Jiricek
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
John Cocktoastin
- Forum User
- Posts: 802
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:00 pm
Re: Jiricek
I'd insert him in our 3 on 3 OT today. (Half serious)
-
callitwhatyouwant
- Forum User
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm
Re: Jiricek
It’s pretty insane how the haters can’t have an open mind. It was very clear by the talking heads that jiricek was a top 10 pick if he was healthy. The blues did the boom or bust. The kid has excelled every step of the way so far. I only watched the Canada game but he was the most talked about on his team. Hopefully we hit a couple home runs with Lindstein and jiricek and can extend broberg. If that happens. It’s looks like those 3 with LM have a pretty bright future for the note.John Cocktoastin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:28 pm Welp.
I'd say his recent performance before the tournament nudged his timeline up a bit.
Maybe this tournament is moving it even more.
Unbelievable.
-
BleedingBleu
- Forum User
- Posts: 549
- Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am
Re: Jiricek
John Cocktoastin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:18 pm Not exactly hard-hitting journalism, but here is a video with him at the tournament...
Link

I assume that was the aftermath of a high stick?
-
John Cocktoastin
- Forum User
- Posts: 802
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:00 pm
Re: Jiricek
Agreed, CIWYW. But if you look at Harry's post on the last page, clearly the Blues knew what they were getting and were more than happy to have him drop. As has been said a million times, their scouting department is second to none.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 19:39 pmIt’s pretty insane how the haters can’t have an open mind. It was very clear by the talking heads that jiricek was a top 10 pick if he was healthy. The blues did the boom or bust. The kid has excelled every step of the way so far. I only watched the Canada game but he was the most talked about on his team. Hopefully we hit a couple home runs with Lindstein and jiricek and can extend broberg. If that happens. It’s looks like those 3 with LM have a pretty bright future for the note.John Cocktoastin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:28 pm Welp.
I'd say his recent performance before the tournament nudged his timeline up a bit.
Maybe this tournament is moving it even more.
Unbelievable.
[Army] "We think he’s a legitimate top-four defenseman, and they’re hard to find."
Re: Jiricek
Didn’t Army seem to imply at some point that they would’ve taken him over Buium and they were starting to sweat about how it would look if that option came to pass?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 18:19 pm“We were excited when we heard (the Detroit Red Wings select forward Michael Brandsegg-Nygård) before us at No. 15,” Blues general manager Doug Armstrong said. “We had our eyes set on the guy we got. He’s got range, skating ability. He makes a good first pass. We think he’s a legitimate top-four defenseman, and they’re hard to find.”dhsux wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 18:10 pmYeah Harry....where are those folks?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:25 pm Bu bu but it was a bust of a draft pick Army doesn't know anything they took an injured kid
The one's who always know dead certain.....before any one.
-
2forDiving
- Forum User
- Posts: 907
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Jiricek
I don’t know that it was ever confirmed it was Buium, but they didn’t name the player and most assumed it was Buium.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 19:49 pmDidn’t Army seem to imply at some point that they would’ve taken him over Buium and they were starting to sweat about how it would look if that option came to pass?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 18:19 pm“We were excited when we heard (the Detroit Red Wings select forward Michael Brandsegg-Nygård) before us at No. 15,” Blues general manager Doug Armstrong said. “We had our eyes set on the guy we got. He’s got range, skating ability. He makes a good first pass. We think he’s a legitimate top-four defenseman, and they’re hard to find.”dhsux wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 18:10 pmYeah Harry....where are those folks?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:25 pm Bu bu but it was a bust of a draft pick Army doesn't know anything they took an injured kid
The one's who always know dead certain.....before any one.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 387
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
-
Zizzle1297
- Forum User
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: 08 May 2023 21:08 pm
Re: Jiricek
absolutely slick move! The kid is proven me wrong. I was the first to admit I thought it was going to be a bad pick but as long as he stays healthy the sky is the limit.
-
John Cocktoastin
- Forum User
- Posts: 802
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:00 pm
Re: Jiricek
Jiricek making early claim for top D
The internet was abuzz with Jiricek’s highlight reel overtime winner. While it was a great high-skill play to secure a big win for the Czechs over Finland, Jiricek has been a nightly standout so far. He’s been a hard, pain-in-the-(donkey) competitor for opponents who has broken up a ton of plays while making plenty of his own offensively. The towering right shot looks like a future top-four NHL D for the Blues and is the early leader for the best defenseman in this tournament.
— Pronman
The internet was abuzz with Jiricek’s highlight reel overtime winner. While it was a great high-skill play to secure a big win for the Czechs over Finland, Jiricek has been a nightly standout so far. He’s been a hard, pain-in-the-(donkey) competitor for opponents who has broken up a ton of plays while making plenty of his own offensively. The towering right shot looks like a future top-four NHL D for the Blues and is the early leader for the best defenseman in this tournament.
— Pronman
-
Rollin' on the River
- Forum User
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am
Re: Jiricek
I’m willing to admit that I possibly jumped the gun on Jiricek to this point.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 19:39 pmIt’s pretty insane how the haters can’t have an open mind. It was very clear by the talking heads that jiricek was a top 10 pick if he was healthy. The blues did the boom or bust. The kid has excelled every step of the way so far. I only watched the Canada game but he was the most talked about on his team. Hopefully we hit a couple home runs with Lindstein and jiricek and can extend broberg. If that happens. It’s looks like those 3 with LM have a pretty bright future for the note.John Cocktoastin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025 17:28 pm Welp.
I'd say his recent performance before the tournament nudged his timeline up a bit.
Maybe this tournament is moving it even more.
Unbelievable.
Head and knee injuries were a concern as well as a slight frame. So I don’t feel my initial concern was unwarranted.
That being said, I won’t root against the kid just because I like being correct, and I’m really glad that he’s improving at the rate he is thus far. Especially after last season and getting back into the game after a long time out. The organization need him to pan out. Badly.
Re: Jiricek
I'd play Jiricek next season too. He can't possibly be worse than Mailloux has been this season.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 12:07 pmWell Faulk will likely be moved so that means Army is gonna have to acquire someone in the offseason, otherwise we are looking at Mailloux and Kessel to fill those spots. An offseason signing or trade possibly blocks Jiricek for a couple of years, depending on how well Mailloux progresses.seattleblue wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 10:43 amdoubtful IMO. has a long way to go defensivelyPierre McGuire wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025 21:13 pmHe will be in the Blues top 4 opening night 2026John Cocktoastin wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025 21:10 pmWow!! Can't wait for him to get here...whenever that may be.
Personally I’d rather see Jircek here. We drafted him for a reason, and he’s developing nicely. I’m a firm believer in throwing them into the fire and learning. If he needs time in the AHL, his play or training camp will dictate that.
-
Rollin' on the River
- Forum User
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am
Re: Jiricek
3v3 or not, I’d prefer he focused on defense because if 17 loses the puck it’s a 2v0 the other direction.juan good eye wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 02:12 am Did not expect to see this from a dman
https://x.com/tsn_sports/status/2005780 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Sick goal, sure. But I’d prefer he stayed at the blueline
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 260
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Jiricek
Crazy thought here, but I bet his team preferred that he scored the game winning goal in OT.Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 08:58 am3v3 or not, I’d prefer he focused on defense because if 17 loses the puck it’s a 2v0 the other direction.juan good eye wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 02:12 am Did not expect to see this from a dman
https://x.com/tsn_sports/status/2005780 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Sick goal, sure. But I’d prefer he stayed at the blueline
-
Rollin' on the River
- Forum User
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: 24 May 2024 00:27 am
Re: Jiricek
Worked out this time. Against a better team they may not be so luckyThe Average Gatsby wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 16:04 pmCrazy thought here, but I bet his team preferred that he scored the game winning goal in OT.Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 08:58 am3v3 or not, I’d prefer he focused on defense because if 17 loses the puck it’s a 2v0 the other direction.juan good eye wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 02:12 am Did not expect to see this from a dman
https://x.com/tsn_sports/status/2005780 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Sick goal, sure. But I’d prefer he stayed at the blueline
Re: Jiricek
Did you not just oppose his selection in the draft but thought it was fool hardy?Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 17:12 pmWorked out this time. Against a better team they may not be so luckyThe Average Gatsby wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 16:04 pmCrazy thought here, but I bet his team preferred that he scored the game winning goal in OT.Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 08:58 am3v3 or not, I’d prefer he focused on defense because if 17 loses the puck it’s a 2v0 the other direction.juan good eye wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 02:12 am Did not expect to see this from a dman
https://x.com/tsn_sports/status/2005780 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Sick goal, sure. But I’d prefer he stayed at the blueline
So many posters on here were really ragging on this pick.
And yes, there's a long way to go to know how this ends up.
-
John Cocktoastin
- Forum User
- Posts: 802
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:00 pm
Re: Jiricek
The thing is, he wasn't positioned there on accident. He saw space (IQ), took advantage of a defensive lapse and capitalized. I don't think he was taking an unnecessary risk. He identified an opportunity then absolutely dominated.Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 17:12 pmWorked out this time. Against a better team they may not be so luckyThe Average Gatsby wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 16:04 pmCrazy thought here, but I bet his team preferred that he scored the game winning goal in OT.Rollin' on the River wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 08:58 am3v3 or not, I’d prefer he focused on defense because if 17 loses the puck it’s a 2v0 the other direction.juan good eye wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025 02:12 am Did not expect to see this from a dman
https://x.com/tsn_sports/status/2005780 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Sick goal, sure. But I’d prefer he stayed at the blueline