Salary cap has nothing to do with it?Red7 wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 17:33 pmSure, the Oilers won without Gretzky, but they replaced his production with Klima and Joe Murphy. The Wings won with HOFers like Federov, Hull, Shanahan, Haskell. The Penguins replaced Lemieux with Sidney Crosby. It matters who the replacements are.DawgDad wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 17:13 pmALL players are replaceable, in time. Edmonton won a Cup without Gretzky, Detroit won several without Howe, Pittsburgh won without Lemieux, Chicago won without Mikita, Montreal won without LaFleur, etc.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 13:33 pm I wonder if it has occurred to Army yet that he let the one player go that he can never replace -- BECAUSE HIS TEAM WINS MORE MEANINGLESS GAMES IN MARCH AND APRIL THAN EVERY OTHER NHL TEAM.
And if you think that the replacing a RHD is impossibly costly, just wait until you see how hard it will ultimately be to find a 2C. Anybody remember the Kevin Hayes debacle?
Do you not realize how ridiculous your post is?
Also, for those who mentioned Faulk and Kyrou having NMCs, that's wrong.
As for Avs in 2021-22, Blues gave them as much fight as anyone. Avs went 16-4 in the PLAYOFFS! That pace in a regular season would be 134 points.
Lastly, Blues didn't "let Petro go." He was under no contract and opted for a new team. No fault on either side; two sides unable to agree to. business deal. Good grief.