Good idea to get off drugs.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
JJ to the Dodgers.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Cranny
- Forum User
- Posts: 6780
- Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
-
WLTFE
- Forum User
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
+1...solid post...sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
WLTFE
- Forum User
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
WLTFE wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:27 pm+1...solid post...at least you’re not whining about Saggese!sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
greyhawk
- Forum User
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:34 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
agreed, not every post lands...but at least BDog's are originalWLTFE wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:29 pmWLTFE wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:27 pm+1...solid post...at least you’re not whining about Saggese!sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
WLTFE
- Forum User
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
Agreed...too many old turds need to S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]!greyhawk wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:35 pmagreed, not every post lands...but at least BDog's are originalWLTFE wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:29 pmWLTFE wrote: ↑11 May 2026 19:27 pm+1...solid post...at least you’re not whining about Saggese!sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
Thanks for the counsel, Dad.Cranny wrote: ↑11 May 2026 17:50 pmGood idea to get off drugs.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
bccardsfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: 25 May 2024 11:11 am
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
I think there's a scenario where a young player might take a five or six year contract that gets him maybe 80 to 90% of what he's worth. As long as he gets another shot at free agency in his early thirties. The reason would be to get cash now, and more importantly you could blow out a knee or a shoulder, or get a bad back, or any number of things that could end your career early, and the buying out of arbitration years, young player contract gives you some certainty. We're talking about more money than anybody can spend anyway. So as a young player if I could get most of what I thought I would be worth and guarantee myself a lifetime worth of money, and still have a shot at a big free agent deal in my early 30s, I might sign.45s wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:15 amThere is merit in the club pursuing extensions…….but I struggle to understand why any potential star player wouldsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:08 amThanx for the input. Saved me some typing. Yes. The player and reps. Now is the time before he breaks out. Once he gets established the cost goes up is think. And if he garners any league honors, again we get pricier.
A new way of doing business for STL.
Is it a piece of the rebuild.
-
Cranny
- Forum User
- Posts: 6780
- Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
My pleasure, Satch.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑11 May 2026 21:33 pmThanks for the counsel, Dad.Cranny wrote: ↑11 May 2026 17:50 pmGood idea to get off drugs.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 18124
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
Why do you say that sir. I’m a patient in the medical cannabis program. A legal program.Cranny wrote: ↑12 May 2026 07:39 amMy pleasure, Satch.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑11 May 2026 21:33 pmThanks for the counsel, Dad.Cranny wrote: ↑11 May 2026 17:50 pmGood idea to get off drugs.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
I purchase my product from a pharmacy. I am treated for glaucoma and Crohn’s disease with good success.
What difference is it from the Statins you take?
I have a very regimented system of delivery. I take one puff every 30-45 minutes. Never more never sooner.
I smoke 1.5 grams per day, measured, about the equivalent of one joint over 12 hours.
Have you not seen the side effects of regular Crohns treatments. Deadly.
As for the side effect of getting High one puff won’t do it.
-
WLTFE
- Forum User
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm
Re: JJ to the Dodgers.
+1...don't take any [shirt] from the village troll...being judged without knowing all the facts says a great deal about that person...sad...sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑12 May 2026 08:09 amWhy do you say that sir. I’m a patient in the medical cannabis program. A legal program.Cranny wrote: ↑12 May 2026 07:39 amMy pleasure, Satch.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑11 May 2026 21:33 pmThanks for the counsel, Dad.Cranny wrote: ↑11 May 2026 17:50 pmGood idea to get off drugs.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:26 amYea. I hear ya. Silly me. Gotta quit smoking that chit.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑11 May 2026 10:19 amthere is no "timeline" for dodger baseball currently. which is the issue with baseball in general. It's not rebuild, they are always in perpetual reload. The reason it works for them is they have been solid in the drafting/minor leagues so they can constantly make trades and signings with their infinite money because they have prospects that people are willing to deal for. If they could only make signings, things get a little more hairy.
this thread in general is silly. You could make 50-60 of them of the best players not on the dodger roster and speculate if and when.
You make a point i used- Dodgers and recycle. I used a 4-5 year window as a measure of new faces. I was attempting to time it out with a JJ like event.
I’m sure perpetual reload/all young un locked up players are on the Sodgers radar. As you noted-
I purchase my product from a pharmacy. I am treated for glaucoma and Crohn’s disease with good success.
What difference is it from the Statins you take?
I have a very regimented system of delivery. I take one puff every 30-45 minutes. Never more never sooner.
I smoke 1.5 grams per day, measured, about the equivalent of one joint over 12 hours.
Have you not seen the side effects of regular Crohns treatments. Deadly.
As for the side effect of getting High one puff won’t do it.