NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7662
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Shady »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:30 pm The Yankees are not high on him. No, they won't come out and say that. The way that you know is the reduction in playing time as the season went on, and their offseason approach. They had 2 OF enter free agency, and rather than let that organically provide an opening for their 23 year old wonder kid, they re-signed them to big contracts. They are telegraphing their evaluation of the player. We would do well to believe them.
Then, the Yankees should be open to trading him for a reasonable return.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 5433
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
moose-and-squirrel
Forum User
Posts: 6124
Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by moose-and-squirrel »

Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 2960
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7662
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Shady »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 2009
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Does he have options?
pitchingandefense
Forum User
Posts: 215
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 11:58 am

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by pitchingandefense »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:30 pm The Yankees are not high on him. No, they won't come out and say that. The way that you know is the reduction in playing time as the season went on, and their offseason approach. They had 2 OF enter free agency, and rather than let that organically provide an opening for their 23 year old wonder kid, they re-signed them to big contracts. They are telegraphing their evaluation of the player. We would do well to believe them.
The Yankees are in a position to contend in 2026, so they don’t want to see if JD can develop into something more. They paid for the more sure things. The Cardinals, however, are in position to see if they could develop him into a solid player.

Having said that, and being someone who thinks the Cards should go after him, there’s no way the Cards should give up prospects to get him. My proposal of Pages, Romero and Fitts was made because it fills needs for the Yankees and gives JD a chance to start in the majors.

There is no way I’m giving up Mathews for JD. Mathews, Doyle, and JC present the best chance at TOTR starter potential.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 5433
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:43 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
He is close. He has only been in the system 2 full years. Patience grasshopper.
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7662
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Shady »

Cardinals4Life wrote: 16 Feb 2026 00:03 am
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:43 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
He is close. He has only been in the system 2 full years. Patience grasshopper.
I hope you are correct. However, the fact that the Cardinals brought in three starting pitchers for their rotation makes me wonder how close they feel Mathews is to being a productive MLB starting pitcher.
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 15445
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

Shady wrote: 16 Feb 2026 08:08 am
Cardinals4Life wrote: 16 Feb 2026 00:03 am
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:43 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
He is close. He has only been in the system 2 full years. Patience grasshopper.
I hope you are correct. However, the fact that the Cardinals brought in three starting pitchers for their rotation makes me wonder how close they feel Mathews is to being a productive MLB starting pitcher.
The three brought in are no guarantees of starting. Second, with all the pitching they brought in, it’s a saturation of arms. Matthews may be a part of that group.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 5433
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Shady wrote: 16 Feb 2026 08:08 am
Cardinals4Life wrote: 16 Feb 2026 00:03 am
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:43 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
He is close. He has only been in the system 2 full years. Patience grasshopper.
I hope you are correct. However, the fact that the Cardinals brought in three starting pitchers for their rotation makes me wonder how close they feel Mathews is to being a productive MLB starting pitcher.
We are collecting pitching.
1.) We were very thin on MLB ready arms.
2.) You can never have enough pitching.
3.) Eventually you can use this depth as trade collateral
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7662
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: NY Post: Dominguez may not have a roster spot

Post by Shady »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 16 Feb 2026 08:24 am
Shady wrote: 16 Feb 2026 08:08 am
Cardinals4Life wrote: 16 Feb 2026 00:03 am
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:43 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:22 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:19 pm
Cardinals4Life wrote: 15 Feb 2026 16:12 pm
Shady wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:36 pm
moose-and-squirrel wrote: 15 Feb 2026 14:25 pm trade Matthews for a part time player... lol
Dominguez has been a more productive MLB player than Mathews has been. And Dominguez is only 23 and Mathews is 25.
Though I am not against acquiring Dominguez, comparing their MLB production os silly. Mathews is on the cusp of making his debut. He rose 4 minor league levels in 1 year before struggling (and I use rhat term loosely) a little at Memphis last year. Hopefully that struggle last year is enough for him to be even better this year. I would struggle really hard, having to give up Mathews.
if stl offered matthews, ny would do that fast before they changed their mind
For sure.
Isn't it about time for Mathews to be a productive MLB pitcher for the Cardinals? He is 25. He's not the the starting rotation picture at the present time. Actually, I would prefer Bloom offer Pallante and Crooks.
He is close. He has only been in the system 2 full years. Patience grasshopper.
I hope you are correct. However, the fact that the Cardinals brought in three starting pitchers for their rotation makes me wonder how close they feel Mathews is to being a productive MLB starting pitcher.
The three brought in are no guarantees of starting. Second, with all the pitching they brought in, it’s a saturation of arms. Matthews may be a part of that group.
I hope so. At 25, it's about time.
Post Reply