GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
If we could find a way to stop scoring on ourselves and make the Jets score I think this would be more interesting. The Suter goal last game and Snuggy tonight are really hurting our momentum when we do have some.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
I don’t get that move honestly. Was Joseph injured? Or maybe a d-man or two are dinged up and Monty wanted insurance on the blue line? Just don’t like going 11 and 7 unless absolutely necessary.JoshInFenton wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:12 pm I can say after this one i wouldn't give Tucker another look unless we have an injured defensemen. He looked allergic to the puck at times, and the pressure of the big stage suddenly looked to swallow him up a few times over. I'd rather Kessel if we are going 7, but honestly just put joseph out there so we don't have to juggle lines so much.
How in the doghouse must Texier be to still not get in? Either way, I hope they go back with the traditional 12 and 6 next game.
Blues lack of depth showing here..
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Both goals tonight Binny was interfered with by his own players
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
the absence of holloway REALLY enforces the blues need for a 2c. not sure if dalibor is ready to be thrown in the deep end, but last two weeks have shown that holloway and kyrou were also having to pull along the corpse of brayden schenn, who has done basically nothing since holloway went out.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Come on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 844
- Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Dylan Holloway is a very good young player, but he’s not the reason it’s 2-0.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Really, now. You know this . . . How?desertrat23 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:23 pmDylan Holloway is a very good young player, but he’s not the reason it’s 2-0.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
I was not whining over the Blues not having Holloway, I was pointing out the one-sided slant in the comment re: the absence of Ehlers and Villardi.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
The Jets lost 7 games in regulation in their building. We went in there and lost 2 games by 1 goal each and scored goals on ourselves in each game.
As someone who consistently said I didn't think they'd make the playoffs...
It's all gravy at this point. Keep letting the kids experience the playoff atmosphere, including Tucker. It'll all be worth it down the road.
As someone who consistently said I didn't think they'd make the playoffs...
It's all gravy at this point. Keep letting the kids experience the playoff atmosphere, including Tucker. It'll all be worth it down the road.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Better than what? Those are my observations.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Parayko interferred with Binner on the Jets second goal. He knocked Binner’s stick away as Binner tried to move the other direction to stop the shot. Both Jets goals were helped by our own players. It’s the only way the Jets could score tonight.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 844
- Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
I know this because I’m looking at the series objectively.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:28 pmReally, now. You know this . . . How?desertrat23 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:23 pmDylan Holloway is a very good young player, but he’s not the reason it’s 2-0.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
I was not whining over the Blues not having Holloway, I was pointing out the one-sided slant in the comment re: the absence of Ehlers and Villardi.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
There is no slant , they are missing two of their top 6 players.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:28 pmReally, now. You know this . . . How?desertrat23 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:23 pmDylan Holloway is a very good young player, but he’s not the reason it’s 2-0.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
I was not whining over the Blues not having Holloway, I was pointing out the one-sided slant in the comment re: the absence of Ehlers and Villardi.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Two theories out there:STL fan in MN wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:17 pmI don’t get that move honestly. Was Joseph injured? Or maybe a d-man or two are dinged up and Monty wanted insurance on the blue line? Just don’t like going 11 and 7 unless absolutely necessary.JoshInFenton wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:12 pm I can say after this one i wouldn't give Tucker another look unless we have an injured defensemen. He looked allergic to the puck at times, and the pressure of the big stage suddenly looked to swallow him up a few times over. I'd rather Kessel if we are going 7, but honestly just put joseph out there so we don't have to juggle lines so much.
How in the doghouse must Texier be to still not get in? Either way, I hope they go back with the traditional 12 and 6 next game.
Blues lack of depth showing here..
The 3rd line wasn't producing much and Monty wanted to get his best players out there as much as possible. This move is also because he could ride Thomas, Kyrou, etc. because there is a 2 day break before game 3.
The other is what someone pointed out on this thread. And that's Parayko is still hurt and they need some insurance on D.
I wasn't opposed to it, but what it shows is how Holloway missing has affected the lines. And that describes the lack of depth the team has. Next year, you can shuffle some players and have Schenn on the 3rd line with hopefully better depth for the first 2 lines.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Montgomery needs to speak to why his teams so constantly have such a dramatic Jekyll and Hyde affect in pressure games.
These last two games specifically have had such a drastic difference between start and finish. They don’t even look like the same team from period one to three.
Don’t tell me it’s endurance. The signs of exhaustion would be obvious. All I’m seeing is a complete quit.
These last two games specifically have had such a drastic difference between start and finish. They don’t even look like the same team from period one to three.
Don’t tell me it’s endurance. The signs of exhaustion would be obvious. All I’m seeing is a complete quit.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
And the Blues are missing one of their top-3. Fair is fair, why point out who they are missing and not the Blues? It's akin to posting how things might be different if the Blues had Holloway and their guys were still out.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:33 pmThere is no slant , they are missing two of their top 6 players.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:28 pmReally, now. You know this . . . How?desertrat23 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:23 pmDylan Holloway is a very good young player, but he’s not the reason it’s 2-0.DawgDad wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:22 pmCome on now, if the Blues had Holloway it might be 2-0 the other way. You're better than that, really.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:14 pm The Jets are good…let’s not act like they aren’t a good team because of past failures. Right now their best players have been better then our best players. You are never in trouble until you lose on home ice, but I’d say the Blues are definitely in trouble. I haven’t seen enough buy in and willing to pay the price for 60 mins. Parayko is terrible right now…no way he should be on the ice with the goalie pulled…puck looked like a live grenade on his stick.
If the Jets had Ehlers and Villardi this is likely a sweep.
Otherwise, they contained Thomas and Kyrou, Blues left Connor alone in the slot. It's not like the Blues are losing 4-1. Line matchups in St. Louis and a bit of crowd adrenaline could tip the scales. We'll see.
I was not whining over the Blues not having Holloway, I was pointing out the one-sided slant in the comment re: the absence of Ehlers and Villardi.
Re: GDT: Blues at Jets 6:30 CBC, TVAS2, ESPN2, FDSNMW
Lol the president's trophy team that plays stifling defense is doing their thing. They are also bigger and physically punishing us. Quitting? HahaWilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025 21:38 pm Montgomery needs to speak to why his teams so constantly have such a dramatic Jekyll and Hyde affect in pressure games.
These last two games specifically have had such a drastic difference between start and finish. They don’t even look like the same team from period one to three.
Don’t tell me it’s endurance. The signs of exhaustion would be obvious. All I’m seeing is a complete quit.