ClassicO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 17:08 pm
Why do so many seem compelled to argue that VSII needs more time to improve his woeful hitting, ignoring the facts?
Just compare his time in AAA to that of Nathan Church, who has almost the same range in CF as Scott and a far superior arm (24 assists in minors vs Scott's 11). Then consider their college careers to see if they were ever elite hitters. It seems obvious:
Scott
AAA - .210 .294 .303 .597 in 362 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.72 2.62
College - .254/.368/.419/.787
Church
AAA - .332/.396/.500/.896 in 213 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.70 2.53
College - .341/.405/.515/.920
Church throwing out runner in ST:
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/video/nat ... los-santos
So the question the OP was getting at I think was, what is the best lineup right now to try and win as many games as possibly as long as the Cards have a shot for the PO's this year, regardless of the odds being on the long side.
Imo, right now, VS2 is the CF guy for that.
Now next year, yes, to start the year I'd give VS2 some runway to show if once again he improved in the off season to keep his job, but if Church or Baez would challenge him for that spot, that'd be very sweet to see. Would love to see either one of them come in and earn the CF position. To me, it's all about improving the overall team, not the name on the back of a shirt.
For VS2, if he could just improve his OB% to at least the .320 range, he won't be that easy to beat out. His 30.6'/sec. sprint to catch that ball in late innings last night he might have made look relatively easy, but not many can close like that. Glad he was the guy out there, as that was a key play in the W.
Big fan of Baez btw, and am impressed with how Church has been playing. Quality OF depth would be ............... rare, but great to have.