Re: Fedde DFAd
Posted: 23 Jul 2025 12:41 pm
I know dude. I insisted they trade him for Gilbert. They ignored the hell out of us.

STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1514706
I know dude. I insisted they trade him for Gilbert. They ignored the hell out of us.
You could be right. I don't know. I do know that after the trade, especially when Edman was going on his heater with LA and Fedde had a lot of people complaining that the league figured him out, his performance with the White Sox was a fluke and he'd come back to earth. If posters around here thought that, I'm sure there were a few teams with the same thoughts as well.
I agree. It was a good trade at the time. Edman was hurt all year. We desperately needed pitching and a RH bat, and we ended up getting both out of the deal.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:00 pmIt's almost like new information came to light and folks changed their mind. Shocker.
And while I'm glad to be done with him, it was still a good trade...at the time it was made. Tommy was getting expensive relative to his production, and hadn't set foot in a major league stadium at all last season.
I won't fault Mozo for making that trade. But I will absolutely fault him for running with failure for way too long.
We got two guys who are so-so but at least they filled needs! Until one was cut a few weeks later because he actually does suck. And the other couldn't last one full season because he also actually sucks.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 13:02 pmI agree. It was a good trade at the time. Edman was hurt all year. We desperately needed pitching and a RH bat, and we ended up getting both out of the deal.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:00 pmIt's almost like new information came to light and folks changed their mind. Shocker.
And while I'm glad to be done with him, it was still a good trade...at the time it was made. Tommy was getting expensive relative to his production, and hadn't set foot in a major league stadium at all last season.
I won't fault Mozo for making that trade. But I will absolutely fault him for running with failure for way too long.
You could say that he should have not tried to compete that year and tried to see if he could've gotten a good prospect out of the deal instead of Fedde and Pham, but who knows if the move still goes through if that's the ask.
^^this^^
Not everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.![]()
I wasn't thrilled either, quite the opposite.Stlcardsblues wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 13:17 pmNot everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.![]()
Edman on this team would be creating even more of a logjam... not sure how you can say he'd be a serious upgrade over either Scott, Gorman or Saggese, whose PT he'd be taking... maybe Saggese but only defensively.Jobu's Rum wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:31 am
I still wouldn't mind having Edman on this team, would be a nice CF platoon with Scott hitting LHP. I know he cooled but the team would still be better.
Same here. Mel said keeping him and Helsley was easy obvious and correct though said cards could win and their trade value would be higher at the deadline lol
I always felt he was underrated here and was a fan of his. With that said I understood dealing him as he was out and we had similar pieces, just had major concerns on Fedde. I am big on track records and Fedde lacked a consistent one.82birds wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 13:20 pmI wasn't thrilled either, quite the opposite.Stlcardsblues wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 13:17 pmNot everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.![]()
I was a Tommy Edman fan.
So he writes him a check to lose games or a check to not lose games….
That's most of the reality.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:26 pmNobody is saying that. He was an inexpensive risk. If he pitches close to what he had done, he's a steal. At worst, he is a limited risk. He flames out and you have only 3M left and no years left. Thats enough to toss a mid level team prospect and maybe a lottery ticket at.AnExParrot wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:16 pmYou see brock here knows more than the other 29 GMs/POBOs in MLB - those guys had no idea, not even an inkling that Fedde was what brock saw, so we would have got a straight up HAUL of prospects.
![]()