STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1509051
would love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
I'm surprised Cam Cannarella is that low on the listDewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
he never got back to his freshman year. And the hit tool fell off this year.Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:42 pmI'm surprised Cam Cannarella is that low on the listDewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
Yep, I was surprised how low he's fallen, as well. Not having a great stretch, apparently. I wanted to pick him at 5 a couple months ago. I get the feeling this draft will be a bit volatile to the very end.Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:42 pmI'm surprised Cam Cannarella is that low on the listDewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
yeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
So we’d have a Curly and a Burly. Curly Fries sales would go through the roof.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
after a quick search i can't find a mock including multiple rounds. i can find several rounds of "prospect rankings" but no useful thought out mock draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:49 pmyeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
If you do come across a mock that includes the Day 1 draft (R1-R3), link it.
prospect rankings are awesome...excellent frame of reference as the draft goes along. And it makes an easy go to place for stats and Tool Grades.Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:10 pmafter a quick search i can't find a mock including multiple rounds. i can find several rounds of "prospect rankings" but no useful thought out mock draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:49 pmyeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prosp.ects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
If you do come across a mock that includes the Day 1 draft (R1-R3), link it.
It's such a wide open draft, i think they might have their eye on 20 players for the 5 pickcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:14 pmprospect rankings are awesome...excellent frame of reference as the draft goes along. And it makes an easy go to place for stats and Tool Grades.Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:10 pmafter a quick search i can't find a mock including multiple rounds. i can find several rounds of "prospect rankings" but no useful thought out mock draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:49 pmyeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prosp.ects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
If you do come across a mock that includes the Day 1 draft (R1-R3), link it.
------
I saw a mock like 40 days ago that mocked the first few rounds....it's on this thread....not sure which page, though
this should be a fun needle in the haystack hunt
I can't remember the website, either
craviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:14 pmHere is a top 43 mock...Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:10 pmafter a quick search i can't find a mock including multiple rounds. i can find several rounds of "prospect rankings" but no useful thought out mock draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:49 pmyeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prosp.ects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
If you do come across a mock that includes the Day 1 draft (R1-R3), link it.
https://www.flobaseball.tv/articles/142 ... es-round-1
prospect rankings are awesome...excellent frame of reference as the draft goes along. And it makes an easy go to place for stats and Tool Grades.
------
I saw a mock like 40 days ago that mocked the first few rounds....it's on this thread....not sure which page, though
this should be a fun needle in the haystack hunt
I can't remember the website, either
Lol, maybe have a Burly burger(it'll "hit" the spot, but, no defense from an upset stomachFuturegm2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:05 pmSo we’d have a Curly and a Burly. Curly Fries sales would go through the roof.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
) with the Curly fries!Here's the Mock that I was thinking about....FGM2 linked it on March 15th!!!!craviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:14 pmprospect rankings are awesome...excellent frame of reference as the draft goes along. And it makes an easy go to place for stats and Tool Grades.Adam2 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 13:10 pmafter a quick search i can't find a mock including multiple rounds. i can find several rounds of "prospect rankings" but no useful thought out mock draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:49 pmyeah....the ranking board.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:40 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prosp.ects/draftcraviduce wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:13 amwould love to see that mock. Reading/devouring mocks in the 2nd and 3rd round would be great.DewittDaman11 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 11:09 am I saw one draft recently, can't remember which one, that had the Cardinals getting Arquette at 5, and then getting Curly at 54. My how Curly has fallen in some folks mind. Still, if Curly was really still available at 54, I would have no problem with the pick. Not crazy about Arquette at 5, but, I would be ok with it.
It was actually the MLB.com draft prospects list. Listed as 5/6/25.
If you do come across a mock that includes the Day 1 draft (R1-R3), link it.
------
I saw a mock like 40 days ago that mocked the first few rounds....it's on this thread....not sure which page, though
this should be a fun needle in the haystack hunt
I can't remember the website, either