He was pitching hurt. They talked about surgery, but ended up prescribing "rest". He did pitch better after some rest. Is that the end of the story? Buyer beware.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 22:05 pmBryce Miller was not good in 2025. Is there something that doesn't show up in his stats?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:58 pmWake me if it ever happens.
Talk is cheap
Can Bloom make it happen
MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
The team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 07:43 amHe was pitching hurt. They talked about surgery, but ended up prescribing "rest". He did pitch better after some rest. Is that the end of the story? Buyer beware.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 22:05 pmBryce Miller was not good in 2025. Is there something that doesn't show up in his stats?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:58 pmWake me if it ever happens.
Talk is cheap
Can Bloom make it happen
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13493
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
H E L L NO!smilinjoefission wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 17:54 pmWould you trade Woo for Donovan? 2024 Bryce Miller would be an ideal return for Donovan, and given his 2025 season it's doable. Plus 4 years of control. Yeah I want Woo, but I'd settle for Miller +.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 14:27 pm I'd shot higher than B. Miller...............it's Woo or nothing!![]()
I did float a sweetened offer though:
Donny
+
JoJo
+
Mathews or Hence
And I want NOTHING to do w/Miller, he put up an A. Pallante like 2025.
-
Ronnie Dobbs
- Forum User
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Have they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
-
George McFly
- Forum User
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 06 Nov 2024 11:56 am
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Someone earlier mentioned Jason Dominguez from the Yankees. If not one for one, adding something like Romero for example or others with Donovan might get the job done.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
I'm starting to consider a pretty even swap. Donovan and Romero for Dominguez and Lagrange. Maybe request another fairly high prospect from the Yankees included. They have quite a few pitching prospects that would work.George McFly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:54 am Someone earlier mentioned Jason Dominguez from the Yankees. If not one for one, adding something like Romero for example or others with Donovan might get the job done.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
The reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Donovan is one of the top available names on the market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 16:08 pmDefine “high level.” And Donovan has averaged 3 fWAR the past two seasons, and is projected to deliver 3 fWAR in 2026—he’s a very good, very useful player, but that is not “All Star caliber” production.
Please try to get it through your head: Donovan has a fairly well-defined range of value, and the Cardinals are not going to receive a dollar in exchange for 50 cents.
Fortunately, GM's disagree--strongly--with your .50 perspective.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1528
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
The “50 cents” reference was about relative value in a trade, not his absolute value. I could have said “the Cardinals are not going to receive two dollars in exchange for one dollar” or “$64mm for $32mm” and it would have meant the same thing.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 16:43 pmDonovan is one of the top available names on the market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 16:08 pmDefine “high level.” And Donovan has averaged 3 fWAR the past two seasons, and is projected to deliver 3 fWAR in 2026—he’s a very good, very useful player, but that is not “All Star caliber” production.
Please try to get it through your head: Donovan has a fairly well-defined range of value, and the Cardinals are not going to receive a dollar in exchange for 50 cents.
Fortunately, GM's disagree--strongly--with your .50 perspective.
And whatever characterization you choose to apply to his “name,” the fact remains Donovan was a 3 fWAR player two years ago, a 3 fWAR player last year, and is currently projected by FG to be a 3 fWAR player in 2026. No FO in MLB is confused about his reasonable valuation range. That said, the more teams bidding in the auction, the more likely the Cardinals are to get the higher end of the range; but no, they are not going to get “a dollar for 50 cents.”
Last edited by NYCardsFan on 15 Dec 2025 17:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
We will find out. See you then.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:04 pmThe “50 cents” reference was about relative value in a trade, not his absolute value. I could have said “the Cardinals are not going to receive two dollars in exchange for one dollar” or “$64mm for $32mm” and it would have meant the same thing.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 16:43 pmDonovan is one of the top available names on the market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 16:08 pmDefine “high level.” And Donovan has averaged 3 fWAR the past two seasons, and is projected to deliver 3 fWAR in 2026—he’s a very good, very useful player, but that is not “All Star caliber” production.
Please try to get it through your head: Donovan has a fairly well-defined range of value, and the Cardinals are not going to receive a dollar in exchange for 50 cents.
Fortunately, GM's disagree--strongly--with your .50 perspective.
And whatever label you choose to apply to his “name,” the fact remains Donovan was a 3 fWAR player two years ago, a 3 fWAR player last year, and is currently projected by FG to be a 3 fWAR player in 2026. No FO in MLB is confused about his reasonable valuation range. That said, the more teams bidding in the auction, the more likely the Cardinals are to get the higher end of the range; but no, they are not going to get “a dollar for 50 cents.”
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1528
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Since you claim that “GMs disagree—strongly—with [my] .50 perspective,” do you have any GMs in mind who are inclined to give the Cardinals 2x or 3x Donovan’s value? If so, please let Bloom know ASAP.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:08 pmWe will find out. See you then.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:04 pmThe “50 cents” reference was about relative value in a trade, not his absolute value. I could have said “the Cardinals are not going to receive two dollars in exchange for one dollar” or “$64mm for $32mm” and it would have meant the same thing.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 16:43 pmDonovan is one of the top available names on the market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 16:08 pmDefine “high level.” And Donovan has averaged 3 fWAR the past two seasons, and is projected to deliver 3 fWAR in 2026—he’s a very good, very useful player, but that is not “All Star caliber” production.
Please try to get it through your head: Donovan has a fairly well-defined range of value, and the Cardinals are not going to receive a dollar in exchange for 50 cents.
Fortunately, GM's disagree--strongly--with your .50 perspective.
And whatever label you choose to apply to his “name,” the fact remains Donovan was a 3 fWAR player two years ago, a 3 fWAR player last year, and is currently projected by FG to be a 3 fWAR player in 2026. No FO in MLB is confused about his reasonable valuation range. That said, the more teams bidding in the auction, the more likely the Cardinals are to get the higher end of the range; but no, they are not going to get “a dollar for 50 cents.”
-
TraveledLessRoad
- Forum User
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 10 Jul 2024 14:36 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
That's just not true. They aren't too cheap to sign him. They just sent $20mil to Boston in the Sonny trade. They're just aware that extending an above average utility player that was never considered a top-prospect, while entering his mid thirties, in the midst of a team re-build, is a dumb idea when they can maximize his return. It's called the "long-game."ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 11:53 amThe reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Donovan is 28 and is top 5 bat at 2B in MLB with a gold glove or were you talking about someone else?TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:20 pmThat's just not true. They aren't too cheap to sign him. They just sent $20mil to Boston in the Sonny trade. They're just aware that extending an above average utility player that was never considered a top-prospect, while entering his mid thirties, in the midst of a team re-build, is a dumb idea when they can maximize his return. It's called the "long-game."ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 11:53 amThe reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
-
TraveledLessRoad
- Forum User
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 10 Jul 2024 14:36 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
I apologize...I had his age incorrect. But, that's what we should be building around? a 28 year old second baseman with no power, a career .772 OPS and pretty bad splits? I'm sorry, but if this resembles a franchise cornerstone, we're absolutely effedScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:48 pmDonovan is 28 and is top 5 bat at 2B in MLB with a gold glove or were you talking about someone else?TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:20 pmThat's just not true. They aren't too cheap to sign him. They just sent $20mil to Boston in the Sonny trade. They're just aware that extending an above average utility player that was never considered a top-prospect, while entering his mid thirties, in the midst of a team re-build, is a dumb idea when they can maximize his return. It's called the "long-game."ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 11:53 amThe reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Why does he have to be someone to build around? He is a piece. A very good piece who we could rely on for years to come. The proposals I've seen thus far are underwhelming.TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 18:22 pmI apologize...I had his age incorrect. But, that's what we should be building around? a 28 year old second baseman with no power, a career .772 OPS and pretty bad splits? I'm sorry, but if this resembles a franchise cornerstone, we're absolutely effedScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:48 pmDonovan is 28 and is top 5 bat at 2B in MLB with a gold glove or were you talking about someone else?TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:20 pmThat's just not true. They aren't too cheap to sign him. They just sent $20mil to Boston in the Sonny trade. They're just aware that extending an above average utility player that was never considered a top-prospect, while entering his mid thirties, in the midst of a team re-build, is a dumb idea when they can maximize his return. It's called the "long-game."ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 11:53 amThe reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Solid take.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 19:17 pmWhy does he have to be someone to build around? He is a piece. A very good piece who we could rely on for years to come. The proposals I've seen thus far are underwhelming.TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 18:22 pmI apologize...I had his age incorrect. But, that's what we should be building around? a 28 year old second baseman with no power, a career .772 OPS and pretty bad splits? I'm sorry, but if this resembles a franchise cornerstone, we're absolutely effedScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:48 pmDonovan is 28 and is top 5 bat at 2B in MLB with a gold glove or were you talking about someone else?TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 17:20 pmThat's just not true. They aren't too cheap to sign him. They just sent $20mil to Boston in the Sonny trade. They're just aware that extending an above average utility player that was never considered a top-prospect, while entering his mid thirties, in the midst of a team re-build, is a dumb idea when they can maximize his return. It's called the "long-game."ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 11:53 amThe reason for trading him is he was pitching hurt. Donovan is on the block because the Cardinals are too cheap to pay him. His numbers were good and he is healthy.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:52 amHave they expressed willingness to trade him?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 08:21 amThe team expressed willingness to trade him. Not a good sign.
Would it matter either way, though? Is it a bad sign for Donovan that the Cardinals have been very open about trading him?
Nootbar? Yes. Arenado? Yes. Donovan? No.
Are we sure that he doesn't want to test FA in the years to come?