It's even accurate to say that TOP5 busts happen almost every draft year.

The key question is when do you know that your GM made a mistake?

In the case of a TOP5 pick, it is quite easy to know. The player should be remarkable immediately. If not, it's a bust.

In the case of a #17 pick, when do you know that the GM made a mistake? My thought is 2 years. If the player remains only "NHL potential" after 2 years, I would say that the pick is a bust.

This is exactly why Armstrong loves late picks. There are NO EXPECTATIONS and NO PROGRESS REPORTS. If Armstrong fails, the fans won't even notice. Further, the only bar that the prospect has to clear is that "he made it on the Blues roster". Since he is a later pick, there are no expectations that the player make a real impact, ever.
"In the case of a #17 pick, when do you know that the GM made a mistake? My thought is 2 years. If the player remains only "NHL potential" after 2 years, I would say that the pick is a bust." My question is--why is your thought worth anything to other posters? Look at our prospect pool--the majority are not nhl ready in 2 years. What a stupid opinion. Wrong and makes no sense. You aren't getting your answer on Jiricek. Just be quiet and watch. You will be wrong again. You're just a fan and your opinions make no impact. (Maybe not a fan--maybe just a know it all - critic.) This is a huge year for Jiricek.
Here's the thing:

If Jiricek busts, we won't know it for another three or four years. And Smelly will claim he was right all along.

But he isn't. He's just guessing, based upon his agenda and the current odds. Jiricek could still pan out despite the long odds - that's why they play the games.

One pick doesn't mean Army is bad at the draft, or favors picking late because he can't stand the pressure of expectations.

As for the 2 years timeframe:
Joachim Kemmel, 17th pick in 2022, has yet to make the NHL,
Zachary Bolduc, 17th pick in 2021, took three years to become a regular (24-25), as a forward - a position with a shorter development curve,
Lukas Reichel, 17th pick in 2020, took three years to become a regular (23-24), also a forward,
Peyton Krebs, 17th in 2019, took two years to become a regular, also a forward,
Ty Smith, 17th in 2018, spent the 23-24 and 24-25 seasons as a tweener, and is a defenseman.
Timothy Liljegren, 17th in 2017, has been a regular since 2021-2022, and is a defenseman. So a five-year horizon.

For a defenseman picked 17th overall, I'd wait about five years to pass judgement. But Smelly will be on his third of fourth different username by then, so we won't be able to tell him if he's wrong :D
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 1771
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by STL fan in MN »

Why are we even talking about 17th overall picks? Jiricek was drafted 16th.
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1369
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by Harry S Deals »

stlblue06 wrote: 10 Jun 2025 22:11 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jun 2025 15:06 pm If MN and kimzey - two posters with a long track record of prospect knowledge and levelheadedness - are concerned about him, then I definitely am. Hoping he is able to turn it around because it can really hurt to whiff on a #16. That pick is high enough that it would have been a VERY attractive trade piece.
Pull up the draft lists from 2010-2020. It’s shocking how many top 10 picks completely bust. Like not even a bottom 6 or bottom pair player. The 15-30 range is VERY hard to hit on and the Blues have done a VERY good job in that range.

It’s simply too early to tell with Jiříček. Huge season coming up for him though
I did the math from 2015-2022 only about 53% of players chosen in the top 5 of the NHL draft actually ended producing in the Top 5 of their respective draft class. Obviously some asterisks, if they were defenseman for instance they probably wouldnt produce as much as top forwards but you get the idea.
somni
Forum User
Posts: 2435
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by somni »

If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 1367
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by MiamiLaw »

Harry S Deals wrote: 11 Jun 2025 10:45 am
stlblue06 wrote: 10 Jun 2025 22:11 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jun 2025 15:06 pm If MN and kimzey - two posters with a long track record of prospect knowledge and levelheadedness - are concerned about him, then I definitely am. Hoping he is able to turn it around because it can really hurt to whiff on a #16. That pick is high enough that it would have been a VERY attractive trade piece.
Pull up the draft lists from 2010-2020. It’s shocking how many top 10 picks completely bust. Like not even a bottom 6 or bottom pair player. The 15-30 range is VERY hard to hit on and the Blues have done a VERY good job in that range.

It’s simply too early to tell with Jiříček. Huge season coming up for him though
I did the math from 2015-2022 only about 53% of players chosen in the top 5 of the NHL draft actually ended producing in the Top 5 of their respective draft class. Obviously some asterisks, if they were defenseman for instance they probably wouldnt produce as much as top forwards but you get the idea.
I guarantee that that is by far the highest number as far as players that are in the Top 5. Not that it should be surprising but you need context for the 53% (which I am taking your word on and not double-checking).

The stats are very clear that the chances of NHL impact falls off dramatically after the top 10 or so and even more after the 1st round where it is basically an exponential plummet. stlblue06 is right about that. Overall, the Blues have done pretty good considering their draft position but they took a gamble on Jiricek and the early returns seem to be pretty concerning.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 903
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by a smell of green grass »

somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
somni
Forum User
Posts: 2435
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by somni »

a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
Define "destined to lead you to win a Cup".
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1369
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by Harry S Deals »

somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:36 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
Define "destined to lead you to win a Cup".
Another idiotic post from this stooge. Not sure why EVERYONE doesnt have this clown on ignore but .... Kessel was a 5th round pick WTH does he have to do with anything but he may indeed still pan out to be a serviceable RHD
stlblues1979
Forum User
Posts: 655
Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by stlblues1979 »

somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:36 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
Define "destined to lead you to win a Cup".
Well, I've truly been enlightened this morning. Perunovich = Dvorsky. :roll: :roll: :lol:

And if a player doesn't lead you to a cup, he's a bust? :roll:
somni
Forum User
Posts: 2435
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by somni »

stlblues1979 wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:48 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:36 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
Define "destined to lead you to win a Cup".
Well, I've truly been enlightened this morning. Perunovich = Dvorsky. :roll: :roll: :lol:

And if a player doesn't lead you to a cup, he's a bust? :roll:
So today I've learned that Jerome Iginla, Henrik Lundqvist, and even Pavel Bure, were all busts. That's lots to take in here in the morning in the west coast. 8O
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1369
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by Harry S Deals »

I've had more meaningful NHL player conversations with my neighbors Boxer dog
BudOnTap
Forum User
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:46 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by BudOnTap »

a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
you really told stupidity to hold your beer with this one.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 445
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by 2forDiving »

BudOnTap wrote: 11 Jun 2025 12:58 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
you really told stupidity to hold your beer with this one.
And what’s simply amazing is within the next 24 hours he will out do this latest post. It’s an incredible feat. Just when you think he reached the summit of stupidity, he finds a higher peak :lol:
Army's Mom
Forum User
Posts: 453
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by Army's Mom »

a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup.
Connor McDavid, Leon Draisatl, Kaprizov, are all busts. Who knew...?

Smelly has spoken.
somni
Forum User
Posts: 2435
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by somni »

Army's Mom wrote: 11 Jun 2025 14:07 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup.
Connor McDavid, Leon Draisatl, Kaprizov, are all busts. Who knew...?

Smelly has spoken.
Do you know who was destined to lead a team to a Cup? Ryan O'Reilly. Drafted #33 overall.

Do you know who wasn't destined? Matt Duchene. Drafted #3 overall.
stlblues1979
Forum User
Posts: 655
Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm

Re: Adam Jiříček

Post by stlblues1979 »

2forDiving wrote: 11 Jun 2025 13:24 pm
BudOnTap wrote: 11 Jun 2025 12:58 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:34 am
somni wrote: 11 Jun 2025 11:12 am If Adam Jiricek is a bust, it would be the first bust since Dominik Bokk (assuming the 2023 crew continue their development). Not sure how other teams' first rounders stack up, but that seems pretty good.

2023
Dalibor Dvorsky - 1st Round, No. 10
Otto Stenberg - 1st Round, No. 25
Theo Lindstein - 1st Round, No. 29

2022
Jimmy Snuggerud - 1st Round, No. 23

2021
Zack Bolduc - 1st Round, No. 17

2020
Jake Neighbours - 1st Round, No. 26

2018
Dominik Bokk - 1st round, No. 25

2017
Robert Thomas - 1st round, No. 29
Klim Kostin - 1st round, No. 30

2016
Tage Thompson - 1st round, No. 26
IMO a bust is a player that is not destined to lead you to win a Cup. Everyone of Armys high draft picks will see NHL ice. Just accomplishing that means nothing. Perunivich = Dvorsky = Kessel at the current time. Ring my bell when we can clearly see a drafted player being legit on a Cup roster. Im not interested in potential. I want to see results.

If a player is too young for NHL, he is also to young to forecast greatness.

And the key question remains…. How do we evaluate Army drafts? Perunivich was not cast as an Army fail. It was a Perunivich fail. The same goes for every prospect currently. Most will likely fail, and when they do, it will notbe Armys fault. Army is never evaluated.
you really told stupidity to hold your beer with this one.
And what’s simply amazing is within the next 24 hours he will out do this latest post. It’s an incredible feat. Just when you think he reached the summit of stupidity, he finds a higher peak :lol:
I know! Poor guy really is amazing. He reaches new peaks of stupidity while digging his hole deeper & deeper. That's quite a feat.
He really does need to drop the shovel though! :lol:
Post Reply