Page 4 of 4

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 17:42 pm
by Futuregm2
Yankees just went back to back to back to start the game vs Kyle Gibson. Grisham, Judge, Rice. And Bellinger makes it 4 HRs in the first for the Yankees vs Gibson. Batting Practice.

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 17:45 pm
by Shady
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:33 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:46 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:45 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:42 pm
craviduce wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:40 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:53 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:50 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:31 pm
Futuregm2 wrote: 29 Apr 2025 14:57 pm Cardinals are surprisingly the highest SLG% team in baseball from the 5th spot with a .518 SLG% (1st by 50 points!), but get this...

It's literately based off of 3 players

Herrera: 8 PA (1.714 SLG%...on IL)
Contreras: 4 PA (1.500 SLG%...now hitting 5th)
Donovan: 12 PA (.917...usually hitting 3rd)

The rest:
Burleson: 67 PA (.355 SLG%)
Gorman: 16 PA (.308 SLG%)
Baker: 9 PA (.286 SLG%)
Walker: 5 PA (.200 SLG%)
Pages: 2 PA (.000 SLG%)

Fwiw, the .355 SLG% by Burleson would rank 16th in baseball by teams. 8O 8O 8O The fact that it's basically average is very sad. 5 teams, including the Dodgers, have a sub .300 SLG% from the 5th spot.
That's why he's now batting 6th. Just curious, how does Arenado's SLG% rate as a cleanup hitter?
.431. Are you too lazy to look things up yourself or simply too mentally deficient?
no....he's just doing his usual deflection, trying to put the blame on Arenado (I don't understand that one, he's been productive, Burleson hasn't.) or Contreras. He trolls so hard to get people to not look at the Golden Coral Garbage Dump in Burleson.

And the 5 Singles he had recently were seeing eye singles....hits nonetheless, but not what you want from your 5 hitter.
Guru, Your Honor. Arenado makes enormous "big bucks". Burleson makes "peanuts", MLB salary-wise. Please try to comprehend the salary/production expectations.
More Name Calling :roll: Do we need to revisit OregonRedbird's post on Name Calling? You made a big-to-do about it, and yet here you are calling people names. What would Cranny thinK?

And...no one tries to comprehend anything you say/declare/compare...unless it has 8 edits.
Does referring to another poster by their name count? Chill Guru !
Since when is calling someone by their first name considered "name calling"?
Not cool on an anonymous message board. OK, Richard?
Says who? Is that in the CT constitution? And how would anyone know your first name? I guarantee you'll never learn my name!
My sources tell me your name is Richard Head. I'm done with you, man. You just try too hard to cause trouble. You have a miserable attitude. Have a good life.

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 17:48 pm
by Futuregm2
Yankees pouring on 6 XBH vs Gibson in the first inning with just 1 out recorded, Goldy. Chisholm adds a triple and Volpe follows with a RBI double.

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 17:57 pm
by scoutyjones2
Absolut wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:41 pm We didn’t lose today on the road.
:lol:

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 18:02 pm
by Mort Gage
Futuregm2 wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:48 pm Yankees pouring on 6 XBH vs Gibson in the first inning with just 1 out recorded, Goldy. Chisholm adds a triple and Volpe follows with a RBI double.
Judge at 33 is better than ever. He could .250 blindfolded.

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 18:44 pm
by cardsfaninla
scoutyjones2 wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:57 pm
Absolut wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:41 pm We didn’t lose today on the road.
:lol:
It might be the only way we can win on the road consistently.

That being said .... stupid weather...

Re: GDT: Cards @ Reds (4/29) ~ 5:40pm CDT

Posted: 29 Apr 2025 19:41 pm
by Monsieur De Treville
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:45 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 17:33 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:46 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:45 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:42 pm
craviduce wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:40 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:53 pm
Monsieur De Treville wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:50 pm
Shady wrote: 29 Apr 2025 15:31 pm
Futuregm2 wrote: 29 Apr 2025 14:57 pm Cardinals are surprisingly the highest SLG% team in baseball from the 5th spot with a .518 SLG% (1st by 50 points!), but get this...

It's literately based off of 3 players

Herrera: 8 PA (1.714 SLG%...on IL)
Contreras: 4 PA (1.500 SLG%...now hitting 5th)
Donovan: 12 PA (.917...usually hitting 3rd)

The rest:
Burleson: 67 PA (.355 SLG%)
Gorman: 16 PA (.308 SLG%)
Baker: 9 PA (.286 SLG%)
Walker: 5 PA (.200 SLG%)
Pages: 2 PA (.000 SLG%)

Fwiw, the .355 SLG% by Burleson would rank 16th in baseball by teams. 8O 8O 8O The fact that it's basically average is very sad. 5 teams, including the Dodgers, have a sub .300 SLG% from the 5th spot.
That's why he's now batting 6th. Just curious, how does Arenado's SLG% rate as a cleanup hitter?
.431. Are you too lazy to look things up yourself or simply too mentally deficient?
no....he's just doing his usual deflection, trying to put the blame on Arenado (I don't understand that one, he's been productive, Burleson hasn't.) or Contreras. He trolls so hard to get people to not look at the Golden Coral Garbage Dump in Burleson.

And the 5 Singles he had recently were seeing eye singles....hits nonetheless, but not what you want from your 5 hitter.
Guru, Your Honor. Arenado makes enormous "big bucks". Burleson makes "peanuts", MLB salary-wise. Please try to comprehend the salary/production expectations.
More Name Calling :roll: Do we need to revisit OregonRedbird's post on Name Calling? You made a big-to-do about it, and yet here you are calling people names. What would Cranny thinK?

And...no one tries to comprehend anything you say/declare/compare...unless it has 8 edits.
Does referring to another poster by their name count? Chill Guru !
Since when is calling someone by their first name considered "name calling"?
Not cool on an anonymous message board. OK, Richard?
Says who? Is that in the CT constitution? And how would anyone know your first name? I guarantee you'll never learn my name!
My sources tell me your name is Richard Head. I'm done with you, man. You just try too hard to cause trouble. You have a miserable attitude. Have a good life.
Four (4) edits to hit me with a junior high insult? That is too funny! Richard Head? That's the best you've got, Marshall?
Pretty pathetic.