Yep, the same 10 people responding, day after day, after day. They love to gang up. It makes them feel tough. We know their type.billybaseball wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 07:42 amThe people who jump on every posts that Shady posts are far worst than Shady's excessive and repetitive posting for sure. Why can't people just ignore stuff if they don't like it? Attacking someone for posting on a sports forum is pretty pathetic imo
Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 410
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
That should read, "It wouldn't be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either". Minus Arenado, 3B seems more "up in the air" than 2B. Of course, hitting is essential. And it's ideal to have some power at 3B. Arm strength/throwing ability may also be factors.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:16 pmThey could to up his utility but its not necessarily needed if they dont want to overwhelm him learning positions and hitting. Gorman or donovan could always move to 3b while he stays at 2b since thats their original position and saggese or fermin or whoever is still here could also move to 3b so theres no real need. None of those guys are great at ss so it makes sense to keep his defense up as the backup ssShady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:56 pmIt would be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:30 pmTrue its not exact same which is why he is getting a few starts there as well although majority have been at ss.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:53 amgenerally agree with this, but no reason not to play both. the turn for the DP is way different for 2bmen, and having played both, I found the throw to 1st strange.. just a wierd body angle... but maybe I'm just wierd lol I did don the tools/gear of ignorance for several yearsWattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:40 amWetherholt had already played 2b 17 times this year. This ismt a sudden change.
And if you can play ss you can play 2b. Ss is just harder. And wetherholt will continue to get most his starts there in minors. Cuz even once he arrives, they can shift him to ss if winn is injured since there are no other great options. He also will be the backup ss too. Theres no reason to just have him only playing the easier position in minors. Its best he still has the ss skills. Playing ss well will make 2b easier.
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Bingo.Francis Park Thug wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:20 pmYep, the same 10 people responding, day after day, after day. They love to gang up. It makes them feel tough. We know their type.billybaseball wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 07:42 amThe people who jump on every posts that Shady posts are far worst than Shady's excessive and repetitive posting for sure. Why can't people just ignore stuff if they don't like it? Attacking someone for posting on a sports forum is pretty pathetic imo
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
I mean theres never a need for wetherholt to play 3b though. They could always play wetherholt at 2b while shifting the other 2b to 3b.Shady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:24 pmThat should read, "It wouldn't be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either". Minus Arenado, 3B seems more "up in the air" than 2B. Of course, hitting is essential. And it's ideal to have some power at 3B. Arm strength/throwing ability may also be factors.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:16 pmThey could to up his utility but its not necessarily needed if they dont want to overwhelm him learning positions and hitting. Gorman or donovan could always move to 3b while he stays at 2b since thats their original position and saggese or fermin or whoever is still here could also move to 3b so theres no real need. None of those guys are great at ss so it makes sense to keep his defense up as the backup ssShady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:56 pmIt would be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:30 pmTrue its not exact same which is why he is getting a few starts there as well although majority have been at ss.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:53 amgenerally agree with this, but no reason not to play both. the turn for the DP is way different for 2bmen, and having played both, I found the throw to 1st strange.. just a wierd body angle... but maybe I'm just wierd lol I did don the tools/gear of ignorance for several yearsWattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:40 amWetherholt had already played 2b 17 times this year. This ismt a sudden change.
And if you can play ss you can play 2b. Ss is just harder. And wetherholt will continue to get most his starts there in minors. Cuz even once he arrives, they can shift him to ss if winn is injured since there are no other great options. He also will be the backup ss too. Theres no reason to just have him only playing the easier position in minors. Its best he still has the ss skills. Playing ss well will make 2b easier.
Donovan originally was a 3b and outfielder in college. Gorman was a 3b. Theres not necessarily a need to get wetherholt to 3b cuz they could always shift the other 2b to 3b instead while wetherholt plays 2b. And doing so would probably be the correct defensive alignment too.
For example if hypothetically wetherholt is up here and arenado is injured. Donovan should shift to 3b while wetherholt plays 2b instead of wetherholt playing 3b. Same if gorman is to get a start. There never a need to put wetherholt at 3b while they play 2b. Ythe defense would always be better with wetherholt at 2b and donovan gorman or saggese at 3b instead of vice versa
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
I'm anticipating Saggese entering the equation. Then, who has the better arm needed at 3B? Gorman, Saggese or Wetherholt.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:31 pmI mean theres never a need for wetherholt to play 3b though. They could always play wetherholt at 2b while shifting the other 2b to 3b.Shady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:24 pmThat should read, "It wouldn't be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either". Minus Arenado, 3B seems more "up in the air" than 2B. Of course, hitting is essential. And it's ideal to have some power at 3B. Arm strength/throwing ability may also be factors.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:16 pmThey could to up his utility but its not necessarily needed if they dont want to overwhelm him learning positions and hitting. Gorman or donovan could always move to 3b while he stays at 2b since thats their original position and saggese or fermin or whoever is still here could also move to 3b so theres no real need. None of those guys are great at ss so it makes sense to keep his defense up as the backup ssShady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:56 pmIt would be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:30 pmTrue its not exact same which is why he is getting a few starts there as well although majority have been at ss.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:53 amgenerally agree with this, but no reason not to play both. the turn for the DP is way different for 2bmen, and having played both, I found the throw to 1st strange.. just a wierd body angle... but maybe I'm just wierd lol I did don the tools/gear of ignorance for several yearsWattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:40 amWetherholt had already played 2b 17 times this year. This ismt a sudden change.
And if you can play ss you can play 2b. Ss is just harder. And wetherholt will continue to get most his starts there in minors. Cuz even once he arrives, they can shift him to ss if winn is injured since there are no other great options. He also will be the backup ss too. Theres no reason to just have him only playing the easier position in minors. Its best he still has the ss skills. Playing ss well will make 2b easier.
Donovan originally was a 3b and outfielder in college. Gorman was a 3b. Theres not necessarily a need to get wetherholt to 3b cuz they could always shift the other 2b to 3b instead while wetherholt plays 2b. And doing so would probably be the correct defensive alignment too.
For example if hypothetically wetherholt is up here and arenado is injured. Donovan should shift to 3b while wetherholt plays 2b instead of wetherholt playing 3b. Same if gorman is to get a start. There never a need to put wetherholt at 3b while they play 2b. Ythe defense would always be better with wetherholt at 2b and donovan gorman or saggese at 3b instead of vice versa
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Regardlessnof arm for 3b, 2b gets more balls and wetherholt is the best 2b. The others gorman and saggese already know 3b so as wetherholt is being rushed up the minors, im fine with them limitjng him to 2b and ss since they can play everyone else at 3b leaving him to 2b. I think him at 2b is the best defensive alignment regardless of arm strengthShady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:36 pmI'm anticipating Saggese entering the equation. Then, who has the better arm needed at 3B? Gorman, Saggese or Wetherholt.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:31 pmI mean theres never a need for wetherholt to play 3b though. They could always play wetherholt at 2b while shifting the other 2b to 3b.Shady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:24 pmThat should read, "It wouldn't be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either". Minus Arenado, 3B seems more "up in the air" than 2B. Of course, hitting is essential. And it's ideal to have some power at 3B. Arm strength/throwing ability may also be factors.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:16 pmThey could to up his utility but its not necessarily needed if they dont want to overwhelm him learning positions and hitting. Gorman or donovan could always move to 3b while he stays at 2b since thats their original position and saggese or fermin or whoever is still here could also move to 3b so theres no real need. None of those guys are great at ss so it makes sense to keep his defense up as the backup ssShady wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:56 pmIt would be a bad idea to get Wetherholt some starts at 3B for Memphis either.Wattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:30 pmTrue its not exact same which is why he is getting a few starts there as well although majority have been at ss.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:53 amgenerally agree with this, but no reason not to play both. the turn for the DP is way different for 2bmen, and having played both, I found the throw to 1st strange.. just a wierd body angle... but maybe I'm just wierd lol I did don the tools/gear of ignorance for several yearsWattage wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:40 amWetherholt had already played 2b 17 times this year. This ismt a sudden change.
And if you can play ss you can play 2b. Ss is just harder. And wetherholt will continue to get most his starts there in minors. Cuz even once he arrives, they can shift him to ss if winn is injured since there are no other great options. He also will be the backup ss too. Theres no reason to just have him only playing the easier position in minors. Its best he still has the ss skills. Playing ss well will make 2b easier.
Donovan originally was a 3b and outfielder in college. Gorman was a 3b. Theres not necessarily a need to get wetherholt to 3b cuz they could always shift the other 2b to 3b instead while wetherholt plays 2b. And doing so would probably be the correct defensive alignment too.
For example if hypothetically wetherholt is up here and arenado is injured. Donovan should shift to 3b while wetherholt plays 2b instead of wetherholt playing 3b. Same if gorman is to get a start. There never a need to put wetherholt at 3b while they play 2b. Ythe defense would always be better with wetherholt at 2b and donovan gorman or saggese at 3b instead of vice versa
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
It’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Strange, the only inputs from “ElliotG” seem to be to defend Shady and bump his threads…almost as if he’s Shady himself??ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:02 pmIt’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 7778
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
I call em as I see emElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:02 pmIt’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.

Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
It's a dog eat dog world, Sammy, and I'm wearing Milkbone underwear.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 16:03 pmI call em as I see emElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:02 pmIt’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.![]()
Norm!
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
he's back at shortstop tonight
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Just let the kid relax and play!
He’s hot with the bat. Make him comfortable.
If he can handle SS he can certainly handle 2B/3B.
Should we really be stressing over what position he plays next season?
He’s hot with the bat. Make him comfortable.
If he can handle SS he can certainly handle 2B/3B.
Should we really be stressing over what position he plays next season?
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
Clicked on this thread hoping for actual baseball talk, not another middle school roast session on Shady. You don’t have to agree with the guy, but the constant pile-on every time he posts is getting old. If you’re more focused on mocking someone than discussing the team, maybe you’re the one wasting space here.
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
So by your logic, then I should assume you are Scouty, right loser?CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:39 pmStrange, the only inputs from “ElliotG” seem to be to defend Shady and bump his threads…almost as if he’s Shady himself??ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:02 pmIt’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: Wetherholt at second base tonite.
(bleep) off Shady. See, if I was Scouty, I’d tell you to F off.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 19:27 pmSo by your logic, then I should assume you are Scouty, right loser?CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:39 pmStrange, the only inputs from “ElliotG” seem to be to defend Shady and bump his threads…almost as if he’s Shady himself??ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 15:02 pmIt’s not an opinion when you acknowledge that what I said is true. You feel ridiculing and mocking of anyone is fine.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 11:54 amThat's your opinion. I have mine. That's what you get on a public forum.ElliottG wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 10:37 amNo, I’m fully aware that the web is full of pathetic losers like yourself. It’s sad that you justify your behavior because there are others who act as idiotic as yourself.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 22:51 pmYes. You post, you run the gauntlet of peoples opinions.ElliottG wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:14 pmIf you think he has the emotional age of a 4 year old, then why are you continually mocking and ridiculing him? Is this how you would treat a child or a person with a disability? For goodness sakes, he’s a huge Cardinal Fan, is that such a sin? If you really think his posts are beneath you, THEN WHY CAN’T YOU JUST IGNORE HIM?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 17:28 pmAll of the ones he posts
What do you think his emotional age is? 4 or lower
Are you new to the interwebs.
Can't deal, then find somewhere safer or where they share your same opinions so it's like talking to yourself. You'll feel much better.