Re: Cubs overrrated
Posted: 29 Jun 2025 08:24 am
I wonder if "Cards overrated" heads the Cubs Forum posts.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1513679
I'd be willing to bet he's way batter than Mikolas11WSChamps wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025 15:48 pmWe don't know how good or not so good McGreevy is going to be.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:14 pmMcGreevy would've taken one spot, he's a s good or better than Pallante, Mikolas and Fedde.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:10 pmI guarantee you if we had loss that many starters in the rotation we'd be a lot worse off.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 10:16 amAnd the Cardinals have lost I. Hererra, their best hitter.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 09:43 am They have also lost two starting pitchers to injury and against the "good " teams that's going to matter.
Cardinals haven't had to deal with that thank goodness.
Injuries happen to all teams 11WSC.
Let see what the scrubbies look like if they lost Tucker or Crow-Armstrong.
His peripherals don't play as far as I'm concerned for more than a back end starter.
Comparing those pitchers to Tucker or Crow-Armstrong is ridiculous.
If the Cardinals had lost that many rotation starts with three starters the season would be over.
Since, say, the 2000 season how many MLB seasons were there in which that^ wasn't true?AtillaTheBlue1 wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 15:55 pm MLB is not good
Another year of bad baseball and mediocrity.
Last year Cardinals should of been 30-40 under, instead because of how bad the league was, they could of gone on a couple runs and got to .500.This year same stuff, bad baseball, and the bad teams arent much worse than the middling 5-10 games over teams.
obviously rockies n such are the lowest of the low, but you have 20 mediocre to below average teams, cardinals included
I didn't mention it because the conversation had turned into loss of positional players vs. starting pitching.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 08:46 amI'd be willing to bet he's way batter than Mikolas11WSChamps wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025 15:48 pmWe don't know how good or not so good McGreevy is going to be.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:14 pmMcGreevy would've taken one spot, he's a s good or better than Pallante, Mikolas and Fedde.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:10 pmI guarantee you if we had loss that many starters in the rotation we'd be a lot worse off.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 10:16 amAnd the Cardinals have lost I. Hererra, their best hitter.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 09:43 am They have also lost two starting pitchers to injury and against the "good " teams that's going to matter.
Cardinals haven't had to deal with that thank goodness.
Injuries happen to all teams 11WSC.
Let see what the scrubbies look like if they lost Tucker or Crow-Armstrong.
His peripherals don't play as far as I'm concerned for more than a back end starter.
Comparing those pitchers to Tucker or Crow-Armstrong is ridiculous.
If the Cardinals had lost that many rotation starts with three starters the season would be over.![]()
You also fail to mention how much more the scrubbies are spending on payroll too.
We'll never know, all just speculation.11WSChamps wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:45 amI didn't mention it because the conversation had turned into loss of positional players vs. starting pitching.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 08:46 amI'd be willing to bet he's way batter than Mikolas11WSChamps wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025 15:48 pmWe don't know how good or not so good McGreevy is going to be.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:14 pmMcGreevy would've taken one spot, he's a s good or better than Pallante, Mikolas and Fedde.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:10 pmI guarantee you if we had loss that many starters in the rotation we'd be a lot worse off.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 10:16 amAnd the Cardinals have lost I. Hererra, their best hitter.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 09:43 am They have also lost two starting pitchers to injury and against the "good " teams that's going to matter.
Cardinals haven't had to deal with that thank goodness.
Injuries happen to all teams 11WSC.
Let see what the scrubbies look like if they lost Tucker or Crow-Armstrong.
His peripherals don't play as far as I'm concerned for more than a back end starter.
Comparing those pitchers to Tucker or Crow-Armstrong is ridiculous.
If the Cardinals had lost that many rotation starts with three starters the season would be over.![]()
You also fail to mention how much more the scrubbies are spending on payroll too.
I'm not arguing about how the good the Cubs are or aren't my point had to do with the two teams and how the Cardinals would fare if they had loss as many rotation starters as the Cubs especially since the Cardinals have played arguably a tougher schedule to date.
If you want to throw in payroll than yeah the Cardinals are right there just a handful of games back.
Perhaps.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:47 amWe'll never know, all just speculation.11WSChamps wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:45 amI didn't mention it because the conversation had turned into loss of positional players vs. starting pitching.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 08:46 amI'd be willing to bet he's way batter than Mikolas11WSChamps wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025 15:48 pmWe don't know how good or not so good McGreevy is going to be.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:14 pmMcGreevy would've taken one spot, he's a s good or better than Pallante, Mikolas and Fedde.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:10 pmI guarantee you if we had loss that many starters in the rotation we'd be a lot worse off.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 10:16 amAnd the Cardinals have lost I. Hererra, their best hitter.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 09:43 am They have also lost two starting pitchers to injury and against the "good " teams that's going to matter.
Cardinals haven't had to deal with that thank goodness.
Injuries happen to all teams 11WSC.
Let see what the scrubbies look like if they lost Tucker or Crow-Armstrong.
His peripherals don't play as far as I'm concerned for more than a back end starter.
Comparing those pitchers to Tucker or Crow-Armstrong is ridiculous.
If the Cardinals had lost that many rotation starts with three starters the season would be over.![]()
You also fail to mention how much more the scrubbies are spending on payroll too.
I'm not arguing about how the good the Cubs are or aren't my point had to do with the two teams and how the Cardinals would fare if they had loss as many rotation starters as the Cubs especially since the Cardinals have played arguably a tougher schedule to date.
If you want to throw in payroll than yeah the Cardinals are right there just a handful of games back.
As long as it's not Gray or Libby they'd be fine since McG can give them more than they're getting from Mikolas and Pallante, perhaps from Fedde too.11WSChamps wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:48 amPerhaps.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:47 amWe'll never know, all just speculation.11WSChamps wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 10:45 amI didn't mention it because the conversation had turned into loss of positional players vs. starting pitching.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 08:46 amI'd be willing to bet he's way batter than Mikolas11WSChamps wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025 15:48 pmWe don't know how good or not so good McGreevy is going to be.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:14 pmMcGreevy would've taken one spot, he's a s good or better than Pallante, Mikolas and Fedde.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 14:10 pmI guarantee you if we had loss that many starters in the rotation we'd be a lot worse off.rockondlouie wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 10:16 amAnd the Cardinals have lost I. Hererra, their best hitter.11WSChamps wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025 09:43 am They have also lost two starting pitchers to injury and against the "good " teams that's going to matter.
Cardinals haven't had to deal with that thank goodness.
Injuries happen to all teams 11WSC.
Let see what the scrubbies look like if they lost Tucker or Crow-Armstrong.
His peripherals don't play as far as I'm concerned for more than a back end starter.
Comparing those pitchers to Tucker or Crow-Armstrong is ridiculous.
If the Cardinals had lost that many rotation starts with three starters the season would be over.![]()
You also fail to mention how much more the scrubbies are spending on payroll too.
I'm not arguing about how the good the Cubs are or aren't my point had to do with the two teams and how the Cardinals would fare if they had loss as many rotation starters as the Cubs especially since the Cardinals have played arguably a tougher schedule to date.
If you want to throw in payroll than yeah the Cardinals are right there just a handful of games back.
Hopefully the Cardinals don't lose any starting pitchers to injury so we don't find out.