Practice Lines (10/17)
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 31 May 2024 22:31 pm
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
To be fair to joseph, he single handed on the road generated two goals by making the right play regardless of the punishment he'd take for it. This is the kind of move we've been lacking a lot of in the offensive zone, and it probably would open up a chance or two for Kyrou to score thanks to his work. I'd rather suter be on that line in between them, but it is what it is.
We eventually could benefit from an additional forward for depth if we have two injured guys not able to slide into the lineup. Hard to do much other than shuffle lines if we are essentially as 12 active forwards on the NHL roster.
We eventually could benefit from an additional forward for depth if we have two injured guys not able to slide into the lineup. Hard to do much other than shuffle lines if we are essentially as 12 active forwards on the NHL roster.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Any line a Buch is on will struggle offensively and defensively. I wish we would have sent him to the Habs instead of Bolduc. His contract is an embarrassment,
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Mailloux deserved no more than Buch.
Unfortunately,the Canadiens would rather take a pack of ugly wolves than Buch.
Thanks. Army.
Now we have the ugly wolves for another 5 years
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 792
- Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
I like Buch with Suter and Snuggy. I also think Holloway with Jake and Thomas will be a handful for teams to handle.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
That's the spirit.Army's Mom wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:45 amOn the plus side, if DAL keeps with their season average and scores five goals, that'd be a three-goal improvement for the Blues' D...
I'll see myself out.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Don't know if I'd really call it the 3rd line.ScalesofJustice wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 21:14 pmI agree...Kyrou on the 3rd line is a very questionable move but it might open up the ice some for him.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:35 amA game or two from the high seats for Logan with Chopper and likely Prongs will do the young fella some good.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:16 amNeighbours to the right side, Buch down to line 2, Snuggy up to line 2, Kyrou down to line 3. The lines are all jumbled.Holloway-Thomas-Neighbours
Buchnevich-Suter-Snuggerud
Joseph-Schenn-Kyrou
Texier-Bjugsrad-Walker
Fowler-Parayko
Broberg-Faulk
Tucker-Kessel
Mailloux
Binnington
Hofer
* Sundqvist (LBI) and Toropchenko (LBI/UBI) not skating again.
Unsurprisingly, Kessel being given a chance. Probably likely to slot in for Mailloux for the next game.
We are moving Kyrou to the 3rd line? Not sure how I feel about that one.
Kessel and Tucker will also very likely be a disaster.
More likely this will be very temporary.
He's still got Schenn as his center so it's not line that line is without skill.
IMO it's more like evening out the skill level on the middle lines. Tonight's TOI will tell us which one is the 2nd line and which is the 3rd.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
The Spirit of St. Louis?keithinwr wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 09:27 amThat's the spirit.Army's Mom wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:45 amOn the plus side, if DAL keeps with their season average and scores five goals, that'd be a three-goal improvement for the Blues' D...
I'll see myself out.
I hope so. Losing at all, much less losing badly again tonight. makes for an 0-3 home record. We have the Kings and John Kelley returning this Tuesday and the orphan/vagabond team from Utah shows up Thursday to try and keep us below them in the division.
The boys need a SPARK. It can come from our Goalies- they have been victims of awful bounces and questionable (overconfident) decisions in half of our games, but it would be so wonderful if all the forward lines play well. That has not happened yet.
Will Holloway continue his rise from the grave on the top line?
Will Buch benefit from not facing the Stars No.1 checking line?
Will Kyrou stop hesitating and THINKING alongside Joseph and Schenner and start using his legendary speed?
Will Texier, with his top-notch puck possession instincts and skills, continue to compliment Walker and Bjugstad and justify their trio being the only one not-juggled?
Our top Four, kept intact, are danged good.
Sitting Mailloux is the best decision Monty could make and he handled it well. Hearing about Mailloux staying so long , alone, after practice working on improvement , consistency, and confiidence keeps me smiling about his future. He may never be an all-star, but any teenager, whose signing was condemned by several of the highest ranking members of his country's Parliament... is no stranger to overcoming awful situations.
Kessel can flat out HIT opponents. That third pairing will be an adventure, but neither of them lack for guts.
Let's go Blues!
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
If he does have a chat it will be big picture and positive, pretty much what he said he would tell him during his interview.Unfathomable wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 20:58 pmFwiw I think pronger mentioned on his interview on the fast lane yesterday the Dallas game would be his first blues broadcast. So wouldn't surprise me if he is in mailloux ear tomorrow. Wish the kid ALL the best think the pr comparison to the pronger trade was dumb at best.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 12:16 pmI’ve seen comments like this for years and I don’t get it. In all the years MacInnis has been employed by the Blues, I’ve heard of zero times of him working with a player directly. I’m not even sure he works for the Blues fulltime. He’s an advisor to Army. Likely just someone Army gets an opinion from from time to time.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:35 amA game or two from the high seats for Logan with Chopper and likely Prongs will do the young fella some good.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:16 amNeighbours to the right side, Buch down to line 2, Snuggy up to line 2, Kyrou down to line 3. The lines are all jumbled.Holloway-Thomas-Neighbours
Buchnevich-Suter-Snuggerud
Joseph-Schenn-Kyrou
Texier-Bjugsrad-Walker
Fowler-Parayko
Broberg-Faulk
Tucker-Kessel
Mailloux
Binnington
Hofer
* Sundqvist (LBI) and Toropchenko (LBI/UBI) not skating again.
Unsurprisingly, Kessel being given a chance. Probably likely to slot in for Mailloux for the next game.
We are moving Kyrou to the 3rd line? Not sure how I feel about that one.
Kessel and Tucker will also very likely be a disaster.
And Pronger? He now with the FanDual broadcast so wouldn’t he be busy with that? And not like he’s been around a ton over the years. That said, has he even been on a FanDual broadcast yet? I saw where he was on Hockey Night in Canada the other night so I guess the FanDual thing isn’t every game. But either way, not like he’s just in the pressbox ready to give advice to whatever d-man is scratched that night.
Be yourself, first do what you do best and then learn from the rest.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Yeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Leddy is playing 20 minutes a night and is a -3 in 4 games and only 2 assists with the Sharks scoring 3/4 a night.rezero wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:51 amYeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 403
- Joined: 27 May 2024 14:31 pm
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
All I remember Doc....is that all the other teams we play will have different line-up's of players who are expected to do the same thing we want our Blues to do. Concidering teams don't change their line-up that much differently for every game, Monty isn't either. Just a decission after 4 games.
Switch, poke, press, and move around players isn't as big of a thing as simply trying to put the best of what you believe your team should be on the ice every game. The entire team has to want to beat the other guys really, really bad. I don't believe line numbers mean that much either. JMO
Switch, poke, press, and move around players isn't as big of a thing as simply trying to put the best of what you believe your team should be on the ice every game. The entire team has to want to beat the other guys really, really bad. I don't believe line numbers mean that much either. JMO
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 801
- Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
Leddy needed to go. Is he part of the next truly contending Blues team? Nah. And Tucker replaced Suter in the playoffs. I understand the vet idea with this group, but Fowler, Colt, Faulk are vets. Leddy is 34 yo and was healthy enough to play 31 games last year. Is that the guy we are wishing for? I'm not.stlblue06 wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:03 pmLeddy is playing 20 minutes a night and is a -3 in 4 games and only 2 assists with the Sharks scoring 3/4 a night.rezero wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:51 amYeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
I mean actually yeah we could use a guy like that playing 13 minutes/night with Mailloux with favorable match ups....we sure could.b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:46 pmLeddy needed to go. Is he part of the next truly contending Blues team? Nah. And Tucker replaced Suter in the playoffs. I understand the vet idea with this group, but Fowler, Colt, Faulk are vets. Leddy is 34 yo and was healthy enough to play 31 games last year. Is that the guy we are wishing for? I'm not.stlblue06 wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:03 pmLeddy is playing 20 minutes a night and is a -3 in 4 games and only 2 assists with the Sharks scoring 3/4 a night.rezero wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:51 amYeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 801
- Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
I understand the thought process. I just disagree with going in that specific direction. A guy like that ... maybe. Leddy or Suter .. to me, no.skilles wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 13:05 pmI mean actually yeah we could use a guy like that playing 13 minutes/night with Mailloux with favorable match ups....we sure could.b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:46 pmLeddy needed to go. Is he part of the next truly contending Blues team? Nah. And Tucker replaced Suter in the playoffs. I understand the vet idea with this group, but Fowler, Colt, Faulk are vets. Leddy is 34 yo and was healthy enough to play 31 games last year. Is that the guy we are wishing for? I'm not.stlblue06 wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:03 pmLeddy is playing 20 minutes a night and is a -3 in 4 games and only 2 assists with the Sharks scoring 3/4 a night.rezero wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:51 amYeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Similarly, a physical presence who can skate and hit ... sure. Lucic? No. He's not the guy people wish he was ... nor the guy that they remember.
Re: Practice Lines (10/17)
I go back and forth on whether Leddy would be great in that roleb-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 13:14 pmI understand the thought process. I just disagree with going in that specific direction. A guy like that ... maybe. Leddy or Suter .. to me, no.skilles wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 13:05 pmI mean actually yeah we could use a guy like that playing 13 minutes/night with Mailloux with favorable match ups....we sure could.b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:46 pmLeddy needed to go. Is he part of the next truly contending Blues team? Nah. And Tucker replaced Suter in the playoffs. I understand the vet idea with this group, but Fowler, Colt, Faulk are vets. Leddy is 34 yo and was healthy enough to play 31 games last year. Is that the guy we are wishing for? I'm not.stlblue06 wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 12:03 pmLeddy is playing 20 minutes a night and is a -3 in 4 games and only 2 assists with the Sharks scoring 3/4 a night.rezero wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:51 amYeah, imagine if we had Leddy and Bolduc instead of Mailloux. Rough offseason by Army.Frank Barone wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Similarly, a physical presence who can skate and hit ... sure. Lucic? No. He's not the guy people wish he was ... nor the guy that they remember.