Good for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Never about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals - and that is what is important.
Exactly as I predicted.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
If that was even close to true, you'd let others sing your praises.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals.
Exactly as I predicted.
As is, it being self-promotion.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Others are welcome to sign my praises if they so desire.renostl wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:01 pmIf that was even close to true, you'd let others sing your praises.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals.
Exactly as I predicted.
As is, it being self-promotion.
Certainly not necessary nor requested.
And I certainly will not ever do so myself.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
If you consider Miller a #1 or a #2.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:06 pmOthers are welcome to sign my praises if they so desire.renostl wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:01 pmIf that was even close to true, you'd let others sing your praises.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals.
Exactly as I predicted.
As is, it being self-promotion.
Certainly not necessary nor requested.
And I certainly will not ever do so myself.
How much is needed to add to Donovan to get a TOR?
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Do you think a #3 and #7 prospect are enough for Donovan?Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals - and that is what is important.
Exactly as I predicted.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Numbers aren't important.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:14 pmDo you think a #3 and #7 prospect are enough for Donovan?Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals - and that is what is important.
Exactly as I predicted.
For instance their #4 and a pick might be preferable,
or #4 and #5, or #4 and #6.
Or only their #1 and I'd add significant to Donovan.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
I have previously stated neither of the floated packages from SEA or SF are acceptable.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:14 pmDo you think a #3 and #7 prospect are enough for Donovan?Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:57 pmNever about me.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:54 pmGood for you.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 13:06 pmAnd during ST of that spring, I alone correctly predicted Donovan would be the first of the STL prospects on the rise at the time to reach MLB and would prove to be the best of the bunch.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:44 pmThose rankings are notoriously unreliable.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:06 pmThat's not happening from any team.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 12:00 pm If the rumor is true that they were offering their #3 and #7 prospect for our best player that would be big no for me unless we get a legit MLB player who can fill a hole in addition the #3 and #7.
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2022/cardinals/
Prior to 2022 - Donovan's rookie season - MLB.com had him ranked as #12 in the Cardinals system.
Which is exactly what happened.
Rankings are unreliable as you correctly point out - but I am not.
Only and always about the game.
And Donovan has been very good for the Cardinals - and that is what is important.
Exactly as I predicted.
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8762
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Wake me if it ever happens.
Talk is cheap
Can Bloom make it happen
-
smilinjoefission
- Forum User
- Posts: 679
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Would you trade Woo for Donovan? 2024 Bryce Miller would be an ideal return for Donovan, and given his 2025 season it's doable. Plus 4 years of control. Yeah I want Woo, but I'd settle for Miller +.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 14:27 pm I'd shot higher than B. Miller...............it's Woo or nothing!![]()
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Correct.smilinjoefission wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 17:54 pmWould you trade Woo for Donovan? 2024 Bryce Miller would be an ideal return for Donovan, and given his 2025 season it's doable. Plus 4 years of control. Yeah I want Woo, but I'd settle for Miller +.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 14:27 pm I'd shot higher than B. Miller...............it's Woo or nothing!![]()
But I would go bigger on both sides.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Bloom has conceded 2026. He wouldn’t be interested in moving Contreras or gray if the 2026 win/loss record was all that important. Bloom would’ve quite happy with one more top 10 pick, imoMelville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:58 amYou are assuming Bloom is willing to throw away the 2026 season and possibly 2027 as well.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
That is a false assumption on your part.
It would be incredibly damaging to an already deeply wounded franchise.
Nieth Bloom nor DeWitt are quite that stupid.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Because an extension is off the table. They could have done last offseason but chose not to. Now, the new regime as the same opportunity and they’re clearly more interested in trading him. There is no reason to consider and extension is on the table. Therefore, he must be traded and must be traded this offseason. Waiting is for fools. People on here should finally be able to see that now, if they’re paying 5 minutes of attentionMelville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:54 amIncorrect.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Why trade 2 years of Donvan for just one prospect who may provide zero quality MLB seasons in return?
That achieves nothing.
The CORRCET BASEBALL DECISION is to extend Donovan - but if the player rejects the extension or Bloom is simply incorrectly dead set on dealing him now, the return MUST include one young player who has already shown some level at success at the MLB level and a 2nd prospect piece.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Bryce Miller was not good in 2025. Is there something that doesn't show up in his stats?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:58 pmWake me if it ever happens.
Talk is cheap
Can Bloom make it happen
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Probably not. I believe franchises need to understand where each player fits in the puzzle in order to complete it. Right now, if the cardinals extend Donovan, then his piece of the puzzle is placed in the wrong spot. He is the best or 2nd best player on the team, which means the cardinals are essentially building around him. For a contending team, Donovan is an everyday starter, but not the star of the show. He’s a complementary piece.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 05:07 amNice response. You make good points. If the cba was not looming, would your model change.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
In order to compete again, the cardinals, first, need stars. They either need to decide to buy them or develop them. Until that happens, having Donovan on the team as a centerpiece to the puzzle would an act of futility.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14240
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Another good write. Buy or develop. Meaning now or future. Which gives the most advantage and one is instant gratification and the other is the dreaded waiting game.woofy25 wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025 07:38 amProbably not. I believe franchises need to understand where each player fits in the puzzle in order to complete it. Right now, if the cardinals extend Donovan, then his piece of the puzzle is placed in the wrong spot. He is the best or 2nd best player on the team, which means the cardinals are essentially building around him. For a contending team, Donovan is an everyday starter, but not the star of the show. He’s a complementary piece.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 05:07 amNice response. You make good points. If the cba was not looming, would your model change.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
In order to compete again, the cardinals, first, need stars. They either need to decide to buy them or develop them. Until that happens, having Donovan on the team as a centerpiece to the puzzle would an act of futility.