May deal terms officially announced
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
FG's model predictions for May in 2026:
152 IP
8.33 K/9
3.32 BB/9
1.13 HR/9
4.20 ERA
152 IP
8.33 K/9
3.32 BB/9
1.13 HR/9
4.20 ERA
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14934
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
How accurate are these predictions.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:37 am FG's model predictions for May in 2026:
152 IP
8.33 K/9
3.32 BB/9
1.13 HR/9
4.20 ERA
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
It still astounds me. The owners wonder why blue collar people no longer attend as many games as they used to. Tickets are sky high to pay these salaries. $12 million to pitch 20 times a year. Good work if you can get it.AnExParrot wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 05:00 amDespite spending most of his career throwing fewer than 130 innings per season, Blake Snell got an AAV north of 36 mil for 5 years. That's why Dustin May gets 12.5 mil.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 21:30 pmThe money in baseball astounds me. $12.5 million for a pitcher with chronic health issues.icon wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:41 pmYeah, this is a major c*** shoot. We shall see soon enough.cardstatman wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:16 pm The new face of the franchise has been signed. Cardinals 2026 marketing slogan: Come and see your Cardinals players be "dust in May"!![]()
May has 6.059 years of service time and will be 28 in 2026.
He has never delivered more than $10.1M in value in any season so far.
So this is the Cardinals paying May $12.5M to be what he's never been before.
If he is successful for the 1st time, he will decline his option and leave as a free agent.
If he fails for the 7th consecutive time, they wasted $12.5M on a pitcher who has managed to throw more than 56 IP only once.
Fits with the Gorman/Walker theme of hoping for a dramatic turnaround.![]()
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14934
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
I don’t know why it astounds you. All things are at all time highs. Once you pay the essentials not much left as you noted. This doesn’t affect the owners like it does the blue collar.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:45 amIt still astounds me. The owners wonder why blue collar people no longer attend as many games as they used to. Tickets are sky high to pay these salaries.AnExParrot wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 05:00 amDespite spending most of his career throwing fewer than 130 innings per season, Blake Snell got an AAV north of 36 mil for 5 years. That's why Dustin May gets 12.5 mil.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 21:30 pmThe money in baseball astounds me. $12.5 million for a pitcher with chronic health issues.icon wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:41 pmYeah, this is a major c*** shoot. We shall see soon enough.cardstatman wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:16 pm The new face of the franchise has been signed. Cardinals 2026 marketing slogan: Come and see your Cardinals players be "dust in May"!![]()
May has 6.059 years of service time and will be 28 in 2026.
He has never delivered more than $10.1M in value in any season so far.
So this is the Cardinals paying May $12.5M to be what he's never been before.
If he is successful for the 1st time, he will decline his option and leave as a free agent.
If he fails for the 7th consecutive time, they wasted $12.5M on a pitcher who has managed to throw more than 56 IP only once.
Fits with the Gorman/Walker theme of hoping for a dramatic turnaround.![]()
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
The models will give you a "best estimate," but actual results could be significantly different. Obviously, for example, May could get hurt in ST and be out for the entire year.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:44 amHow accurate are these predictions.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:37 am FG's model predictions for May in 2026:
152 IP
8.33 K/9
3.32 BB/9
1.13 HR/9
4.20 ERA
The model can only really tell you: based off his last season, and to some extent what he showed in prior seasons, his age, etc., this is a reasonable expectation if he remains as healthy as he could be expected to be in 2026.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14934
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Thanx. I think he stays healthy. In fact I see a 15-6 type year, provided he is allowed to pitch for not the sixth and seventh innings. No bullpen No Decisions.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:49 amThe models will give you a "best estimate," but actual results could be significantly different. Obviously, for example, May could get hurt in ST and be out for the entire year.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:44 amHow accurate are these predictions.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:37 am FG's model predictions for May in 2026:
152 IP
8.33 K/9
3.32 BB/9
1.13 HR/9
4.20 ERA
The model can only really tell you: based off his last season, and to some extent what he showed in prior seasons, his age, etc., this is a reasonable expectation if he remains as healthy as he could be expected to be in 2026.
Is a 15-6 season in his kit bag.
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
I like the signing, but to the folks thinking he will stay healthy- did you not learn anything from the Steven Matz experience? I don't think anyone said Matz was a bad pitcher. Over time it became clear that you couldn't count on him for 20 starts. I'm hoping for the best, but last year was his career high for innings at 132. Maybe in this case one year is a trend?
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14934
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Even if 132 is the new norm that’s 22 six inning starts.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:15 am I like the signing, but to the folks thinking he will stay healthy- did you not learn anything from the Steven Matz experience? I don't think anyone said Matz was a bad pitcher. Over time it became clear that you couldn't count on him for 20 starts. I'm hoping for the best, but last year was his career high for innings at 132. Maybe in this case one year is a trend?
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Well, let's take it to the board. What says the board on Dustin May's innings this year? Over 132, or under 132?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:19 amEven if 132 is the new norm that’s 22 six inning starts.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:15 am I like the signing, but to the folks thinking he will stay healthy- did you not learn anything from the Steven Matz experience? I don't think anyone said Matz was a bad pitcher. Over time it became clear that you couldn't count on him for 20 starts. I'm hoping for the best, but last year was his career high for innings at 132. Maybe in this case one year is a trend?
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14934
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Over. Prove it year. New team. Defensive team.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:21 amWell, let's take it to the board. What says the board on Dustin May's innings this year? Over 132, or under 132?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:19 amEven if 132 is the new norm that’s 22 six inning starts.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 07:15 am I like the signing, but to the folks thinking he will stay healthy- did you not learn anything from the Steven Matz experience? I don't think anyone said Matz was a bad pitcher. Over time it became clear that you couldn't count on him for 20 starts. I'm hoping for the best, but last year was his career high for innings at 132. Maybe in this case one year is a trend?
-
AnExParrot
- Forum User
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
You can get a ticket for under $10 most days of the week - that's cheaper than a seat in a movie theater. If a fan wants to go to a game(s) all but the truly destitute can do so.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 06:45 amIt still astounds me. The owners wonder why blue collar people no longer attend as many games as they used to. Tickets are sky high to pay these salaries. $12 million to pitch 20 times a year. Good work if you can get it.AnExParrot wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025 05:00 amDespite spending most of his career throwing fewer than 130 innings per season, Blake Snell got an AAV north of 36 mil for 5 years. That's why Dustin May gets 12.5 mil.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 21:30 pmThe money in baseball astounds me. $12.5 million for a pitcher with chronic health issues.icon wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:41 pmYeah, this is a major c*** shoot. We shall see soon enough.cardstatman wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:16 pm The new face of the franchise has been signed. Cardinals 2026 marketing slogan: Come and see your Cardinals players be "dust in May"!![]()
May has 6.059 years of service time and will be 28 in 2026.
He has never delivered more than $10.1M in value in any season so far.
So this is the Cardinals paying May $12.5M to be what he's never been before.
If he is successful for the 1st time, he will decline his option and leave as a free agent.
If he fails for the 7th consecutive time, they wasted $12.5M on a pitcher who has managed to throw more than 56 IP only once.
Fits with the Gorman/Walker theme of hoping for a dramatic turnaround.![]()
Re: May deal terms officially announced
It helps if you give up all hope for 2026. Look forward to the great season that 2028 will be.cardstatman wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:38 pmPitching innings has not been his area of strength.RunSup wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:23 pmMay is here to pitch innings in 2026 and let other arms develop in AAA. The team needs arms.cardstatman wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:16 pm The new face of the franchise has been signed. Cardinals 2026 marketing slogan: Come and see your Cardinals players be "dust in May"!![]()
May has 6.059 years of service time and will be 28 in 2026.
He has never delivered more than $10.1M in value in any season so far.
So this is the Cardinals paying May $12.5M to be what he's never been before.
If he is successful for the 1st time, he will decline his option and leave as a free agent.
If he fails for the 7th consecutive time, they wasted $12.5M on a pitcher who has managed to throw more than 56 IP only once.
Fits with the Gorman/Walker theme of hoping for a dramatic turnaround.![]()
If the Cardinals stink and May is good they can trade him at the deadline.
If May is worthy they can work to extend him. Health risk accepted. Just don't eat salad.
Yeah I gotta find other things to do. Maybe go to the Zoo and Forest Park more often. Explore the Blues and Chess museums. Find interesting good eats. Read a book?
But really I have trouble looking away from this team.
PS. I used to feel things too about this team too. I embrace the grey numbness now. (That's gotta be a song reference somehow)
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14281
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
They needed a starter and that $12.5M comes from the savings they achieved from dealing S. Gray w/plenty of money from that deal left over.Hoosier59 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 15:44 pmI don’t think there is anybody who doesn’t think he’ll pitch pretty well, if he’s healthy. But that is the BIG question!rockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:31 pm Thx strummer
I could get burned by this but I think May could be a huge surprise in 2026 as long a she stays healthy.
Will he stay healthy enough to justify 12.5 million dollars. If he’s healthy, it’s a steal, but hasn’t been to date.
The Cardinals aren’t going to spend a lot of money on next year’s team, we all know they can afford to, but they’re not going to do it. So, what little money they are willing to spend, they just spent 12.5 mil of it on a big risk. This move really looks a lot like something Mo would do. Based a move on a hope and a prayer. Let’s hope Bloom has better luck at it than Mo did.
I've always said BDWJr's business plan has been to re-invest any contract money that comes off the books, good to see that hasn't changed.
ANY pitcher is a risk w/injury right around the corner on every pitch.
May passed his physical and is a sound as any pitcher at this time.
Let's hope it stays that way.
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14281
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Hey, Mahle was my second choice too zuck:zuck698 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 17:27 pmRock if you get burned , so do I. Him or Mahle were the 2 that I would hope they would go after. High upside, low cost options. I am going to predict he stays healthy, wins 15 games with a 3.78 ERA next year.rockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:31 pm Thx strummer
I could get burned by this but I think May could be a huge surprise in 2026 as long a she stays healthy.
What the old saying, wish in one hand, ____, in the other! LOL The guy has just nasty stuff and I am rolling with the due to stay healthy factor with him. Will be fun to look back next year at this time and see how "charred" we both are.![]()
by rockondlouie » 26 Nov 2025 10:22 am
Agree w/others JoJo likely part of a package w/Donny if C. Bloom is to land a young major league starter w/years of control.
Of the one-year guys, I'd take a shot at:
Dustin May
Tyler Mahle
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14281
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Same here melMelville wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 18:49 pmAgreed.rockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:46 pmUnlike Lance and Kyle, Mays got upside left in his young career.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:40 pmI'm bullish on the guy. Still young. Always had knock-out stuff. We didn't give much less to guys like Lynn or Gibson, and in the case of Gibson, guys who never had knock-out stuff.rockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:31 pm Thx strummer
I could get burned by this but I think May could be a huge surprise in 2026 as long a she stays healthy.
Worst case scenario, he's a bum and/or can't stay healthy and he's gone by this time next year.
Low Risk/High reward move.
I love it!
And, the move confirms what I have been saying for months - Bloom is NOT willing to throw away the 2026 season.
Been saying for many months this isn't Mo in charge, Bloom is capable of Walking (rebuilding and restocking the minor league system) & Chewing Gum (still fielding a decent 2026/2027 team) at the same time.
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 14281
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: May deal terms officially announced
Yet another year further from his injuries and hopefully that control is sharper!ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 20:29 pmhttps://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... du01.shtmlrockondlouie wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 14:31 pm Thx strummer
I could get burned by this but I think May could be a huge surprise in 2026 as long a she stays healthy.
Looking at his numbers I'd say walks are a little high consider the strikeout numbers. Pitched 6 innings 11 times in 23 starts in 2025. Ceiling probably a #3 starter but the big if obviously is staying healthy.
I'd say given his pedigree if he were to stay healthy and reach his full potential, then he's got low #2 stuff and his floor should be that #3.