brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
I know dude. I insisted they trade him for Gilbert. They ignored the hell out of us.
Bomber1 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:46 amThat’s a crock.
After the year he had and his salary I guarantee some teams asked about him.
But our POBO is far too smart to let him go for less than he thought Fedde was worth.
Which turns out to be nothing.
You could be right. I don't know. I do know that after the trade, especially when Edman was going on his heater with LA and Fedde had a lot of people complaining that the league figured him out, his performance with the White Sox was a fluke and he'd come back to earth. If posters around here thought that, I'm sure there were a few teams with the same thoughts as well.
Strummer Jones wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:00 pmIt's almost like new information came to light and folks changed their mind. Shocker.
And while I'm glad to be done with him, it was still a good trade...at the time it was made. Tommy was getting expensive relative to his production, and hadn't set foot in a major league stadium at all last season.
I won't fault Mozo for making that trade. But I will absolutely fault him for running with failure for way too long.
I agree. It was a good trade at the time. Edman was hurt all year. We desperately needed pitching and a RH bat, and we ended up getting both out of the deal.
You could say that he should have not tried to compete that year and tried to see if he could've gotten a good prospect out of the deal instead of Fedde and Pham, but who knows if the move still goes through if that's the ask.
Strummer Jones wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 12:00 pmIt's almost like new information came to light and folks changed their mind. Shocker.
And while I'm glad to be done with him, it was still a good trade...at the time it was made. Tommy was getting expensive relative to his production, and hadn't set foot in a major league stadium at all last season.
I won't fault Mozo for making that trade. But I will absolutely fault him for running with failure for way too long.
I agree. It was a good trade at the time. Edman was hurt all year. We desperately needed pitching and a RH bat, and we ended up getting both out of the deal.
You could say that he should have not tried to compete that year and tried to see if he could've gotten a good prospect out of the deal instead of Fedde and Pham, but who knows if the move still goes through if that's the ask.
We got two guys who are so-so but at least they filled needs! Until one was cut a few weeks later because he actually does suck. And the other couldn't last one full season because he also actually sucks.
brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
^^this^^
Is Bill DeWitt the only one who doesn't know this?
Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am
I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.
Not everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.
Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am
I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.
Not everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.
I wasn't thrilled either, quite the opposite.
I was a Tommy Edman fan.
brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
^^this^^
Is Bill DeWitt the only one who doesn't know this?
Your criteria--and mine--for what constitutes an effective GM and DeWitt's are quite different.
Futuregm2 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:29 am
We DFA’d 3 players that we got from trades last year. Yet you also look at Edman (.204 avg/.575 OPS over his last 183 PAs) and Carlson (.618 OPS last year with TB and .650 OPS with Baltimore this year) and realize why.
I still wouldn't mind having Edman on this team, would be a nice CF platoon with Scott hitting LHP. I know he cooled but the team would still be better.
Edman on this team would be creating even more of a logjam... not sure how you can say he'd be a serious upgrade over either Scott, Gorman or Saggese, whose PT he'd be taking... maybe Saggese but only defensively.
brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
Same here. Mel said keeping him and Helsley was easy obvious and correct though said cards could win and their trade value would be higher at the deadline lol
Red Bird Classic wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:55 am
I remember well how many here were thrilled to trade Tommy for Fedde.
Now everyone is excited to be rid of him.
Not everyone was thrilled. I wasn’t a fan of the trade. When he was with Chicago I warned to be careful getting excited as the league hadn’t had a real chance to adjust to the changes he made in Asia. I warned that when they did, he would be another Mikolas.
I wasn't thrilled either, quite the opposite.
I was a Tommy Edman fan.
I always felt he was underrated here and was a fan of his. With that said I understood dealing him as he was out and we had similar pieces, just had major concerns on Fedde. I am big on track records and Fedde lacked a consistent one.
brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
^^this^^
Is Bill DeWitt the only one who doesn't know this?
Your criteria--and mine--for what constitutes an effective GM and DeWitt's are quite different.
brock118 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2025 11:24 am
I screamed from the top of my lungs to trade this fool's gold in the offseason. There was a huge back and forth. Mo does what Mo does best, now we will get nothing for him. Mo sucking at being GM proven once again.
What did you think they would get for him in a trade?
You see brock here knows more than the other 29 GMs/POBOs in MLB - those guys had no idea, not even an inkling that Fedde was what brock saw, so we would have got a straight up HAUL of prospects.
Nobody is saying that. He was an inexpensive risk. If he pitches close to what he had done, he's a steal. At worst, he is a limited risk. He flames out and you have only 3M left and no years left. Thats enough to toss a mid level team prospect and maybe a lottery ticket at.
That's most of the reality.
The Cards are extremely thin with SP. There's McGreevy, Matz, then a couple others and it's not like Libs, Pallante, or Miles
are some absolute knowns quantities. They have also been extremely fortunate to this point with health. Extremely.
Fedde, even with the hindsight POV, brought developmental time to the organization for those pitchers. He looks less valuable
now because he wasn't needed so much when no injuries occurred. He was probably going to be gone in a week anyway.
The miss with Fedde is whatever prospect he'd bring back a maybe something vs nothing.