I never liked the trade. But I agree they should have traded high on Feddy. Something MO never does.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:00 pmIt's almost like new information came to light and folks changed their mind. Shocker.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.![]()
And while I'm glad to be done with him, it was still a good trade...at the time it was made. Tommy was getting expensive relative to his production, and hadn't set foot in a major league stadium at all last season.
I won't fault Mozo for making that trade. But I will absolutely fault him for running with failure for way too long.
Fedde DFAd
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
Even though it's not true, it's still funny.Jobu's Rum wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:05 pmRed Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.![]()
I remember when you were the main person that wanted Fedde
I never wanted Fedde. I'm still an Edman fan although his recent injuries have really limited his contributions.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
I agree with this.
Because much of his value comes from skills other than batting, people look at the batting line and discount Edman. But Tommy is a 20 WAR player who might reach 30+ WAR if he can stay healthy. That's a fine player and way more valuable than Fedde.
Re: Fedde DFAd
Why isn’t CT holding Dusty Blake accountable for all these terrible starts by ML experienced starters?
Re: Fedde DFAd
Miles is a SP who gets polar results.
He is also a guy that rubs some of us wrong, don't even
care to see a picture of the guy.
Of his 19 starts he has given up 2 runs or less 10 times. Another
3 games he has given up 3 runs. Not terrible for a bottom of the rotation guy
but definitely overpriced which depending on POV probably means more
to Bill than me.
Re: Fedde DFAd
If the club still had Edmond, world he be dfa’d?
Re: Fedde DFAd
I don't know if this is real or meant to be sarcastic, but I agree with it. Haven't seen Blake called out much on here and it is definitely a fair question to ask.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
Not making a ridiculous 70 million he wouldn’t
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
Dusty Blake sucks. But we're also tired of seeing scapegoats lose their jobs because John Mozeliak can't or won't build a competent rotation. The buck stops with him.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
Pham got cut because it was clear we were out of the race at that time and doing so would give him a chance to play for a competitor.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
The present value of that contract is actually closer to $60 million.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 14:19 pmNot making a ridiculous 70 million he wouldn’t
If healthy, Edman (Average 4 WAR per season) is worth that money.
Re: Fedde DFAd
But this was a wasted season from the start. They wanted to see what the young guys could do. The GM needs to sell guys ay their highest value which was this offseason for Fedde. Fedde wasn't really in their plans for the future. It doesn't really matter who takes his innings..McGreevy probably could be starting all year, Matz could take his place, or just sign a Gibson type off the scrap heap for nothing because we had no intention of putting a winning team out there. Just cut payroll and let the youngsters sink or swim. Now not only did we get nothing whatsoever for him now we are paying him to do nothing but scratch his balls.renostl wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 13:51 pmThat's most of the reality.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:26 pmNobody is saying that. He was an inexpensive risk. If he pitches close to what he had done, he's a steal. At worst, he is a limited risk. He flames out and you have only 3M left and no years left. Thats enough to toss a mid level team prospect and maybe a lottery ticket at.AnExParrot wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:16 pmYou see brock here knows more than the other 29 GMs/POBOs in MLB - those guys had no idea, not even an inkling that Fedde was what brock saw, so we would have got a straight up HAUL of prospects.
![]()
The Cards are extremely thin with SP. There's McGreevy, Matz, then a couple others and it's not like Libs, Pallante, or Miles
are some absolute knowns quantities. They have also been extremely fortunate to this point with health. Extremely.
Fedde, even with the hindsight POV, brought developmental time to the organization for those pitchers. He looks less valuable
now because he wasn't needed so much when no injuries occurred. He was probably going to be gone in a week anyway.
The miss with Fedde is whatever prospect he'd bring back a maybe something vs nothing.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Fedde DFAd
They could have gotten a quality prospect for a guy coming off a career year and only $7M committed to him. Many people, including me, were clamoring for them to trade both Fedde and Helsley. The Cardinals are now so bad at evaluating their own players, they can't even sell low. They just have to release guys now.Bomber1 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:58 amYes, you love to support this FO.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:52 amSo nothing.Bomber1 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:43 amNow nothing - 8 months ago a middling prospect.
You just love to support this FO.
Nope, I just ask what would they have gotten and who takes their place/innings. I think about more than just getting a rid of a player and how it affects the lineup, starting pitching , minors, etc...
You continually tell everyone how worthless most of the Cardinals players are and how poor Oli is stuck with a crummy roster.
One guy has been in charge of the roster for the past 18 years, yet you never seem to take him to task for that crummy roster.