Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 11:21 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 10:23 am
Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 09:08 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:38 am
I want this one:
#3 Prospect ... OF Lazaro Montes AA age 21 6-5 210 ETA 2026 ranked 29th in Top 100
Especially if C. Bloom feels his team down below can up his other tools to close to league average.
This team desperately needs a power hitting OF'er, this kid could be it.
The Seattle package is a dreadful idea.
A "could be it" outfielder who is lesser than options STL already has in the system and a pitcher who's only significant upside is a novelty act?
No thanks.
Ha!
NOT even close to being "lesser than options STL already has" which is NOTHING!
Stupid the swap for Montes when they already have Baez knocking on the door.
One is no better or worse a bet than the other - neither are sure things.
Bloom must get someone who has already has a successful MLB look.
Trading Donovan for one or two rolls of the dice would be idiocy that I would expect from Super Slo Mo - not from Bloom.
What's wrong with doubling your odds of finding that desperately needed powerhitting OFer?
And reading up on Montes, I'm definitely interested in a powerhitting OF'er w/30-40 HR power potential who's swing is being compared to
J. Alvarez and he's got a solid batting eye (re: takes walks).
If he develops into that 35-40 HR hitter w/a .350+ OB%, then he's a winner even if he KO's 150 times.
For one who labeled N. Gorman the "unicorn" when he projected to those exact stats, sans the batting eye needed to take walks and get t that .350 OB%, I'm surprised you're taking shots at this kid.
BTW, very few prospects are a "sure thing", most are just a c r a p shoot.
Remember this is B. Donovan we're trading, not a superstar player (RE: J. Soto when traded) who's brings back that "sure thing(s)".
