Cards sign Phil Maton
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: 24 May 2018 20:27 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
It doesn’t suggest that at all. That may happen but this signing doesn’t suggest that. It suggests that the Cardinals weren’t happy with the late innings bullpen. They signed Nick Martinez thinking he might claim that role but he’s been shaky at best. Trading a Fedde or Matz just opens up a spot for McGreevy.
The only bullpen arm worth much is Helsley and since he hasn’t already been moved, I don’t see him being moved until close to the trade deadline, if at all. All of the bullpen roles are the same as last year and now Maton just takes the spot that Kittredge had.
The plan was to move more salary but Gray and Contreras declined to be moved. Arenado nixed his trade to the Astros and now there just isn’t much of a market. What market is there for Mikolas. Maybe there’s a small market for Matz but not a huge one. The only real question is Helsley. I don’t know why he hasn’t been moved unless the Cardinals haven’t been offered enough or maybe there’s Cardinals really plan on keeping him. Helsley is the one question mark.
The only bullpen arm worth much is Helsley and since he hasn’t already been moved, I don’t see him being moved until close to the trade deadline, if at all. All of the bullpen roles are the same as last year and now Maton just takes the spot that Kittredge had.
The plan was to move more salary but Gray and Contreras declined to be moved. Arenado nixed his trade to the Astros and now there just isn’t much of a market. What market is there for Mikolas. Maybe there’s a small market for Matz but not a huge one. The only real question is Helsley. I don’t know why he hasn’t been moved unless the Cardinals haven’t been offered enough or maybe there’s Cardinals really plan on keeping him. Helsley is the one question mark.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Maton was pitching poorly at the time and the Rays traded him as a $6.25M salary dump since they were below .500. It is how the Rays operate.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 09:23 amOR... you could see what ACTUAL Phil Maton was worth in a trade in 2024, which was cash considerations or a player to be named later.VegasVinny wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 09:07 amNot necessarily. Luis Garcia fetched LAA four prospects from the Red Sox system, and Maton and Garcia are on pretty even footing from a production standpoint. The Orioles sent Philly their No. 8 prospect (Seth Johnson) along with a high-ceiling prospect (Moises Chace) for half a season of Gregory Soto, who profiles worse than Maton. Those are just a couple of 2024 deadline returns on relievers.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 08:48 am Pointless.
Maton isn't going to make this team a WS contender.
He isn't going to speed up the "refresh/reload" or whatever they call their payroll purge.
And he isn't going to bring back anything significant if traded mid season.
I can't find anything that says the Rays got a player in return for him.
Why would you be expecting them to receive a return? Relievers currently pitching poorly at the time they are traded usually don't bring a return.
Obviously he will only have value if he pitches well in the first half of 2025. He's making only $2M for STL.
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
A good possibility.wkycards wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 18:29 pmIt's got to be O'Brien. He hasn't pitched in a game since Feb 27 vs Yanks. He has 2ip all spring.Melville wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 18:15 pmI likewise considered the 2nd scenario - and would not be one bit surprised if you are very quickly proven correct.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 14:33 pmHad similar inclinations… either a trade or someone is hurt and they haven’t divulged it yet.
Still, I lean toward a trade being probable.
I think a starting pitcher (Matz, Mikolas, Fedde) will be moved, thereby opening a spot for McGreevy in the rotation - which in turn eliminates his arm from the BP (and sends Graceffo to Memphis - thereby creating demand for a true reliever like Maton.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
SP Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante, McGreevy
RRP Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Leahy, Roycroft
LRP Romero, King, Liberatore
They could trade Fedde or Matz or send Pallante down to AAA or just wait for an injury to make room for McGreevy.
What other deserving pitchers would Maton be blocking (even before injuries)?
RRP Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Leahy, Roycroft
LRP Romero, King, Liberatore
They could trade Fedde or Matz or send Pallante down to AAA or just wait for an injury to make room for McGreevy.
What other deserving pitchers would Maton be blocking (even before injuries)?
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Good wording statman. "deserving".cardstatman wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 19:21 pm SP Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante,McGreevy
RRP Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Leahy, Roycroft
LRP Romero, King, Liberatore
They could trade Fedde or Matz or send Pallante down to AAA or just wait for an injury to make room for McGreevy.
What other deserving pitchers would Maton be blocking (even before injuries)?
Maton is not blocking anyone.
They gave Anderson, Munoz, Graceffo enough time to see what they had to offer; then got Maton.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 25 May 2024 22:07 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Love the Maton signing. Our pitching should be good, again, like last year. And, if Arenado and Contreras both perform to career norms, our offense will be better than last year, as last year only Contreras performed at that level. So, realistically speaking, we should be a better offensive team this year. Especially, if anyone else at all on the team improves offensively, which really should happen. I'm more excited than most for this season, for that reason. We may not outslug many teams, but, if our offense improves just a bit, we could be a very well rounded team pitching, hitting and defense wise. We're due some good luck. Go Cards!
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
It is interesting that Anderson hasn't had much of a look. I wonder if he's fully healthy. He rarely is healthy but he's good. Not an innings eater.wkycards wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 19:27 pmGood wording statman. "deserving".cardstatman wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 19:21 pm SP Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante,McGreevy
RRP Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Leahy, Roycroft
LRP Romero, King, Liberatore
They could trade Fedde or Matz or send Pallante down to AAA or just wait for an injury to make room for McGreevy.
What other deserving pitchers would Maton be blocking (even before injuries)?
Maton is not blocking anyone.
They gave Anderson, Munoz, Graceffo enough time to see what they had to offer; then got Maton.
O'Brien has not been seen for a long time either. So the depth was fading already and Goold said they were looking for a reliever.
So they turned to Maton who was no doubt desperate to sign somewhere and probably finally dropped his price tag.
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Yeah, I think Anderson and O'Brien are dealing with something.cardstatman wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 21:34 pmIt is interesting that Anderson hasn't had much of a look. I wonder if he's fully healthy. He rarely is healthy but he's good. Not an innings eater.wkycards wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 19:27 pmGood wording statman. "deserving".cardstatman wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 19:21 pm SP Gray, Fedde, Mikolas, Matz, Pallante,McGreevy
RRP Helsley, Maton, Fernandez, Leahy, Roycroft
LRP Romero, King, Liberatore
They could trade Fedde or Matz or send Pallante down to AAA or just wait for an injury to make room for McGreevy.
What other deserving pitchers would Maton be blocking (even before injuries)?
Maton is not blocking anyone.
They gave Anderson, Munoz, Graceffo enough time to see what they had to offer; then got Maton.
O'Brien has not been seen for a long time either. So the depth was fading already and Goold said they were looking for a reliever.
So they turned to Maton who was no doubt desperate to sign somewhere and probably finally dropped his price tag.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 251
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
I believe it was the Talking About Birds podcast. They had Nick Pollack from PitcherList.com to talk Cards pitching. Very data driven and was a great listen. They discuss Pallante starting about the 6:00 min mark.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 14:01 pmAgree 100%. I think he and McGreevy should be in the rotation, Matz in the bullpen...mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:07 pmIf they retain any notion that Liberatore could still be a SP at the ML level, they should plan for him getting 20+ starts this year.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:04 pmHeard an interesting thing on a podcast when I was on the road this morning… that scouts and data are suggesting the Cardinals should have Liberatore in the rotation and that Pallante hasn’t looked good at all… with bad statcast data.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 12:30 pm^^This^^mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 11:37 am A positive if it means they don't stick McGreevy or Graceffo in the ML bullpen and let them continue developing as SPs at Memphis (given they are not in the STL rotation).
But McG deserves a spot in the OD rotation, unfortunately the idiot Mo will send him to Memphis while Mikolas & Matz remain in the SR.
This was the first that I'd heard any noise about Pallante, and it isn't coming from Cardinals camp. But apparently, velocity has pulled back a couple of ticks and the movement profile is not what it was last year... could be just spring stuff, but it is typically not a good sign when the drops are meaningful. The commentary was that Liberatore could be in the conversation to take Pallante's spot. They also said Liberatore's velo and movement profile were improved.
I don't believe that the Cardinals will do that, just sharing what I heard.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s8OJ8EvGPvg
Again, all of it was very informative.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12431
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Ah, definitely Nick Pollack! It wasn't this podcast but I'll give it a listen once I get through my fantasy drafts and I have more time.Sweet Jones wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 21:39 pmI believe it was the Talking About Birds podcast. They had Nick Pollack from PitcherList.com to talk Cards pitching. Very data driven and was a great listen. They discuss Pallante starting about the 6:00 min mark.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 14:01 pmAgree 100%. I think he and McGreevy should be in the rotation, Matz in the bullpen...mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:07 pmIf they retain any notion that Liberatore could still be a SP at the ML level, they should plan for him getting 20+ starts this year.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:04 pmHeard an interesting thing on a podcast when I was on the road this morning… that scouts and data are suggesting the Cardinals should have Liberatore in the rotation and that Pallante hasn’t looked good at all… with bad statcast data.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 12:30 pm^^This^^mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 11:37 am A positive if it means they don't stick McGreevy or Graceffo in the ML bullpen and let them continue developing as SPs at Memphis (given they are not in the STL rotation).
But McG deserves a spot in the OD rotation, unfortunately the idiot Mo will send him to Memphis while Mikolas & Matz remain in the SR.
This was the first that I'd heard any noise about Pallante, and it isn't coming from Cardinals camp. But apparently, velocity has pulled back a couple of ticks and the movement profile is not what it was last year... could be just spring stuff, but it is typically not a good sign when the drops are meaningful. The commentary was that Liberatore could be in the conversation to take Pallante's spot. They also said Liberatore's velo and movement profile were improved.
I don't believe that the Cardinals will do that, just sharing what I heard.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s8OJ8EvGPvg
Again, all of it was very informative.
Pollack was a guest on a fantasy podcast I listened to and he talked about this Pallante stuff. They're warning flags, for sure.
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
I would love Libby to UNLEASH in 2025.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 14:01 pmAgree 100%. I think he and McGreevy should be in the rotation, Matz in the bullpen...mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:07 pmIf they retain any notion that Liberatore could still be a SP at the ML level, they should plan for him getting 20+ starts this year.An Old Friend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 13:04 pmHeard an interesting thing on a podcast when I was on the road this morning… that scouts and data are suggesting the Cardinals should have Liberatore in the rotation and that Pallante hasn’t looked good at all… with bad statcast data.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 12:30 pm^^This^^mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 11:37 am A positive if it means they don't stick McGreevy or Graceffo in the ML bullpen and let them continue developing as SPs at Memphis (given they are not in the STL rotation).
But McG deserves a spot in the OD rotation, unfortunately the idiot Mo will send him to Memphis while Mikolas & Matz remain in the SR.
This was the first that I'd heard any noise about Pallante, and it isn't coming from Cardinals camp. But apparently, velocity has pulled back a couple of ticks and the movement profile is not what it was last year... could be just spring stuff, but it is typically not a good sign when the drops are meaningful. The commentary was that Liberatore could be in the conversation to take Pallante's spot. They also said Liberatore's velo and movement profile were improved.
I don't believe that the Cardinals will do that, just sharing what I heard.
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Rookies cant eat all the inning, you dont want to expose some guys whonarent mlb ready. He provides good quality innjngs and he is tradable at the deadline. Not a huge return but there will be a return. He also can be packaged with helsley or arenado to improve a return.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 08:48 am Pointless.
Maton isn't going to make this team a WS contender.
He isn't going to speed up the "refresh/reload" or whatever they call their payroll purge.
And he isn't going to bring back anything significant if traded mid season.
Im not saying this is amazing but theres nothing to be upset about with this signing.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 361
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
I wouldn't pay to much attention to Marmol. He's just spouting lines fed to him by Mozelack.Wattage wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 08:10 amRookies cant eat all the inning, you dont want to expose some guys whonarent mlb ready. He provides good quality innjngs and he is tradable at the deadline. Not a huge return but there will be a return. He also can be packaged with helsley or arenado to improve a return.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 08:48 am Pointless.
Maton isn't going to make this team a WS contender.
He isn't going to speed up the "refresh/reload" or whatever they call their payroll purge.
And he isn't going to bring back anything significant if traded mid season.
Im not saying this is amazing but theres nothing to be upset about with this signing.
As for as eating innings. If you're worried about hurting rookie arms, you could pick up players off wavers to eat those innings. (They'd happily be used to pick up major-league pay checks.)
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Eating innings requires getting outs, sparky.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 15:21 pmI wouldn't pay to much attention to Marmol. He's just spouting lines fed to him by Mozelack.Wattage wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 08:10 amRookies cant eat all the inning, you dont want to expose some guys whonarent mlb ready. He provides good quality innjngs and he is tradable at the deadline. Not a huge return but there will be a return. He also can be packaged with helsley or arenado to improve a return.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 08:48 am Pointless.
Maton isn't going to make this team a WS contender.
He isn't going to speed up the "refresh/reload" or whatever they call their payroll purge.
And he isn't going to bring back anything significant if traded mid season.
Im not saying this is amazing but theres nothing to be upset about with this signing.
As for as eating innings. If you're worried about hurting rookie arms, you could pick up players off wavers to eat those innings. (They'd happily be used to pick up major-league pay checks.)
Also, let's quit acting like we gave Maton 12mil....
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 361
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Cards sign Phil Maton
Anybody can get outs. We've seen catchers, outfielders, and utility guys get outs. Just a matter of how ugly you're willing to let things get.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 16:01 pmEating innings requires getting outs, sparky.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 15:21 pmI wouldn't pay to much attention to Marmol. He's just spouting lines fed to him by Mozelack.Wattage wrote: ↑14 Mar 2025 08:10 amRookies cant eat all the inning, you dont want to expose some guys whonarent mlb ready. He provides good quality innjngs and he is tradable at the deadline. Not a huge return but there will be a return. He also can be packaged with helsley or arenado to improve a return.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑13 Mar 2025 08:48 am Pointless.
Maton isn't going to make this team a WS contender.
He isn't going to speed up the "refresh/reload" or whatever they call their payroll purge.
And he isn't going to bring back anything significant if traded mid season.
Im not saying this is amazing but theres nothing to be upset about with this signing.
As for as eating innings. If you're worried about hurting rookie arms, you could pick up players off wavers to eat those innings. (They'd happily be used to pick up major-league pay checks.)
Also, let's quit acting like we gave Maton 12mil....
Two-million is more than 3 times what some waver-wire pitchers would cost, and Maton is worth maybe half a win, so the season will turn out about the same with or without him.
For a team that's trying to cut payroll, a team that has no chance of winning the WS, a team that isn't likely to be in the playoff hunt after June, it just doesn't make good sense.