Can Mizzou still get in the NCAA Tourney without winning the SEC Tourney?

[woofy25]

Unless they start shooting lights out from 3-point range I can barely see them winning 5 of the last 11 games. The end of the season could get very ugly.

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

[onemizzou]

Unless they start shooting lights out from 3-point range I can barely see them winning 5 of the last 11 games. The end of the season could get very ugly.

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

[Sophrosyne]

Unless they start shooting lights out from 3-point range I can barely see them winning 5 of the last 11 games. The end of the season could get very ugly.

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?
TO is 4 for his last 7 from 3. He just needs to be a little bit of a threat to open the lanes, so he can pass guys open. Thank goodness for Barrett, or Missouri would dead in the water. Have never seen a regression like Ant. All mental.
Missouri has a better chance of going 5-4 than it does of winning three games in three days. I don’t see 5-4, personally. Too I consistent on the road and their home games are about to get a lot tougher.
I still completely disagree that they must be terrible since they barely beat OU. Thats just not how college basketball works.

Agree with you that Ant's regression is all mental at this point. He looks so tight when he shoots that I'm surprised the ball doesn't simply fall out of his hands when he attempts a shot (what point guard shoots an air ball when attempting a foul shot?). He still has the skills - he needs to get out of his own way and RELAX.

[woofy25]

Unless they start shooting lights out from 3-point range I can barely see them winning 5 of the last 11 games. The end of the season could get very ugly.

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

[onemizzou]

Unless they start shooting lights out from 3-point range I can barely see them winning 5 of the last 11 games. The end of the season could get very ugly.

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

[woofy25]

If they beat all but their ranked opponents they will go 12-6.

And get in.

Of course..... it won't go down that way, we all know it.

I'll just say I'm more optimistic than you on this (dire) and let the games play out. They have a path but they can't mess around.

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

Ah. Won’t admit that someone disagreed with you and made a solid point. Didn’t expect anything more.

[onemizzou]

Did you watch the OU game? We needed to TWO miracles to beat a shytty OU squad, ON OUR HOME COURT. And you think we're going to win 6 games down the stretch? Optimistic is one way to put it. Delusional is another.

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

Ah. Won’t admit that someone disagreed with you and made a solid point. Didn’t expect anything more.

You made no point. You completely missed an obvious reference then tried to move the goal post. Typical of those who lose the argument. Have a good day sir.

[woofy25]

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

Ah. Won’t admit that someone disagreed with you and made a solid point. Didn’t expect anything more.

You made no point. You completely missed an obvious reference then tried to move the goal post. Typical of those who lose the argument. Have a good day sir.

Ha. My point was that Oklahoma is competitive and Mizzou winning by one point shouldn’t make you feel like Missouri sucks. You disagreed and continued to use the “reference” ZeroU while ZeroU went on to beat Vanderbilt on the road. It’s clear my point was validated while yours was proven wrong. Thats how it goes sometimes.

[icon]

Joe Lunardi has Missouri in now after last night's victory at Texas A&M.

[woofy25]

Alabama beat OU by 2 and Arkansas beat them by 4. Against A&M it was a one possession game with one minute left. They had a 16 point lead against Nebraska but ended up losing by 6
No, they're not winning, but OU is competitive.

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

Ah. Won’t admit that someone disagreed with you and made a solid point. Didn’t expect anything more.

You made no point. You completely missed an obvious reference then tried to move the goal post. Typical of those who lose the argument. Have a good day sir.

Are you willing to admit that Oklahoma is a competitive team and Missouri winning by 1 wasn’t a disaster after all?

[onemizzou]

I love when people use 12 "close" losses as proof of competency.

There was no mention of 12 of anything, so your competency comment is clearly projection.

The post was an obvious acknowledgement that this league has a bunch of teams similar to Mizzou in that there are significant flaws, and any team can beat any other team.

The post also obviously pointed out that Missouri is not the only team that has struggled against OU. Nobody said OU is good, rather I said they are competitive, which they are.

But, go ahead and put the blinders on and continue thinking all the other SEC teams have rock solid lineups with no weaknesses except for Missouri.

Upsets happen all the time in college basketball. Do you get the correlation with "Cinderella"? So, to call out one game (and one that Missouri won) as some sort of indictment about how bad they are, shows a real lack of understanding the college game. That, or it's willful ignorance, or just good ole' trolling.

ZeroU is a garbage team that Mizzou needed two miracles to beat AT HOME. Can Mizzou get to The Tourney without (lets forget about winning) doing extremely well in the SEC Tourney, like three wins? I very much doubt it. It could happen but not without Ant returning to and actually improving on what he was before falling into this funk he's in. TO is doing quite well at the point but pretty quickly teams will figure out how to guard a player that (inconceivably) doesn't have a jump shot (literally NO jump shot) and he won't be able to drive as easily as he has been.

What does ZeroU even mean?

Jesus Christ, dude.

It's a terrible joke. Not really even funny for 14 year olds.

No, it's an accurate description of, in my opinion, one of our most hated foes.

RE OU/Vandy - Do you get it now?

You didn't get it and I don't care about the rest.

Ah. Won’t admit that someone disagreed with you and made a solid point. Didn’t expect anything more.

You made no point. You completely missed an obvious reference then tried to move the goal post. Typical of those who lose the argument. Have a good day sir.

Are you willing to admit that Oklahoma is a competitive team and Missouri winning by 1 wasn’t a disaster after all?

No