Page 3 of 5

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 13:17 pm
by craviduce
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 06:10 am As already reported, Bloom was able to receive two Top 100 Picks (#68 & #72) in the upcoming Draft to go along with the #13 pick the wet-fart for a Draft Lottery produced and the #32 pick via Competitive Balance A.

Prior to the deal, the Cardinals had the 8th highest Signing Pool allotment at ~$13.7M.
1 - Tampa Bay Rays: $19,590,500
2 - Pittsburgh Pirates: $18,592,800
3 - Chicago White Sox: $17,090,000
4 - Minnesota Twins: $16,410,400
5 - Kansas City Royals: $15,505,000
6 - Atlanta Braves: $15,415,700
7 - Colorado Rockies: $15,103,600
8 - St. Louis Cardinals: $13,741,900
9 - San Francisco Giants: $13,674,500
10 - Athletics: $13,399,500
For the 2025 Draft, the #68 & #72 Picks added about ~$2.4M to the team’s draft pool; which would move the Cardinals into the Top 5 for Draft Pool Allotment.
68. Brewers: $1,254,400
72. Cardinals: $1,145,900

This means they’ll have almost $2M more to spend on Draft Picks then they had last season when they had the 7th Highest at a combined $14.2M and the #5 Pick (Slotted at $8.1M). Hopefully, the Cardinals will see some high value HS players drop into their loving arms at #13, because they are ripe to take advantage of such good fortunes.
Where the Draft Is Headed Next: Money, Models, and Development
The 2026 MLB Draft is about more than just the players selected. It’s a pivotal moment in how teams build their future. Over-slot bonuses will continue to be a major tool in a team’s arsenal. As teams get better at scouting, data analytics, and player development, the draft will become an even more dynamic part of how organizations approach the long-term build.

The teams that will succeed in 2026 are the ones that balance financial risk with talent evaluation. In the years to come, the draft will continue to evolve, and front offices will have to stay one step ahead of the changes.
Some of you might remember the 2025 Brewers Draft Strategy; which emphasized high-upside, high school talent. They ended up selecting 12 high school players, with a significant chunk of those prep players on Day 2.

The 2025 Brewers had similar Pick Slotting, but far less money allotment (~13.1M). Hopefully, Bloom’s recent investments in Jupiter, funneling cash towards their new Pitching Academy and Player Development, will allow the Cardinals to leverage these compensation picks to acquire loads of high-end HS Talent in the 2026 Draft.

Get those scouts out to the HS Diamonds!
awesome post, BB...I don't like doing this, but I've been preaching/talking about the Brewers unconventional drafting style for the last 2 or 3 seasons. It's chaotic, and it would drive me nuts, but they've doing well with it, while mixing in good hitting, albeit soft on fielding, college players. Couple that strat with their impressive DSL finds....I'm starting to think their developmental strats are the best in the league, or at least rivaling the Dodgers.

anyways, thoroughly enjoyed the read. I'd like a really good college bat with the 13th pick, and then go crazy with high upside Prep Stars....sign who you can...throw as much money as you can at them, too. I don't mind if it's more than what we offer the 13th pick...and I don't mind if we don't sign 5 or 6 players, like the Brewers always fail to do....they do come away with 5 highend, high upside Prep Picks, so it's a win for them anyways.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 13:24 pm
by rockondlouie
ramfandan wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:55 am Bloom just mentioned in his press conference how the Donovan deal would not have happened without the inclusion of the added draft picks.
They were important part of the trade.
I don't know if the average Cardinals fan realizes how important this was, D. Gould said on 101.1 that it was Bloom's strong contacts w/TB that helped make it happen.

That added money is HUGE!

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 15:01 pm
by Ronnie Dobbs
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 amMo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Yes, that is why I think DeWitt has been a great owner overall and that Mo is not as bad as some people around here act like he is. Do you feel the same way? What are you saying, though? Just because it has ONLY been a decade since they really did anything that they should stick with running things how they were? The game passes people by. It passed Walt Jocketty and TLR by. You have to move on.

And look at how things were ran when they did win a lot. They did it with a base of homegrown players (mainly Pujols, let's be honest) that made it possible to bring in free agents and make trades for some guys with higher salaries. Which is exactly what they are trying to get back to. But they are not a team, and have never been a team, that can just throw money at a problem and hope it goes away. They needed to restart and that is what they are doing. And most of the successful teams currently have rebuilt over the years.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 15:47 pm
by Southern Illinois
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:02 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:58 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:52 am Drafting a winning team for profit. The Cardinal Way. On sale at your local Barnes and Noble in the clearance isle. :roll: The true definition of unrealized gains, draft picks. Takes years to get them to the majors and productive (if they ever produce at all) then when they hit arbitration you sell them to a contender and start all over again. Sell the base on this perpetual "rebuilding" and pocket the cash. So smart only a billionaire would do it. :roll: ::crazya::
How much did they win the last decade with the midmarket FA “splurge” strategy?
Well... Cherry picking the time length doesn't look great. They did make the playoffs in 2022 and if not for the blow up of their closer Helsley, they in all almost assuredly would've have won game one. But this model did produce two World champions and numerous playoff games. But you go ahead with your story.

And the draft produced Yadi and Albert, what’s your point? It’s done a myriad of ways, only a moron would pigeonhole a team into one strategy.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 16:41 pm
by CCard
Southern Illinois wrote: 03 Feb 2026 15:47 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:02 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:58 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:52 am Drafting a winning team for profit. The Cardinal Way. On sale at your local Barnes and Noble in the clearance isle. :roll: The true definition of unrealized gains, draft picks. Takes years to get them to the majors and productive (if they ever produce at all) then when they hit arbitration you sell them to a contender and start all over again. Sell the base on this perpetual "rebuilding" and pocket the cash. So smart only a billionaire would do it. :roll: ::crazya::
How much did they win the last decade with the midmarket FA “splurge” strategy?
Well... Cherry picking the time length doesn't look great. They did make the playoffs in 2022 and if not for the blow up of their closer Helsley, they in all almost assuredly would've have won game one. But this model did produce two World champions and numerous playoff games. But you go ahead with your story.

And the draft produced Yadi and Albert, what’s your point? It’s done a myriad of ways, only a moron would pigeonhole a team into one strategy.
You mean like gutting payroll?

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 16:42 pm
by CCard
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 03 Feb 2026 15:01 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 amMo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Yes, that is why I think DeWitt has been a great owner overall and that Mo is not as bad as some people around here act like he is. Do you feel the same way? What are you saying, though? Just because it has ONLY been a decade since they really did anything that they should stick with running things how they were? The game passes people by. It passed Walt Jocketty and TLR by. You have to move on.

And look at how things were ran when they did win a lot. They did it with a base of homegrown players (mainly Pujols, let's be honest) that made it possible to bring in free agents and make trades for some guys with higher salaries. Which is exactly what they are trying to get back to. But they are not a team, and have never been a team, that can just throw money at a problem and hope it goes away. They needed to restart and that is what they are doing. And most of the successful teams currently have rebuilt over the years.
There's no excuse you can make for the payroll being gutted like this. None.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 17:01 pm
by Ronnie Dobbs
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 16:42 pmThere's no excuse you can make for the payroll being gutted like this. None.
Yes there is. It’s how every other rebuild in MLB has been done.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 17:08 pm
by imyourhuckleberry
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:23 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:02 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:58 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:52 am Drafting a winning team for profit. The Cardinal Way. On sale at your local Barnes and Noble in the clearance isle. :roll: The true definition of unrealized gains, draft picks. Takes years to get them to the majors and productive (if they ever produce at all) then when they hit arbitration you sell them to a contender and start all over again. Sell the base on this perpetual "rebuilding" and pocket the cash. So smart only a billionaire would do it. :roll: ::crazya::
How much did they win the last decade with the midmarket FA “splurge” strategy?
Well... Cherry picking the time length doesn't look great. They did make the playoffs in 2022 and if not for the blow up of their closer Helsley, they in all almost assuredly would've have won game one. But this model did produce two World champions and numerous playoff games. But you go ahead with your story.
Cherry-picking? A decade isn’t cherry-picking. It’s an era
Mo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Most of the success prior to the last decade was centered around an all-world, once-in-a-generation player who was drafted and developed, a future HoF catcher who was also drafted and developed, a reclamation project FA pitcher who didn't even pitch for them the first year, another pitcher acquired as a minor leaguer, a CF acquired in his prime by having the minor league depth to be able to trade and a multi time all-star 3B who was also acquired because they had the minor league pieces needed to acquire him.

So, basically, they built a consistent winner by drafting and developing elite talent, acquiring minor league talent to develop and use in trades, trading for elite talent with accumulated minor league depth and some free agents to fill in the missing pieces. Does that sound like a familiar plan?

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 21:07 pm
by CCard
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 03 Feb 2026 17:08 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:23 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 08:02 am
BleedingBleu wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:58 am
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 07:52 am Drafting a winning team for profit. The Cardinal Way. On sale at your local Barnes and Noble in the clearance isle. :roll: The true definition of unrealized gains, draft picks. Takes years to get them to the majors and productive (if they ever produce at all) then when they hit arbitration you sell them to a contender and start all over again. Sell the base on this perpetual "rebuilding" and pocket the cash. So smart only a billionaire would do it. :roll: ::crazya::
How much did they win the last decade with the midmarket FA “splurge” strategy?
Well... Cherry picking the time length doesn't look great. They did make the playoffs in 2022 and if not for the blow up of their closer Helsley, they in all almost assuredly would've have won game one. But this model did produce two World champions and numerous playoff games. But you go ahead with your story.
Cherry-picking? A decade isn’t cherry-picking. It’s an era
Mo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Most of the success prior to the last decade was centered around an all-world, once-in-a-generation player who was drafted and developed, a future HoF catcher who was also drafted and developed, a reclamation project FA pitcher who didn't even pitch for them the first year, another pitcher acquired as a minor leaguer, a CF acquired in his prime by having the minor league depth to be able to trade and a multi time all-star 3B who was also acquired because they had the minor league pieces needed to acquire him.

So, basically, they built a consistent winner by drafting and developing elite talent, acquiring minor league talent to develop and use in trades, trading for elite talent with accumulated minor league depth and some free agents to fill in the missing pieces. Does that sound like a familiar plan?
You might have missed the part where they had to pay that talent. And still, right or wrong, they let Pujols (your once in a generation talent) walk. Over pocket change. All those others had to be paid. They didn't gut the team when they lost. Imagine that, you proved my point for me. Thank you.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 21:08 pm
by CCard
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 03 Feb 2026 17:01 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 16:42 pmThere's no excuse you can make for the payroll being gutted like this. None.
Yes there is. It’s how every other rebuild in MLB has been done.
Nearly two decades the Cards didn't do it and they were one of the most successful teams in MLB. So no, they don't have to do it and most teams don't tank. Some though are perpetual tankers.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 21:27 pm
by greyhawk
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 16:42 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 03 Feb 2026 15:01 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 amMo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Yes, that is why I think DeWitt has been a great owner overall and that Mo is not as bad as some people around here act like he is. Do you feel the same way? What are you saying, though? Just because it has ONLY been a decade since they really did anything that they should stick with running things how they were? The game passes people by. It passed Walt Jocketty and TLR by. You have to move on.

And look at how things were ran when they did win a lot. They did it with a base of homegrown players (mainly Pujols, let's be honest) that made it possible to bring in free agents and make trades for some guys with higher salaries. Which is exactly what they are trying to get back to. But they are not a team, and have never been a team, that can just throw money at a problem and hope it goes away. They needed to restart and that is what they are doing. And most of the successful teams currently have rebuilt over the years.
There's no excuse you can make for the payroll being gutted like this. None.
which of the players traded were going to help win another championship?

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 21:28 pm
by greyhawk
ScotchMIrish wrote: 03 Feb 2026 09:58 am Are there any ambidextrous pitchers available?
no just amphibious ones..... :)

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 21:42 pm
by butsir01
greyhawk wrote: 03 Feb 2026 21:28 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 03 Feb 2026 09:58 am Are there any ambidextrous pitchers available?
no just amphibious ones..... :)
Ambihandsterous

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 22:05 pm
by Bushiro
Obviously I wish we were looking at a 95 to a 100 win team... and a piece away from being a world series contender...other than adding a bunch of pieces that we don't yet know how they will turn out...but I understand the rebuild and I'm looking forward to seeing how these young guys come along...It definitely has been a couple completely different decades for sure...it was awesome from my mid to late 20s to my late 30s...tons of playoff baseball...a few championships....good memories watching those games with family and friends...and then it's been been not so good in my 40s...I'll be out somewhere with my cards shirt or hat on... and someone is always saying something... like what happened to them...what are they doing...and of course my cub friends rubbing it in how pathetic they are...but now I'm 50 almost 51...and I think this rebuild is going to kickoff a nice decade of Cardinal baseball

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 22:06 pm
by Melville
rockondlouie wrote: 03 Feb 2026 13:24 pm
ramfandan wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:55 am Bloom just mentioned in his press conference how the Donovan deal would not have happened without the inclusion of the added draft picks.
They were important part of the trade.
I don't know if the average Cardinals fan realizes how important this was, D. Gould said on 101.1 that it was Bloom's strong contacts w/TB that helped make it happen.

That added money is HUGE!
No, it really isn't.
Look at the results of the 2020 MLB draft, nearly 6 years ago, as an example.
Of the top 100 picks, exactly 3 have appeared in an MLB all-star game.
Crochet (#11)
Crow-Armstrong (#19)
Westburg (#30)
At least 1/3 of those 100 picks have never made it to MLB or have already arrived and been released.
Another 1/3 or more will never have productive MLB careers.
That's simply the reality of how MLB drafts work.
Let's look at some names STL fans should be familiar with.
Walker (#21) and currently struggling to stay in MLB.
Winn (#54) is very good MLB defensive SS.
Hence (#63) complete waste of a pick so far.
Burleson (#70) starting 1b with slightly below average production for the position but remaining upside.
Prater (#93) out of organized baseball
Roby (#86) never reached MLB, averaged 13 appearances per minor league season, currently out with TJ surgery until sometime in2027.
Jordan (#89) reached AAA in 2025.
7 of the top 89 picks were selected or later acquired by STL.
Exactly 2 of those 7 (Winn, Burleson) look like MLB starting players - and one of those 2 was a complete surprise to the Cardinals.
3 are huge question marks 5+ years later and the odds of success as a solid starting MLB player at this point are strongly against them.
2 are either out of baseball or derailed by multiple injuries.
For the Cardinals, that is a 29% success rate at finding a solid MLB starting player and a 0% success rate at finding a star player, from among the first 89 picks - and the 2020 draft was considered an unusually strong one for them.
And an added couple of million dollars would not have changed that one bit.
FACT is, the draft is, at best, a complete crapshoot every year outside of the top dozen or so picks.

Re: Comp Picks Alters 2026 Draft Strategy, Dramatically

Posted: 03 Feb 2026 22:08 pm
by Melville
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 16:42 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 03 Feb 2026 15:01 pm
CCard wrote: 03 Feb 2026 11:26 amMo was around longer than a decade. Dewitt has owned the team longer than a decade. A decade is only an increment of time. Funny how people will cherry pick an increment and infer a conclusion based on it. It's not honest though.
Yes, that is why I think DeWitt has been a great owner overall and that Mo is not as bad as some people around here act like he is. Do you feel the same way? What are you saying, though? Just because it has ONLY been a decade since they really did anything that they should stick with running things how they were? The game passes people by. It passed Walt Jocketty and TLR by. You have to move on.

And look at how things were ran when they did win a lot. They did it with a base of homegrown players (mainly Pujols, let's be honest) that made it possible to bring in free agents and make trades for some guys with higher salaries. Which is exactly what they are trying to get back to. But they are not a team, and have never been a team, that can just throw money at a problem and hope it goes away. They needed to restart and that is what they are doing. And most of the successful teams currently have rebuilt over the years.
There's no excuse you can make for the payroll being gutted like this. None.
That is correct.
STL could easily rebuild AND keep payroll well above $100M.