Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 3474
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by sdaltons »

Ok it's today. What was decided?
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1394
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by ClassicO »

11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:52 am
Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
I could have fixed it years ago.
Hilarious. And Trump was going to end the Ukraine war in one day.
I don't see any posts from either of you over the past 60 days that suggest such a "fix."
In the absence of both of you pointing them out -- or even making your "fix" recommendations now -- I'll consider these posts as a joke.
11WSChamps
Forum User
Posts: 3442
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by 11WSChamps »

ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:09 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:52 am
Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
I could have fixed it years ago.
Hilarious. And Trump was going to end the Ukraine war in one day.
I don't see any posts from either of you over the past 60 days that suggest such a "fix."
In the absence of both of you pointing them out -- or even making your "fix" recommendations now -- I'll consider these posts as a joke.
My response was "years ago" and gave such an example in this thread.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10597
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by Cusecards »

ramfandan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:29 am
redbirdfan51 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:11 am If Pallante is put on the IL or demoted to the pen, who takes his place in the rotation?
That’s what the coaches are discussing today. Nobody at AAA seems ready ti take that spot.
One option would be… ok for every 5th start should that be sa bullpen game. Pitch three relievers 2 innings each, for example , for the first 6 innings. Then finish with your usual backend guys.
With 29 games remaining, they would need to do that just for 5 games.
If this was a decision in June, I would not do that but with 29 games left, if I was a coach at the meeting I would put forward that as an option especially if there is no consensus for one pitcher to replace Pallante.
Possible scenario with a BP game essentially.
You could even have Pallante serve as the “opener” in that scenario so if he is effective he could easily go more than two innings??
icon
Forum User
Posts: 5023
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by icon »

Cusecards wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:20 pm
ramfandan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:29 am
redbirdfan51 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:11 am If Pallante is put on the IL or demoted to the pen, who takes his place in the rotation?
That’s what the coaches are discussing today. Nobody at AAA seems ready ti take that spot.
One option would be… ok for every 5th start should that be sa bullpen game. Pitch three relievers 2 innings each, for example , for the first 6 innings. Then finish with your usual backend guys.
With 29 games remaining, they would need to do that just for 5 games.
If this was a decision in June, I would not do that but with 29 games left, if I was a coach at the meeting I would put forward that as an option especially if there is no consensus for one pitcher to replace Pallante.
Possible scenario with a BP game essentially.
You could even have Pallante serve as the “opener” in that scenario so if he is effective he could easily go more than two innings??
Why on would you have Pallante as an opener after he just allowed 5 in the 1st? To the Pirates? Not that it makes any difference at this point.
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1394
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by ClassicO »

11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:13 pm
ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:09 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:52 am
Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
I could have fixed it years ago.
Hilarious. And Trump was going to end the Ukraine war in one day.
I don't see any posts from either of you over the past 60 days that suggest such a "fix."
In the absence of both of you pointing them out -- or even making your "fix" recommendations now -- I'll consider these posts as a joke.
My response was "years ago" and gave such an example in this thread.
OK. So signing Harper is your answer. Only two problems:
1) You realize that Harper had to agree? Minor point. :( He said no to the Dodgers and Cubs, but I'm sure you could have convinced him. 8O
2) You had to convince BDW to sign him to the 13-year contract - the largest in MLB history at the time. He's less than 6 years into that deal.

And it's a big jump to say that IF they did that, they would not have made the Ozuna trade.


PS - "Years ago" is convenient. In the past few years, you didn't mention it again?
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 3474
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by sdaltons »

Cusecards wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:20 pm
ramfandan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:29 am
redbirdfan51 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:11 am If Pallante is put on the IL or demoted to the pen, who takes his place in the rotation?
That’s what the coaches are discussing today. Nobody at AAA seems ready ti take that spot.
One option would be… ok for every 5th start should that be sa bullpen game. Pitch three relievers 2 innings each, for example , for the first 6 innings. Then finish with your usual backend guys.
With 29 games remaining, they would need to do that just for 5 games.
If this was a decision in June, I would not do that but with 29 games left, if I was a coach at the meeting I would put forward that as an option especially if there is no consensus for one pitcher to replace Pallante.
Possible scenario with a BP game essentially.
You could even have Pallante serve as the “opener” in that scenario so if he is effective he could easily go more than two innings??
A bullpen start every 5th day is not realistic. The guys we have are already struggling to cover innings. They need to be less used, not more.
11WSChamps
Forum User
Posts: 3442
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by 11WSChamps »

ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:29 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:13 pm
ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:09 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:52 am
Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
I could have fixed it years ago.
Hilarious. And Trump was going to end the Ukraine war in one day.
I don't see any posts from either of you over the past 60 days that suggest such a "fix."
In the absence of both of you pointing them out -- or even making your "fix" recommendations now -- I'll consider these posts as a joke.
My response was "years ago" and gave such an example in this thread.
OK. So signing Harper is your answer. Only two problems:
1) You realize that Harper had to agree? Minor point. :( He said no to the Dodgers and Cubs, but I'm sure you could have convinced him. 8O
2) You had to convince BDW to sign him to the 13-year contract - the largest in MLB history at the time.

And it's a big jump to say that IF they did that, they would not have made the Ozuna trade.

PS - "Years ago" is convenient. In the past few years, you didn't mention it again?
Actually I have included signing Harper on several threads such as these for the last several seasons sorry you missed it.

As for the hypothetical the question was what I would do.

Not what I would do if I had to work under DeWitt. If you're going to restrict on one hand then you have to give some latitude on the other.

Why would they have to make the Ozuna trade?

The MOB would already be here.

Not to mention they wouldn't have had to go out and get stiffs like Mikolas, Lynn, Gibson, etc with Alcantra and Gallen having cost controlled years.
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 3474
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by sdaltons »

Scherzer would have been an obvious pickup.
Chitownredbird
Forum User
Posts: 79
Joined: 21 Apr 2025 20:55 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by Chitownredbird »

redbirdfan51 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:11 am If Pallante is put on the IL or demoted to the pen, who takes his place in the rotation?
Graceffo
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1394
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by ClassicO »

Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
You already told us all how to fix it! Here's a recap:

1. Sign Helsely to a 4-year extension at $17M a year.
2. "Acquire Murphy from ATL." Great idea - since another catcher is a key need. Ha ha. Oh, since you've made that post, he'(poop) .102/.267/.122/.389 in 60 PAs!
3. Play Pages full-time because he was another Pagnozzi! Compared PP to a 3-time gold-glover who hit a lot better. Ha.
4. Sign Chris Taylor for 3 yr./$45M - to play second base!!
5. Your ace was Dakota Hudson - "the most irreplaceable player on the Cardinals."
6. Dylan Carlson was your future star.
7. Play the UniKKorn at 2b. "Never been a LH hitting 2B in MLB history with his HR power ceiling."
8. Sign Conforto for 3 yr/$60M. ("He should be the #1 target for the Cardinals this offseason" (after 2021).

And what happened to that Arenado trade you predicted in 2023 - and often since? "He is as gone as the dinosaurs. You have my personal guarantee."

You couldn't fix a dull pencil. But you've proven that you can't fix stupid, because all 8 of those "fixes" you've recommended are very stupid.
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1394
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by ClassicO »

11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:37 pm
ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:29 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:13 pm
ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 16:09 pm
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:52 am
Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
I could have fixed it years ago.
Hilarious. And Trump was going to end the Ukraine war in one day.
I don't see any posts from either of you over the past 60 days that suggest such a "fix."
In the absence of both of you pointing them out -- or even making your "fix" recommendations now -- I'll consider these posts as a joke.
My response was "years ago" and gave such an example in this thread.
OK. So signing Harper is your answer. Only two problems:
1) You realize that Harper had to agree? Minor point. :( He said no to the Dodgers and Cubs, but I'm sure you could have convinced him. 8O
2) You had to convince BDW to sign him to the 13-year contract - the largest in MLB history at the time.

And it's a big jump to say that IF they did that, they would not have made the Ozuna trade.

PS - "Years ago" is convenient. In the past few years, you didn't mention it again?
Actually I have included signing Harper on several threads such as these for the last several seasons sorry you missed it.

As for the hypothetical the question was what I would do.

Not what I would do if I had to work under DeWitt. If you're going to restrict on one hand then you have to give some latitude on the other.

Why would they have to make the Ozuna trade?

The MOB would already be here.

Not to mention they wouldn't have had to go out and get stiffs like Mikolas, Lynn, Gibson, etc with Alcantra and Gallen having cost controlled years.
First, how do you fix it now?
Second, welcome to reality. The Harper deal wasn't a reality for the Cards. And repeating it doesn't make it a reality.
Third, everyone regrets the Ozuna trade in 2019, but you can't convince us you were outspoken against it at the time. Guess who was the top prospect the Cards gave up for him?
Last edited by ClassicO on 27 Aug 2025 17:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Stlcardsblues
Forum User
Posts: 953
Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by Stlcardsblues »

Melville wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:51 am
11WSChamps wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:49 am For those who feel the need to defend this spiral that's led to this hard not to admit what the ballclub has become.

And people actually believe this team can compete for the division next season.

Just brutal.
I could fix this roster in less than 30 days.
Any competent person could.
Not with the limitations DeWitt has placed. Those will make this at best a three more year run of mediocrity. Curious though what your fixes are?
Stlcardsblues
Forum User
Posts: 953
Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by Stlcardsblues »

I see a lot of requests to call people up to take spots. After McGreevy there is next to nothing that is worthy of calling up pitching wise.

Three or four who were looked at as options to fill in are injured. Calling up Matthews would be a massive mistake. He has struggled at Triple A most of the season. He put together two really good games (saw both and was hoping he was turning it anround) and then struggled again. He is not ready and rushing him could be a large setback. I saw Wilkerson mentioned. He isn’t the solution to anything even short-term.


Fixing this is going to take Bloom packaging good young talent for pitching. It’s not going to be Noot that gets it. It’s going to take a package around players like Herrera, Crooks, Winn. Not saying all of them, but those type players.

Mo is leaving this organization at a level of rot not seen since the early 90s.
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 6220
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by JuanAgosto »

BrummerStealsHome wrote: 27 Aug 2025 08:43 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 27 Aug 2025 07:36 am If there was a good option he would already be in St Louis.
The caveat to that is Curtis Taylor at Memphis, that 3dender mentioned above. The reason they haven't summoned him yet is that he's not on the 40-man roster.
As has been mentioned in other situations, the 40 man should not be an issue. There are multiple people on it that could easily come off. Its a lame excuse being used by the lazy front office.
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 6220
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: Decision on Pallante may be coming today

Post by JuanAgosto »

The biggest problem is we have two genuine bozos making this decision. The same two numbskulls that forgot to call the bullpen to get someone warmed up a few weeks ago. And the same two who have guided this mess. I wouldn't be surprised if their brilliant solution was to move Pallante to the bullpen and name him the opener every 5th day. :lol:
Post Reply