Sure, those are rare but BDW bringing in other mini Billionaires OR selling to a group of Billionaires would be a better long term outcome for the team, STL, and fans.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 09:03 amAs I noted back on page 1, if people are holding out hope expecting the Cardinals to find their "Steve Cohen," I think there are going to be disappointed and waiting a long time.Goldfan wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 08:59 amIf a Guggenheim like group OR a mega Billionaire like Cohn were owners of the Cards we would not be worrying about payroll. Perhaps the evolution of pro sports ownership has gotten to the point where an owner like Dewitt(who has most of family wealth in the team value) is past. Deeper pockets are required to compete.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 08:26 amYes, if they operated around zero.Goldfan wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 08:19 amI listed the years back to ‘16, looks like the numbers align better if dropped down 1yr but take out the Covid anomaly and then fans staying home the last couple seasons and it shows a rather consistent income stream. Getting back to the high level point is that having multi billionaire large ownership groups lessens the need to throw off annual income. Those big dog Billionaires or multiple billionaires in those groups didn’t get involved to receive annual income. Either they are invested to WIN or long term Cap Appreciation. If BDW operated around 0….at least one maybe two elite players could be in uniform.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 08:11 amOK, yes that's what the numbers show.Goldfan wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 07:46 amMy point was that the Dodgers, Mets, Yanks double revenue and still have a lower operating profit than BDW. You can dispute the actual numbers….the comparison was against these other teams. Including the last couple years when BDW shot himself in the foot with attendance and TV eyeballs and including covid years obviously brings the avg down……but stil advances the POINT that while the large markets have a large $$$ advantage their ownership groups are putting most of that back into the team. How is it that BDW has 57mil and Dodgers ownership is in the 20’smilCardinals1964 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 02:15 amHow do you know the profit margin? I don’t think that’s public info.Goldfan wrote: ↑01 Jan 2026 17:57 pmBDW and crew have been keeping a larger $$ amount year over year than Dodgers, Mets, and other LARGE markets. This from a much lower revenue base. If you have ownership that can operate at close to 0 each season then the constant payroll worries and fears are nullifiedmattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jan 2026 09:35 amThe team may, or may not, be sold any time soon.Goldfan wrote: ↑01 Jan 2026 08:12 am I’ve said this several times before.
If BDW is no longer in a position to own a competitive MLB team then he needs to sell to deeper pockets who can compete in this environment
Ownership of this franchise has changed hands multiple times in its history. It is the norm. But for some reason some fans have been brainwashed that no one would want or could afford this historic Franchise. Clueless thought.
But most MLB owners - of any team - will operate to make some amount of annual profit. That boundary condition will probably determine what any ownership group will be willing to spend on an annual basis rather than their "want to" compete.
Edit. Never mind. I saw your Forbes report. Now, I want to know where Forbes got their information since revenue isn’t public knowledge.
But the Dodgers, Yankees, Mets, etc. are not the only points of comparison, and probably not the most relevant points of comparison.
More relevant, IMO, is either the ML average/median or specifically the other mid-market teams most like the Cardinals.
I, however, don't think operating around zero is necessarily a reasonable expectation, in particular when the Cardinals also have minority owners and there may be some obligations to operate more in the black so that they see some income/profits.
OT: Arby's closes more locations
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
Be careful what you wish for.
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
Ellisville, Bridgeton, and St. Peter's.
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
Deweys Pizza is operated by a DeWitt sonmytake wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 09:40 amEllisville, Bridgeton, and St. Peter's.
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
To begin with, operating profit is not the same as "EBITDA". Operating profit is after Depreciation and Amortization, and before interest and taxes. Better known as "EBIT". The figures I saw, show the Cardinals with a valuation of $2.55 million and debt as 8% of valuation. Out of the operating profit, you need to take interest expense on the debt as well as any taxes. And then for cash flow purposes, factor in any annual principal reduction required by the bank(s). Since we don't know the interest rate and any principal reductions required, we have no idea how much of the OP is consumed by debt service each year.
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
I saw 7% which is either in line or LOWER than most clubs. We’re comparing oranges to oranges hereCranny wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 10:49 am To begin with, operating profit is not the same as "EBITDA". Operating profit is after Depreciation and Amortization, and before interest and taxes. Better known as "EBIT". The figures I saw, show the Cardinals with a valuation of $2.55 million and debt as 8% of valuation. Out of the operating profit, you need to take interest expense on the debt as well as any taxes. And then for cash flow purposes, factor in any annual principal reduction required by the bank(s). Since we don't know the interest rate and any principal reductions required, we have no idea how much of the OP is consumed by debt service each year.
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13721
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
$2.55 billionCranny wrote: ↑02 Jan 2026 10:49 am To begin with, operating profit is not the same as "EBITDA". Operating profit is after Depreciation and Amortization, and before interest and taxes. Better known as "EBIT". The figures I saw, show the Cardinals with a valuation of $2.55 million and debt as 8% of valuation. Out of the operating profit, you need to take interest expense on the debt as well as any taxes. And then for cash flow purposes, factor in any annual principal reduction required by the bank(s). Since we don't know the interest rate and any principal reductions required, we have no idea how much of the OP is consumed by debt service each year.
Debt-to-Value is 7% (MLB league average is 10%), not 8% according to CNBC analyses of Forbes data.
Compared to their NLC rivals the Cardinals are in great financial shape:
Brewers/15%
Red & Pirates/10-11%
Scrubs/9-10%
Their EBITDA is estimated at $34M.
Going back to my banking days cranny I can tell you that's a financially healthy position the Cardinals find themselves in w/minimal leverage compared to their $2.55B valuation.
Crying poormouth is a joke.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14452
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: OT: Arby's closes more locations
Dam. I’m gonna miss that Beef and Cheddar.